Slingshot 100 vs 200 camera bag - DPChallenge Forums

01/07/2007 12:48:48 AM · #2

I'm on my 3rd bag upgrade because I can't seem to buy one big enough to accomodate all of the things I've bought in the last year ... my only advice would be to head to a camera store and check them out ... the last one I got, I took all of my gear with me and the store let me play around with all of the bags to make sure I got one that worked for me ...

Valdo

Canon EOS-40D

01/07/2007 12:52:55 AM · #3

Hi John, I am not very sure about the size of the pentax. I own a Slingshot 100 and so far it is enough for me.

This is what I carry around all the time:
Canon 400D
18-55mm lens (usually mounted)
Tamron 70-300 with lenscap (My camera also fits in the bag with this lens on)
a retractable lenscap for the 18-55mm
50mm 1.8 II
Battery charger
Extra battery (I have enough space for more batteries)
Card reader
Canon 400D Manual
USB cable
Palm pilot (that I use as remote control)

I think it will be difficult for me to acommodate a flashgun when I finnaly buy one.

I hope this helps

*too lazy at this time of the day to stand up, take some shots, download the pics and upload ;) But I will do it for you if your really need them.

Message edited by author 2007-01-07 00:54:04.

Valdo

Canon EOS-40D

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

01/07/2007 12:56:59 AM · #4

Originally posted by pamelasue:

That is a good piece of advice. At least make sure that your camera fits in easily with your favorite lens. The slingshot is great to get the camera quickly without opening all the zipper. The slingshot 200 is quite big, I don't want to carry that much. But eventually you will overgrow any kind of bag you can think off LOL

Neil

Fujifilm X-T30

01/07/2007 12:57:49 AM · #5

As much as I like the idea of the slingshots (I had a great sling bag before, but the strap seam started to tear), I wonder what happens when you forget to zip it and then push it back to your back. It seems to me it's designed so that your camera and lenses will be at risk of falling out.

The sling bag I had had a top zipper. The whole bag could be rotated to my front, and the opening was always at the top, never the side.

I now use the Lowepro photorunner (because I travel light). I do like having the bag always available at my side, but then I try to keep it down to a camera and three lenses (and Cokin filters, which can take a lot of room). It's a small solution thus eliminating the need for a backpack. Sometimes I carry two small shoulder bags to give me balance and accessibility. Sometimes I carry and ordinary lightweight backpack with the one (or even two bags) for things like coat, tripod (and the camera, if I don't need it out; the photorunner is sometimes just for the lenses and accessories.)

Valdo

Canon EOS-40D

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM for Nikon

01/07/2007 01:03:37 AM · #6

Originally posted by nshapiro:

... I wonder what happens when you forget to zip it and then push it back to your back. ...

:S never ever forget to zip it :) or you will learn how much your camera and gear bounces from the floor. (yay I will have a nightmare about this)

khdoss

Nikon D300

01/07/2007 01:57:01 AM · #7

Think Tank Photo
These guys have really thought about the photographer I think they have found a great solution for us wimmans and our boobs. Damn bags are always cutting into the tatas..

Vince bought this belt and loves it. I have a sling and I still have problems with
hurting my back at times, but I carry all my stuff with me. Also the sling does not offer a great way to carry my tripod.

Message edited by author 2007-01-07 01:57:44.

BlueAngel

Nikon D90

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

01/16/2007 07:48:36 PM · #8

I compared the two fairly closely when I bought my 200. The reason for buying the 200 was I wanted to be sure I'd have a bag big enough for all of my lenses, flashes and filters as well as all of my gear including chargers, cables, manuals, etc... basically everything but a tripod and monopod in one bag when necessary.

My plan is to have a bag that fits it all when I need it all, and also have a much smaller "walk-around" camera bag that just fits the camera with walk-around zoom lens and battery charger. This way when I'm camping, skiing, etc., I don't have a big backpack full of stuff to haul around, but I still have adequate camera protection.

To be honest, I see the walk-around setup getting far more use, but it's still handy to be able to put everything in one bag.

BMacD

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko Digital Zoom

01/16/2007 08:13:38 PM · #9

I have the 100 and I really like it!

I have camera body, both kit lenses, several filters, battery charger, flash, mini tripod, usb cable, extra batteries, camera manual,(Packed with the rain cover) note pad, pen, cell phone and wallet. With room to spare.

I also believe in the �gas law.� Given the space we will fill it! No matter how big the bag, you will fill it! Do you really need to carry all that �weight� just in case?

I fly and travel a lot. The 100 is a great travel companion. It has never been questioned as an additional carry on.

Just my 2 c�s

John Pahl

Nikon Coolpix AW 100

Pentax DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF

01/16/2007 08:47:40 PM · #10

I went with the 100 and really like the size so far.
I see they make a slingshot 300 now. Just seen it in the feb popphoto.

Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) for Canon

03/26/2007 10:51:23 AM · #11

Bringing this thread back to life for a quick question:

I like the design of the LowePro Slingshot 200, and want something to put my camera in while my Canon 100-400mm lens is attached, but the specs only say, "holds an SLR with mid-range zoom lens attached..."

Is my 100-400 a mid-range?
Anybody know if it will fit while attached?

If so, I'll be trudging over to Henry's again. To pick it up. I suppose I could call Henry's & ask.

MarioAngel

Canon EOS-400D Rebel XTi

03/26/2007 11:01:34 AM · #12

"Is my 100-400 a mid-range?
Anybody know if it will fit while attached?"

The Lowepro website has the actual dimensions of the bag.

I don't think the 100-400 would count as mid-range.

Bugzeye

Fisher Price Kid-Tough Digital

03/26/2007 11:06:28 AM · #13

It seems like choosing a new gear bag is more difficult than choosing a new camera or lens. I have been looking for a new bag for 6 months. Finding it hard to shell out the 200+ dollars I will need to spend to get a decent quality bag that is big enough to hold everything I intend to carry around. Which would include everthing in my profile + speedlights, extra batteries, cards, teleconvertor etc... It is a heavy load so I want a bag that has comfortable straps.

To the OP I would say look at a bag that you think would work perfect now and then buy the next size up. You will grow into it and then out of it.

Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8D IF-ED

03/26/2007 11:11:58 AM · #14

Originally posted by MarioAngel:

"Is my 100-400 a mid-range?
Anybody know if it will fit while attached?"

The Lowepro website has the actual dimensions of the bag.

I don't think the 100-400 would count as mid-range.

Thanks, the inner dimensions are:
Size (Interior): 8.7W x 5.9D x 11.8H in. / 22 x 15 x 30 cm

I figure I'll need about 25cm of length. I supose that I can reconfigure the pack to fit the camera & lens at 90 degrees to what's shown in the photo on their website.
????

get04rit

Nikon D300

03/26/2007 11:13:53 AM · #15

I almost bought the Slingshot 200 but wasn't happy with the strap being on the left shoulder. I recently bought the Crumpler 6 million dollar bagand I love it. It is ver comfortable and you can just slide it around to your front for easy access to your camera. But if you are stuck on a slingshot make sure you check out the new 300. It is a little bigger then the 200.

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

03/26/2007 11:19:26 AM · #16

Originally posted by get04rit:

But if you are stuck on a slingshot make sure you check out the new 300. It is a little bigger then the 200.

Ya, It's advertised at Henry's, but is a new item and they don't know when it will be in stock. I'm an impulsive buyer, and don't have the patience to wait. :-) Wish they had it, though.

Message edited by author 2007-03-26 11:20:17.

swankFoto

Fujifilm X-E1

03/26/2007 12:28:53 PM · #17

I got the micro trekker 200 instead of the slingshot 200 because I liked the "day packish" compartment better, it had tripod straps and lower cost.
I have no problems swinging it around on one shoulder to get access to my gear. I think the complaints of traditional backpacks are overstated in that regard.

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

03/26/2007 12:38:42 PM · #18

Originally posted by rswank:

Ah, I hadn't considered this. If I were able to reconfigure the inside, I could sort of rotate all of the contents 90 degrees. Then I could take an arm out of one of the straps and sling it around, Slingshot-style, though it might by tippy.

I've also found the Lowepro Omni Trekker, which sounds flexible between backpack and sidepack-modes. (without the hard case included) It's in stock at Henry's.

Anybody ever use the Lowepro Omni Trekker?

buzzy

Canon EOS-400D Rebel XTi

03/26/2007 01:52:43 PM · #19

I tried both the 100 and 200 and found they were both very small inside given the outside size of bag. I wanted to carry one camera, one lens (canon 17-85, so not a biggie), and a waterproof jacket. I could fit all this in the LowePro Micro Trekker, which looks much smaller, but not into the Slingshot 200.

In the end, I got a satchel-style bag from Crumpler (the fabulously named "Loyal Chap" model) and I love it.

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

03/26/2007 02:36:06 PM · #20

Originally posted by get04rit:

I just got back from Henry's. I didn't like the Lowepro Omni Trekker. I put a reservation in for a Slingshot 300 when they get in. No Crumpler's at Henry's, but since I could be waiting on the Slingshot 300, I'll look into that as well.

Pfft. I hate waiting.

leaf

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

03/26/2007 02:53:12 PM · #21

i just bought the slingshot 200 and had it on a outing the other day. I was quite happy with it and liked the fact that i could swing it around to get at my gear. I have tried swinging my backpack around before and it just didn't work. You might be able to swish something small out, but getting a camera or large lens out, requires putting it on the ground.

I was happy with the 200 size choice. I don't think i would want a 300 full of gear on my shoulder all day long. the 200 was about as much as i wanted to carry on one shoulder. Even that got a little tiring after a while. I managed to squish in a canon 5d with a 24-70 2.8 on it (lens hood reversed), a 70-200 2.8 beside that, and then a 16-35 squished in the corner. I also put the 550 ex and extra batteries in the top compartment area.

03/26/2007 03:05:28 PM · #22

Well, I just got off the phone with a camera shop in Burlington. They have a 300 and are holding it for me, so I'll pick it up after work today. :-)

I need the 300 because I want to have to option of having my 100-400 mounted and in the bag.

I won't always be carting all my stuff around in it, but I like the option to. I practically grew up carrying 50 pounds of rocks through thick bush half the day, as an exploration geologist. Weight is no problem for me. I usually also have a kid on my shoulders for walks & gentler hikes. :-)

Yay!

byetko

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM

07/25/2007 07:02:23 PM · #23

Im about to buy an 400D and my question is:

Will the 100 hold the camera with the battery grip attached?

I keep searching everywhere and cannot find the answer.

Thanks in advance.

Damn its been awhile since ive been here.

DelRioPhoto

Nikon D700

Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8D IF-ED

07/25/2007 07:09:02 PM · #24

I have the Slingshot 300 and am very happy with it. I hold 2 or 3 lenses and three strobes plus some filters and spare batteries when I am out and about. It also has room for a 32 oz Nalgene bottle as well. If you're going to be carrying the bag a long time, the left to right shoulder strap eventually gets to be a little tiresome on your shoulder. For what I do with it, it's great.

Cheers!

byetko