| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/09/2010 10:34:28 AM · #1 |
Found a picture taken by  gyaban at TheChive. Its photo number 16 of his Knight Rider Blue Ribbon Winner.
//thechive.com/2010/08/09/a-few-photos-that-turned-my-frown-upside-down-33-photos/
|
|
|
|
08/09/2010 10:40:44 AM · #2 |
| Thanks for pointing that out, didn't know about it. Hurray, I'm becoming famous! ;-) |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 10:53:08 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by gyaban:
Thanks for pointing that out, didn't know about it. Hurray, I'm becoming famous! ;-) |
You have another 14 minutes of fame coming to you. Spend it wisely. |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 12:12:29 PM · #4 |
| They've got some balls, putting their watermark on your image. I'd be seriously pissed. |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 12:27:15 PM · #5 |
I don't care much about their watermark tbh. Photography is just a hobby for me, so I'm happy if some of my pictures obtain attention :) I agree it is not an extremely polite behaviour, but well, better some consideration than none.
Would be a different story if this was my source of income, I suppose. |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 12:35:29 PM · #6 |
| It's just a "posted at" watermark, not a "photo by" one. They should do what DarkRoastedBlend does and at least make an attempt to give credit to the photographer underneath the image (with a link). |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 12:40:32 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by George:
It's just a "posted at" watermark, not a "photo by" one. They should do what DarkRoastedBlend does and at least make an attempt to give credit to the photographer underneath the image (with a link). |
Absolutely agreed.. |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 02:09:16 PM · #8 |
Yeah I would be mad as hell...Nice pic though
|
|
|
|
08/09/2010 03:17:57 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by George:
It's just a "posted at" watermark, not a "photo by" one. They should do what DarkRoastedBlend does and at least make an attempt to give credit to the photographer underneath the image (with a link). |
Frankly, they should do nothing. Other people's property is no place for their watermark, and their website is no place for other people's property. |
|
|
|
08/09/2010 03:25:53 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Louis:
Originally posted by George:
It's just a "posted at" watermark, not a "photo by" one. They should do what DarkRoastedBlend does and at least make an attempt to give credit to the photographer underneath the image (with a link). |
Frankly, they should do nothing. Other people's property is no place for their watermark, and their website is no place for other people's property. |
You are correct, both legally and morally, however, I interpreted George's post to mean that should they disregard both of your points, the very least they could do is attempt to attribute it correctly.
If it were my picture, I would be pleased it was enjoyed, but displeased that they had stolen my work. |
|
|
|
08/14/2010 09:33:13 PM · #11 |
I think it would be cool to find out that my picture was posted elsewhere, especially a site that get's loads of traffic. I would just respectfully ask them to use a picture with a watermark instead and would include one in the email I write to them to use.
|
|
|
|
08/14/2010 10:15:31 PM · #12 |
isnt that like illeagal?
They obviously got it off this site, which in the first place is bad, and they don't even give him credit. |
|
|
|
08/14/2010 11:34:52 PM · #13 |
| It isn't an issue if the owner doesn't mind. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/16/2024 01:57:38 AM EDT.
