| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/07/2003 08:36:50 PM · #1 |
Anyone recommend a good tripod for an SLR camera ?
|
|
|
|
01/07/2003 09:20:22 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
01/07/2003 09:24:12 PM · #3 |
Gordon, in my experience it all depends on the total combined weight of the camera, lens and the flash.
Personally, I prefer Slik tripods due to their tradition of a single control for unlocking both pan and tilt. But, I also use several models from Manfrotto for larger lenses on the heavier cameras. I would look carefully at the leg-locking mechanisms, as they tend to be the principal weakness of design. I prefer the twist-lock type locks compared to the pressure-flap style. I would always go just a bit bigger than you think you need. There is no worse feeling then to see your camera tip over.
On longer lenses, stability and the ability to lock off "exactly" on the desired alignment is critical. Lesser tripods can shift slightly after tightening the locks. Another nice feature is the secondary supports that force the legs to move together rather than independently. However, all these features mean extra weight to carry. My solution equals four tripods of varying designs and a wonderful monopod with a pistol grip. Good hunting. Michael |
|
|
|
01/08/2003 12:06:48 AM · #4 |
I agree. Bogen is the way to go. If you have the money get a Video heavy duty Bogen. The extra stability is worth it.
Turbotech
Message edited by author 2003-01-09 01:40:26. |
|
|
|
01/08/2003 12:40:24 AM · #5 |
If you want an extremely versatile and sturdy tripod you should look at the Bogen 3021 models (Manfrotto range). Couple that with a nice 3-way head like the 3047 and you're good to go. I've used this setup and like it very much, although it would look much better with your D60 than my G2 :)
Message edited by author 2003-01-08 00:55:53.
|
|
|
|
01/08/2003 02:28:12 AM · #6 |
| When I was shopping for my first tripod back in 1970, my teacher said, "Buy the most expensive tripod you can afford, and the biggest one your (spouse) can carry." It may not be entirely P.C., nor appropriate 100% of the time, but it is REAL close to the truth. (I also lean towards the Manfrotto/Bogen choices. Probably with a good ball head, as opposed to the Bogen 3030 head on my pod at this moment.) |
|
|
|
01/08/2003 07:10:05 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by greenem2:
If you want an extremely versatile and sturdy tripod you should look at the Bogen 3021 models (Manfrotto range). Couple that with a nice 3-way head like the 3047 and you're good to go. I've used this setup and like it very much, although it would look much better with your D60 than my G2 :) |
Those were my thoughts exactly. I just bought a Bogen 3021 Pro and it's an awesome tripod!
The one thing I don't agree with in Morgan's post is the independent leg movement. I think it's more of an advantage than a disadvantage but it's very possible that a center brace might be of benefit in some situations (I actually found it a hinderance when trying to set up my tripod for some photos).
|
|
|
|
01/08/2003 07:32:01 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by psychephylax:
Originally posted by greenem2:
If you want an extremely versatile and sturdy tripod you should look at the Bogen 3021 models (Manfrotto range). Couple that with a nice 3-way head like the 3047 and you're good to go. I've used this setup and like it very much, although it would look much better with your D60 than my G2 :) |
Those were my thoughts exactly. I just bought a Bogen 3021 Pro and it's an awesome tripod!
The one thing I don't agree with in Morgan's post is the independent leg movement. I think it's more of an advantage than a disadvantage but it's very possible that a center brace might be of benefit in some situations (I actually found it a hinderance when trying to set up my tripod for some photos). |
You make a good point.
But, the Manfrotto that I own has the ability to independently adjust the supporting arms for each leg, so it is really the best of both worlds. It offers a knob adjustment to permit the supports to extend beyond or less than the other supports. This is useful for irregular terrain set-ups. As well, I use a D-SLR (Nikon D1x) and some very large lenses, like an AF-S 80-200mm, VR 80-400mm, 300mm, 500mm and 1,000mm catadioptric (mirror) lenses and the extra support and stabilization under this sort of excessive load condition is a requirement.
Also, I have a larger ½” mounting plate and make use of my Hasselblad medium format cameras on the same tripod. So, it does double duty for me. I would offer the Manfrotto model numbers, but I understand that they are different between Canada and the United States. |
|
|
|
01/13/2003 03:51:39 AM · #9 |
Be very careful when opening the flap locks on the legs of a Manfrotto 3001 tripod. On several occasions I have recklessly snapped one open and severly pinched the meaty part of my palm enough to make it bruise or bleed. Of course, at least you know the legs aren't going to collapse.
I have the 3001 with the 3030 head. My next tripod will probably be something more lightweight and easy to carry and with a different style head.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/20/2024 12:19:53 AM EDT.
