Hidden due to content - DPChallenge Forums

04/21/2010 11:38:12 PM · #1

Does anybody else think we are taking this "hidden due to content" a little too far. Out of the three ribbon winners in the lingerie challenge I really can't see anything in the three images that would warrant a "hidden due to content".

Now if they were nudes I could possibly understand it, not necessarily agree with it but at least understand it, but these three images are nothing you wouldn't see in a flyer from Target or in your local paper.

Instead of photographers I imagine many people coming across this website would think we are a bunch or prudes!

04/21/2010 11:39:26 PM · #2

Originally posted by dzone1:

The "hidden due to content" thing is the choice of the photographer, by choosing to place that photo in a particular gallery, for the most part.

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

04/21/2010 11:49:34 PM · #3

Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

scalvert

Canon EOS-5D Mark III

04/21/2010 11:51:02 PM · #4

Originally posted by dzone1:

Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

We only flag actual nudity when the photographer doesn't.

04/21/2010 11:52:08 PM · #5

Originally posted by dzone1:

Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

Oh, and for the record, if you buy a membership, you get to choose whether or not to display that content.

04/21/2010 11:54:46 PM · #6

Are you on commission? LOL

Message edited by author 2010-04-21 23:55:05.

04/21/2010 11:58:53 PM · #7

Originally posted by dzone1:

Are you on commission? LOL

hehehe.

Sigma 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF for Pentax

04/22/2010 12:19:25 AM · #8

Originally posted by scalvert:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

We only flag actual nudity when the photographer doesn't.

Thanks Shannon, looks like I should have done a little research first!

Pug-H

Pentax K10D

04/22/2010 12:41:52 AM · #9

It's also good to have for when I'm using a computer at school, like now. (If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't keep nude photos hidden...)

04/22/2010 01:44:14 AM · #10

Originally posted by Pug-H:

It's also good to have for when I'm using a computer at school, like now. (If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't keep nude photos hidden...)

I do understand that, but surely the three ribbon winning images in the lingerie challenge wouldn't be a problem at school.

macobee

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM II

04/22/2010 02:10:47 AM · #11

Hi I havent read the thread, but the hidden due to content is completely rediculous here, there is no nudity, all models are dressed and in one you even only see a models legs

Moose408

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

04/22/2010 10:41:31 AM · #12

Originally posted by dzone1:

Instead of photographers I imagine many people coming across this website would think we are a bunch or prudes!

Based on some of the scores I got for my photo I have reached the conclusion that there are a fair number of prudes here at DPC.

keyz

Nikon D700

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G

04/22/2010 10:45:47 AM · #13

Originally posted by scalvert:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

We only flag actual nudity when the photographer doesn't.

But I don't really understand why mine needs this filter ... I didn't put this myself...

pixelpig

Sony Alpha a55

Sony DT 1.8/50mm SAM

04/22/2010 11:22:29 AM · #14

I have this website open on my computer at work, which I couldn't do otherwise. So, though I have no personal reason to hide any photo, nude or otherwise, I have to be very very careful at work. So I appreciate & trust the 'hidden' option.

Bear_Music

Samsung Galaxy S21, S21+, S21 Ultra

Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE OSS

04/22/2010 11:23:07 AM · #15

Originally posted by keyz:

But I don't really understand why mine needs this filter ... I didn't put this myself...

Did you place your entry in the "nudes" gallery by applying a gallery tag to it when entering it? That's how it would have happened..

R.

yakatme

Lytro Illum Light Field Digital

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED

04/22/2010 11:28:59 AM · #16

Originally posted by Moose408:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Instead of photographers I imagine many people coming across this website would think we are a bunch or prudes!

Based on some of the scores I got for my photo I have reached the conclusion that there are a fair number of prudes here at DPC.

I was wondering, don't you find any of the comments, from the prudes or others, helpful?

keyz

Nikon D700

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G

04/22/2010 11:59:04 AM · #17

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by keyz:

But I don't really understand why mine needs this filter ... I didn't put this myself...

Did you place your entry in the "nudes" gallery by applying a gallery tag to it when entering it? That's how it would have happened..

R.

I didn't place this photo on galleries (still no gallery for this photo).
I'm just sad that we can't show this on the front page of DPC...

Moose408

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

04/22/2010 07:00:23 PM · #18

Originally posted by yakatme:

Originally posted by Moose408:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Instead of photographers I imagine many people coming across this website would think we are a bunch or prudes!

Based on some of the scores I got for my photo I have reached the conclusion that there are a fair number of prudes here at DPC.

I was wondering, don't you find any of the comments, from the prudes or others, helpful?

Well, they were all helpful. Some were helpful in letting me know that some people find pubic hair offensive. Who knew? I don't understand it and would never have predicted the reaction because it doesn't offend me in the least and I had never considered that it would be offensive.

Bear_Music

Samsung Galaxy S21, S21+, S21 Ultra

Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE OSS

04/22/2010 07:07:43 PM · #19

Originally posted by Moose408:

Query: have you ever wondered why there exists a treatment called the "bikini wax"?

R.

Senay

Canon EOS-50D

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

04/22/2010 08:43:17 PM · #20

Hey Moose I think yakatme meant your comments marked as helpful

Comments:
Made: 1,078
Helpful: 818
Received: 915
Helpful: 59

klkitchens

Pentax K-1

Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4 AF

04/22/2010 11:57:50 PM · #21

Originally posted by K10DGuy:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

Oh, and for the record, if you buy a membership, you get to choose whether or not to display that content.

In a lack of good judgment though, this flag is not turned on during voting. We've discussed this at length in the past, but it's still a terrible oversight.

Spork99

Canon EOS M6 Mk II

Canon EF-M 22mm STM Lens

04/23/2010 01:07:04 AM · #22

I mean, really...pictures of naked people...that's so disturbing and offensive. I've never even seen myself naked, I turn off the lights when I get undressed and I've never seen my wife naked either...she turns off the light before she takes off her burqua.

04/23/2010 01:11:16 AM · #23

Originally posted by HawkeyeLonewolf:

Originally posted by K10DGuy:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

Oh, and for the record, if you buy a membership, you get to choose whether or not to display that content.

In a lack of good judgment though, this flag is not turned on during voting. We've discussed this at length in the past, but it's still a terrible oversight.

Why in heck would it be turned on during voting? Like coming up on a "This image hidden due to content" is going to not affect a vote. lol.

That's just silly.

klkitchens

Pentax K-1

Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4 AF

04/23/2010 01:27:31 AM · #24

Originally posted by K10DGuy:

Originally posted by HawkeyeLonewolf:

Originally posted by K10DGuy:

Originally posted by dzone1:
Ok, I didn't realise that. I imagined it must have been a decision of the moderators.

Oh, and for the record, if you buy a membership, you get to choose whether or not to display that content.

In a lack of good judgment though, this flag is not turned on during voting. We've discussed this at length in the past, but it's still a terrible oversight.

Why in heck would it be turned on during voting? Like coming up on a "This image hidden due to content" is going to not affect a vote. lol.

That's just silly.

Not silly at all, but thanks for the insult.

Some of us are allowed to do personal stuff at work, but also don't want nudity coming up on our work machines for the whole world to see.

So it makes the most sense to let us toggle that on and off, even during voting. We're grown ups here, we know when it's appropriate and when it's not.

Moose408