DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 or nikkor 24-85 f/2.8-4 ?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 12 of 12, (reverse)
AuthorThread
01/10/2008 07:21:01 PM · #1
hi there. i'll buy a nikon d80 body in a few weeks. but i can't decide which lens is better for it. so i have a few questions.
which lens has a stronger body and better glass? 18-70 or 28-85?
18-70mm is a dx lens and made for d-slr. 28-85 also do good job on d80 body?
i need your advises. thanks :)
01/10/2008 07:25:20 PM · #2
the second lens is not 28-85. it's 24-85.. sorry =)
01/10/2008 07:43:49 PM · #3
The 18-70 is a fine lens and in my opinion you would be happier with the wider lens because of the crop factor. I don't have the 24-85 but I do have the 18-70. The 28-85 would really be like a 42-125, so if you are shooting indoors or in a confined space it may not be wide enough.

I say 18-70

My 2 cents anyway.

Go Nikon! :-)

Message edited by author 2008-01-10 19:47:49.
01/10/2008 07:52:53 PM · #4
I'm rather pleased with my 18-70. Construction is on par with the D80 - well put together but not pro.
01/10/2008 07:54:01 PM · #5
Originally posted by option:

I'm rather pleased with my 18-70. Construction is on par with the D80 - well put together but not pro.


Jeese a guy gets a D200 and he thinks he is a pro...

;-P
01/10/2008 10:32:02 PM · #6
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:

Originally posted by option:

I'm rather pleased with my 18-70. Construction is on par with the D80 - well put together but not pro.


Jeese a guy gets a D200 and he thinks he is a pro...

;-P


you know what I mean....
01/10/2008 10:40:50 PM · #7
Originally posted by option:

Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:

Originally posted by option:

I'm rather pleased with my 18-70. Construction is on par with the D80 - well put together but not pro.


Jeese a guy gets a D200 and he thinks he is a pro...

;-P


you know what I mean....


I know I am just messin' with ya. :-)
01/10/2008 10:43:40 PM · #8
I love my 24-85. Here is what is good and bad about it...

Good:
It is SHARP!
It has FAST focus eventhough it is not AF-S.
It can do half life size macro.
It can also do macro at 35mm setting which gives you very intersting perspective
It is SHARP!

Bad:
It has barrel distortions on wide end which I don't like.
Not as wide as 18-70. However on D300 it doesn't bother me as much as on D70. Weird.
Manual focus is hard for normal shooting. (who uses it anyway?) Macro focus is fine.
You get a some CA in macro at 85MM.
A bit heavy
01/10/2008 11:40:06 PM · #9
Why don't you wait a few weeks (up to a month) and see if the Nikon 16-85 DX VR AF-S 3.5-5.6 is any good. Supposedly it will be replacing the 18-70.
It is pretty much confirmed now. You should hear about it during PMA at the end of the month.
01/11/2008 05:39:53 AM · #10
16-85 is an interesting choice. i'll consider it when it comes. i'm curious how much will it be?
01/11/2008 03:03:39 PM · #11
Originally posted by otraju:

16-85 is an interesting choice. i'll consider it when it comes. i'm curious how much will it be?


Yes but no macro and not f2.8. You should realy target lens to what you will be shooting.
01/12/2008 05:48:14 AM · #12
yes it's not f/2.8 but nikon's f/2.8 zoom lenses is very expensive for me. =( I think I'll be okay with this lens. I'll wait and see.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 08:59:36 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 08:59:36 PM EDT.