DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> genital nudity?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 127, (reverse)
AuthorThread
12/23/2002 12:57:28 AM · #1
i did not think this was allowed on this site, and submissions with genital nudity that are distasteful disappoint me considering how much i respect what this site tries to do. is this sort of thing allowed in a challenge? is there an age requirement for this site? what if there was an aspiring young photographer looking through entries on this site...it is unnecessary to have stuff like that here

Message edited by author 2002-12-23 01:34:07.
12/23/2002 01:00:15 AM · #2
Offensive nudity is dealt with by people requesting a DQ on the photo, and if the site council think it's too offensive they take it out. So if a photo offends you, request a DQ.

Personally, I thought it was hilarious :).
12/23/2002 01:02:04 AM · #3
i think it just makes a mockery out of this site
12/23/2002 01:08:04 AM · #4
The challenge IS body parts. Like LisaE said, if you think it violates the TOS, request DQ and let the council handle it. Please also try to refrain from discussing photos before voting is over. Thanks.
~Heather~
12/23/2002 01:18:44 AM · #5
this is a forum, it's made for talking about things...moreover, this is a current challenge thread, and the subject is on topic. nothing i say will affect the votes that people get, especially when it is something so obvious
12/23/2002 01:21:48 AM · #6
I don't know if the photo in question has been dq'd or not. But it is still showing on my voting page...just wanted to point that out in case it's a bug or something :)
12/23/2002 01:21:57 AM · #7
Just wanted to throw in that I agree that there is nothing wrong with discussing this issue here...

Drew
12/23/2002 01:26:06 AM · #8
I agree that the ISSUE is fine. I was just creating a friendly reminder to not stray to talk about specific photos, and it looks like it has already strayed.
OH well, I tried.

Message edited by author 2002-12-23 01:26:24.
12/23/2002 01:28:40 AM · #9
the way i see it is, would you let your son or daughter look through the photos in this site. i'm sure for most people, their kids play a big role in their photography, and some may actually view contest photos with their parents. if a photo is distasteful nudity, does it really belong here? i can understand artistic nudity, which could i guess be used as a tool to show the beauty of male and female, but not nudity just for the sake of it

and hbunch i don't need you to tell me how to talk on a forum...i've been around this site for several months now, and understand how it works...let the moderators do their job

Message edited by author 2002-12-23 01:33:19.
12/23/2002 01:33:21 AM · #10
Originally posted by achiral:

the way i see it is, would you let your son or daughter look through the photos in this site. i'm sure for most people, their kids play a big role in their photography, and some may actually view contest photos with their parents. if a photo is distasteful nudity, does it really belong here? i can understand artistic nudity, which could i guess be used as a tool to show the beauty of male and female, but not nudity just for the sake of it


There is an option in your preferences to allow you to hide nudity... i would suggest checking this out... :)

12/23/2002 01:36:54 AM · #11
Originally posted by jmsetzler:

Originally posted by achiral:

the way i see it is, would you let your son or daughter look through the photos in this site. i'm sure for most people, their kids play a big role in their photography, and some may actually view contest photos with their parents. if a photo is distasteful nudity, does it really belong here? i can understand artistic nudity, which could i guess be used as a tool to show the beauty of male and female, but not nudity just for the sake of it


There is an option in your preferences to allow you to hide nudity... i would suggest checking this out... :)


i can't believe i'm hearing that from a respected photographer here. i have no problem with artful nudity, and you all know exactly what that is and what i'm talking about...i'm sorry you guys want to trivialize the photography experience by accepting that kind of distasteful photography
12/23/2002 01:39:57 AM · #12
actually, heather is a moderator! :)
12/23/2002 01:41:06 AM · #13
i apologize to heather then, but my argument is the same
12/23/2002 01:41:40 AM · #14
I'm not supporting that type of photography... don't get me wrong here...

12/23/2002 01:44:03 AM · #15
Well, to get technical, it's stated in the TOS that was signed to enter the site that this site isn't suitable for people under 13 years old. It also states
"You understand that by using the Website, you may be exposed to content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable. Under no circumstances will DPChallenge.com be liable in any way for any content, including, but not limited to, for any errors or omissions in any content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any content posted, emailed, transmitted or otherwise made available via the Website."

It's fair warning, and everyone reading this agreed with the above statement. Also, there is now a nudity filter, for those who wish to ignore the warning, and let their 13 and under kids check out the photos. I think that 13 and up can handle a photo that is "questionable". I was in High school when I was 13. I think I saw worse things in the text books.

Of course, there will always be a fine line between what people feel is acceptable or not, and in the end, it's left up to 'big guys'.
I'm not trying to argue or start anything. Rather "discussing the issue" which has, in all honesty been discussed to death.

12/23/2002 01:44:28 AM · #16
john, you have that photo called forbidden fruit if i can remember correctly, and i think that is a great example of artful nudity, and i have nothing against that type of thing, just for the record. i don't want to sound like a censor nazi or something, i'm just voicing a concern
12/23/2002 01:47:59 AM · #17
Originally posted by jmsetzler:

Originally posted by achiral:

the way i see it is, would you let your son or daughter look through the photos in this site. i'm sure for most people, their kids play a big role in their photography, and some may actually view contest photos with their parents. if a photo is distasteful nudity, does it really belong here? i can understand artistic nudity, which could i guess be used as a tool to show the beauty of male and female, but not nudity just for the sake of it


There is an option in your preferences to allow you to hide nudity... i would suggest checking this out... :)


Ummm, it only hides nudity after voting. having it checked does not prevent it from being voted on.
12/23/2002 01:49:19 AM · #18
it's too bad all you can do is list site policies instead of actually having an opinion. i guess i just have to lighten up a little. i need some sleep, gotta catch that 7am train to work...:(
12/23/2002 01:49:28 AM · #19
Originally posted by achiral:

john, you have that photo called forbidden fruit if i can remember correctly, and i think that is a great example of artful nudity, and i have nothing against that type of thing, just for the record. i don't want to sound like a censor nazi or something, i'm just voicing a concern


I'm not complaining. I am just trying to keep an open mind. I will see things that are offensive wherever i go. DPC is no exception. :)
12/23/2002 02:00:41 AM · #20
Restating my "opinion" for anyone who may have missed it.

"I think that 13 and up can handle a photo that is "questionable". I was in High school when I was 13. I think I saw worse things in the text books.
"

Message edited by author 2002-12-23 02:00:56.
12/23/2002 02:06:57 AM · #21
I did not think the challenge was " small Body Parts "

Happy Christmas
Redfig
12/23/2002 02:09:17 AM · #22
I agree that a 13 year old can handle 'questionable' material... however I feel that the photo which started this discussion isn't questionable at all. It's my opinon that it's a cheap shot at showing one's wanger.

10-1 I know who's photo it is too.

Message edited by author 2002-12-23 02:24:32.
12/23/2002 02:19:11 AM · #23
Actually, I don't think we are discussing a specific photo... We are discussing an issue :)

My 2 cents...

If I find a photo objectionable (and I don't find any overly worrisome) or in bad taste (and I have an 'issue' with at least 1 this week), I simply say, "This is a bad photo in my opinion and earns a 1 from me"... Then I move on... Getting bent out of shape over it just accomplishes the photographers likely goal...
12/23/2002 02:20:45 AM · #24
I don't believe in any form of censorship. That doesn't stop me from saying that I think the image in question is in very poor taste, and I am surprised to find it here.

It will certainly colour my value of this person's opinion on anything in the future.
12/23/2002 07:33:08 AM · #25
The adult body parts are fine by me but I would suggest before you put child body parts on the site you might want to CYA.

There is a shot of what appear to be under age kids that might get some folks here in some serious trouble. I am one of the more hardcore folks here and don't care what I see if its good. But from a legal standpoint I would advise the site owners and moderators to look into this issue asap. :-)
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 07:20:25 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 07:20:25 PM EDT.