| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/29/2005 02:20:45 PM · #1 |
The previous 2nd place entry in the Bubbles challenge has been disqualified due to a violation of the Basic Editing rules.
Congratulations to Jean for her 2nd place ribbon and to Ursula for her 3rd place ribbon. |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 02:31:51 PM · #2 |
Holy moly what software are you people using to detect stuff like that. You guys are good.
It was still an awsome photo!
edit: spelingg
Message edited by author 2005-09-29 14:32:20.
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:02:46 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:06:09 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Be Honest v3.81. ;-) |
when did they put out an upgrade? I'm still on Be Honest 3.80...
what are the new features? :)
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:15:05 PM · #5 |
| In the comments he had mentioned using gaussian blur with soft-light and screen... those advanced edits I believe |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:17:57 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by dsa157:
Originally posted by scalvert:
Be Honest v3.81. ;-) |
when did they put out an upgrade? I'm still on Be Honest 3.80...
what are the new features? :) |
Well, they fixed the bug that made v3.80 really 'Lie When You Need To' ;)
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:18:59 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by dsa157:
Originally posted by scalvert:
Be Honest v3.81. ;-) |
when did they put out an upgrade? I'm still on Be Honest 3.80...
what are the new features? :) |
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:28:30 PM · #8 |
OK, I made it to the top 10 thanks to this DQ, but I'de rather stayed in the relative obscurity of the second page - I really liked the (former) 2nd place photo...
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:36:03 PM · #9 |
| it wasn't a matter of us not liking the image. it was a matter of it not being legal for this challenge. |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 03:49:31 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by muckpond:
it wasn't a matter of us not liking the image. it was a matter of it not being legal for this challenge. |
I know, I know... I am not upset at SC, just sad...
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:09:46 PM · #11 |
I am curious, just what was considered DQ'able?
"Gaussian blur a bit, sharpened, leveled, desaturated a bit and added a border."
None of those seem to be DQ'ble - are they???
Is gaussian blur illegal? |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:15:11 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by theSaj:
I am curious, just what was considered DQ'able?
"Gaussian blur a bit, sharpened, leveled, desaturated a bit and added a border."
None of those seem to be DQ'ble - are they???
Is gaussian blur illegal? |
I believe he has now edited his details section. The original details talked about Duplicate layer, gaussian blur, soft light, and screen modes. Having layers in any other mode than 'normal' is not allowed in basic editing.
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:17:44 PM · #13 |
| I hate to say this, but the 4th place mentions a "salt and pepper filter". I'm not sure what that is... |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:24:23 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
I hate to say this, but the 4th place mentions a "salt and pepper filter". I'm not sure what that is... |
it's used to remove small specks, much like a median cut filter or a noise reducing filter (like noise ninja or neat image). so long as it's applied to the entire image, it's considered legal even in basic editing...
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:28:47 PM · #15 |
| phew, ok, I had a feeling, but hadn't heard the term before. |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:46:08 PM · #16 |
Paint Shop Pro
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
phew, ok, I had a feeling, but hadn't heard the term before. |
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:52:16 PM · #17 |
how can i find the DQ'd image .. i forgot what it was! ... I love DQ!
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 04:54:40 PM · #18 |
the salt-n-pepa ("let's talk about sex, bay-bee!") filter is legal in basic, as long as it's applied to the entire image.
metatate: the dq'd shots can be found at the end of the challenge results pages. look on the very last page for this one. |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 05:01:12 PM · #19 |
Why is in the rant forum?
|
|
|
|
09/29/2005 05:15:10 PM · #20 |
| i dunno why it ended up in rant. i think someone is toying with my head. :) |
|
|
|
09/29/2005 06:26:34 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by muckpond:
i dunno why it ended up in rant. i think someone is toying with my head. :) |
Or maybe you just got too much Sun today!!!! :-)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 02:08:32 PM EDT.
