| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/07/2008 05:57:07 PM · #1 |
| The results for the Sepia challenge have been recalculated due to the disqualification of the 1st place image. The photographer mistakenly applied a vignette with the sepia effect, and self-reported it. Congrats to kine on the new ribbon. |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:02:03 PM · #2 |
Congrats to Magno for being upfront as well..
I for one would of tried to blag it :) |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:24:39 PM · #3 |
Congrats to the new winners.
Congrats to Magno. A man of honor is rare these days. I'm impressed.
|
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:32:18 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Simms:
Congrats to Magno for being upfront as well..
I for one would of tried to blag it :) |
Ha ha! Best re-check lord of the fall - defo summet iffy about that image! Lol :-) |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:39:11 PM · #5 |
Can I ask why we dont allow vignette's??? Just wondering?
|
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:42:42 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by gwe21:
Can I ask why we dont allow vignette's??? Just wondering? |
Its not that we don't allow vignettes. Its that we don't allow added elements. If it wasn't there when you snapped the shot then its not legal.
Someone correct me if I am wrong
edit: Here is the exact part of the basic ruleset
You may not use ANY editing tool to create new image area, objects or features (such as vignettes, lens flare or
motion) that didn’t already exist in your original capture.
That being said I am not sure if it would legal under advanced or not.
Message edited by author 2008-05-07 18:44:33. |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:47:42 PM · #7 |
Citadel you are right, but vignettes are allowed under advanced rules.
|
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:48:23 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Citadel:
Originally posted by gwe21:
Can I ask why we dont allow vignette's??? Just wondering? |
Its not that we don't allow vignettes. Its that we don't allow added elements. If it wasn't there when you snapped the shot then its not legal.
Someone correct me if I am wrong
edit: Here is the exact part of the basic ruleset
You may not use ANY editing tool to create new image area, objects or features (such as vignettes, lens flare or
motion) that didn’t already exist in your original capture.
That being said I am not sure if it would legal under advanced or not. |
I believe that adding a vignette in Advanced is legal! Although you can't add a lens flare!
|
|
|
|
05/07/2008 06:56:49 PM · #9 |
| One thing to be learned from this story: Watch out when you apply Lightroom "presets". They work by simply changing the settings for the image, so you can see what they do. Some apply vignette for effect, which isn't legal. |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 07:02:32 PM · #10 |
| As I posted on the entry, Paulo, this photo is worthy of a blue, but you're worthy of a gold for your honesty and humility :) |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 07:18:10 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by BeeCee:
As I posted on the entry, Paulo, this photo is worthy of a blue, but you're worthy of a gold for your honesty and humility :) |
Thanks sheila, but I'd like to think the majority of the good folk on dpc would have done the same!!! |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 07:21:01 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by Magno:
Originally posted by BeeCee:
As I posted on the entry, Paulo, this photo is worthy of a blue, but you're worthy of a gold for your honesty and humility :) |
Thanks sheila, but I'd like to think the majority of the good folk on dpc would have done the same!!! |
I'd like to, too... but I have my doubts :) |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 07:31:54 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Citadel:
That being said I am not sure if it would legal under advanced or not. |
Just to clarify, yes, definitely legal under Advanced. |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 07:51:10 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by Magno:
Originally posted by Simms:
Congrats to Magno for being upfront as well..
I for one would of tried to blag it :) |
Ha ha! Best re-check lord of the fall - defo summet iffy about that image! Lol :-) |
Sssshhhhhhhhhh! |
|
|
|
05/07/2008 11:19:50 PM · #15 |
your a better man than most my friend....well done!-both the image and your honesty...
|
|
|
|
05/12/2008 07:21:18 PM · #16 |
Wow... just noticed that there were 13 DQ's in this challenge.
Wonder if that's some kind of record (?). |
|
|
|
05/12/2008 10:12:18 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by roba:
Wow... just noticed that there were 13 DQ's in this challenge.
Wonder if that's some kind of record (?). |
I wondered the same thing:
//www.dpchallenge.com/forum.php?action=read&FORUM_THREAD_ID=775986
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 06:28:06 PM EDT.
