Author | Thread |
|
04/16/2008 05:46:35 PM · #1 |
Received an email from my husband just now, knowing I love finding quirky things on the web and am always willing to learn new design techniques, he says;
"Have you seen this one? Worth pinching the code?"
Wedding Photographers Toronto
[cough] |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:50:48 PM · #2 |
Oh my. How do they expect anyone to stay on that site for more than 3 seconds?
|
|
|
04/16/2008 05:52:12 PM · #3 |
Before you buy, don't forget to read the WARNING |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:52:12 PM · #4 |
One hopes that this is a joke but I fear not... |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:52:36 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by gloda: Oh my. How do they expect anyone to stay on that site for more than 3 seconds? |
I stayed 4.... then threw up (made me dizzy)... the wondered if they get clients through that site... or even at all... |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:54:03 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Eyesup: Originally posted by gloda: Oh my. How do they expect anyone to stay on that site for more than 3 seconds? |
I stayed 4.... then threw up (made me dizzy)... the wondered if they get clients through that site... or even at all... |
lmao!! |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:54:34 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by iamwoman: Before you buy, don't forget to read the WARNING |
You went as far as reading the warning? Brave girl.... |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:55:16 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by rinac: Originally posted by iamwoman: Before you buy, don't forget to read the WARNING |
You went as far as reading the warning? Brave girl.... |
I even went further - the LOVE WALKS are worthy of viewing... |
|
|
04/16/2008 05:55:18 PM · #9 |
I bet he was a finalist on photolaureats.com :) |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:00:39 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by iamwoman: I even went further - the LOVE WALKS are worthy of viewing... |
Heehee! Why does the sexy-girl-on-sparkly-lips change to a smiley I wonder? I can't even begin to fathom the reasoning behind any of it. |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:00:41 PM · #11 |
...I don't even know what to say...that may have been the most ridiculous wedding photography site I have ever seen. |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:00:56 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by iamwoman: Originally posted by rinac: Originally posted by iamwoman: Before you buy, don't forget to read the WARNING |
You went as far as reading the warning? Brave girl.... |
I even went further - the LOVE WALKS are worthy of viewing... |
OMG!!!
|
|
|
04/16/2008 06:12:03 PM · #13 |
My favorite quote - "YOU SEE NOW YOU ARE HOLLYWOOD STARS LIKE I PROMISED!!!!!!!!" |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:18:00 PM · #14 |
from the site.
Photography Mentors
I love digital cameras BUT not for wedding photography, even here on my website I am using many images from my cell phone camera Sony-Erikson - 3.4 MP, Kodak 221 - 5 MP
|
|
|
04/16/2008 06:26:33 PM · #15 |
My daughter and I just decided that the person responsible for this (Dr.David Kogan Ph.D.,MPPA, LPWPO, we believe?) is a doctor of psychology and has set this up to check what sort of individual would actually consider hiring them.
I need to believe that theory, because the idea that they are for real is entirely too scary to me. |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:30:51 PM · #16 |
I love the "existing couples" section, it makes me wonder how often non-existing couples hire wedding photographers. |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:31:46 PM · #17 |
Reminds me of my nearest competitor - she lives about 2 miles from me:
//home.together.net/~captivatingspecialtiesphotos/index.html
|
|
|
04/16/2008 06:34:32 PM · #18 |
Oh... my... goodness...
Well at least she won't cause a seizure! |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:37:39 PM · #19 |
Anyone been to the blog yet? I need an explanation for the first photo... |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:39:17 PM · #20 |
I was really impreesed with the shot of what looked like a wig on a post, every wedding should have one |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:45:20 PM · #21 |
"Or if your are still love shoot your wedding digitally - let me do it with World Best Digital Camera - Canon 1D-MK III"
Might as well say "All your digitals are belong to us!"
|
|
|
04/16/2008 06:49:03 PM · #22 |
Well, I learned something. Did you know that roll film is the equivalent of a 25,000 MP digital camera? He recommends roll film, even though he uses digital for non-wedding stuff. He likes to use his 3.4MP cell-phone camera and his Kodak 221 5MP camera...
Warning indeed! That's a warning right there for me alright...
|
|
|
04/16/2008 06:57:56 PM · #23 |
Holy Crap! I wouldn't even know where to begin. This one trumps the OP's IMO - while I squinted and struggled to read the home page of the one, this one actually made me nauseous. Do you call her "Lizforshort" ?
And I would bet any amount of money that she claims to get lots of compliments on her site. They always do. *shakes head and swallows bile* |
|
|
04/16/2008 06:59:15 PM · #24 |
Great. Now my eyes are bleeding.
Good God, that may not be the worst site on the web, but I guarantee you it is in the bottom 3. I think I have figured out the reason it looks the way it does, and it comes down to three simple letters: Ph.D |
|
|
04/16/2008 07:02:22 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao: "Or if your are still love shoot your wedding digitally - let me do it with World Best Digital Camera - Canon 1D-MK III"
Might as well say "All your digitals are belong to us!" |
LMAO! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 05:51:01 PM EDT.