Author | Thread |
|
08/26/2002 12:31:51 AM · #1 |
...and a bunch of 2s! I really have no reason to complain. I didn't really WANT to win, I definitely didn't EXPECT to win, but I did think I had a nice shot that was on-topic. Why did I end up with 10 2s?
Oh well. My great scores outweighed my crappy scores so I'm happy. Best score ever and I just hope it's not a fluke.
I would just like to have some justification of the scores that are given sometimes. I know it will never happen. I guess this is why this is a RANT.
OK, I'm going to bed.
Rob |
|
|
08/26/2002 12:52:07 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by muckpond: ...and a bunch of 2s! I really have no reason to complain. I didn't really WANT to win, I definitely didn't EXPECT to win, but I did think I had a nice shot that was on-topic. Why did I end up with 10 2s?
Oh well. My great scores outweighed my crappy scores so I'm happy. Best score ever and I just hope it's not a fluke.
I would just like to have some justification of the scores that are given sometimes. I know it will never happen. I guess this is why this is a RANT.
OK, I'm going to bed.
Rob
Don't sweat it; there's no accounting for how peeps will vote. Your photo is awesome. |
|
|
08/26/2002 12:58:31 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by lhall: Originally posted by muckpond: [i]...I would just like to have some justification of the scores that are given sometimes. ... Rob
Don't sweat it; there's no accounting for how peeps will vote...[/i]
i got a comment that i was voted down cuz someone else thought of my idea (ie, unoriginal) perhaps they hit you, too
|
|
|
08/26/2002 01:15:12 AM · #4 |
and in the current voting - to whoever voted on my pic already, thanks - it looks good to see my pic up there with a score of "8" (if only for another 10 minutes) :P
|
|
|
08/26/2002 02:02:43 AM · #5 |
Take a look at the scores of the winner this week. See any one`s or two`s??? On a scale of "here to there"... Just flow... Did you have fun doing it? That`s it!!! |
|
|
08/26/2002 10:57:34 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by spiderman: Originally posted by lhall: [i]Originally posted by muckpond: [i]...I would just like to have some justification of the scores that are given sometimes. ... Rob
Don't sweat it; there's no accounting for how peeps will vote...[/i]
i got a comment that i was voted down cuz someone else thought of my idea (ie, unoriginal) perhaps they hit you, too [/i]
I guess I made that comment. But I gave you a 9. You got worse from others, right?
|
|
|
08/27/2002 12:36:52 AM · #7 |
You placed 14th! Quit whinning. |
|
|
08/27/2002 12:49:39 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Zeissman: You placed 14th! Quit whinning.
I'm not whining - I'm giving MUCKPOND an example of what some people use to justify giving out lower scores --- however, I will take this opportunity to voice my disappointment with whoever's responsible for denying me a share of that $120 million lottery !!!
* This message has been edited by the author on 8/27/2002 12:48:55 AM.
|
|
|
08/29/2002 06:58:57 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by spiderman: Originally posted by Zeissman: [i]You placed 14th! Quit whinning.
I'm not whining - I'm giving MUCKPOND an example ...[/i]
ooops - i didn't come in 14th - that wasn't addressed to me!
but i'm still not whining
|
|
|
08/29/2002 07:32:35 PM · #10 |
I don't think it is whining to complain about obviously ridiculous scores. Clearly, if you don't care for the subject then score it lower than otherwise; but this is a well-shot pic, in focus, on subject and with (regardless of whether one likes it not) some degree of creativity. Therefore, a 1 or 2 is simply dumb and reflects a lot worse on the giver than the receiver. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/28/2024 01:20:45 PM EDT.