|
| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/07/2009 04:46:20 PM · #76 |
i am not aware about facts of this case but it seems amanda and her partner's story that they told to police did change. (someone correct me if i got this wrong).
i am not sure how many of you are actually ever been accused of murder. But i had such experience. In my last year of school one of my friend committed suicide by jumping in near by lake. The day before he was at my house and then went to other friends house and in night disappeared. His father complained to police that me and my friend has killed him. Well being accused of murder is not pretty. Next day after his body was found, police took our statements. And we told very thing as happened.
Had our stories not matched, i know it was going to be very difficult.
moral of the story if you find someone died, please tell the truth from the start.
(sorry for boring you guys with personal experience). |
|
|
|
12/07/2009 04:50:06 PM · #77 |
Originally posted by zxaar:
i am not aware about facts of this case but it seems amanda and her partner's story that they told to police did change. |
As I heard it, they went so far as to accuse someone else, who was arrested and jailed for two weeks before being cleared. I also heard their story "changed" more than once. |
|
|
|
12/07/2009 04:53:27 PM · #78 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by zxaar:
i am not aware about facts of this case but it seems amanda and her partner's story that they told to police did change. |
As I heard it, they went so far as to accuse someone else, who was arrested and jailed for two weeks before being cleared. I also heard their story "changed" more than once. |
yes this is what i find most stupid, if you have not done it, what is wrong in telling the truth directly.
Murder is not small thing. |
|
|
|
12/07/2009 05:17:17 PM · #79 |
What a strange thread this is, so many armchair lawyers and judges. So many people with all the facts and evidence to hand that they can quote everything about this trial??
Since when did a trial in a 'foreign' country become anti anything? We have witnessed many trials for drug trafficking, murder, piracy and fraud in the news and none have sparked such a knee jerk reaction as this one. Is she guilty or not? I don't know, I haven't seen or heard the evidence, unlike many here who have already stated it was a mis-trial, a fixed verdict.
If there has been a mis-trial, there will be an appeal and everything will be happy ever after and America can turn its paranioa elsewhere. Barrack-room judges and juries will always exist and proclaim their verdicts, regardless of facts and evidence. Let the real courts determine guilt, without the interference of US senators etc!! |
|
|
|
12/07/2009 05:26:56 PM · #80 |
Originally posted by SteveJ:
What a strange thread this is, so many armchair lawyers and judges. So many people with all the facts and evidence to hand that they can quote everything about this trial??
Since when did a trial in a 'foreign' country become anti anything? We have witnessed many trials for drug trafficking, murder, piracy and fraud in the news and none have sparked such a knee jerk reaction as this one. Is she guilty or not? I don't know, I haven't seen or heard the evidence, unlike many here who have already stated it was a mis-trial, a fixed verdict.
If there has been a mis-trial, there will be an appeal and everything will be happy ever after and America can turn its paranioa elsewhere. Barrack-room judges and juries will always exist and proclaim their verdicts, regardless of facts and evidence. Let the real courts determine guilt, without the interference of US senators etc!! |
Um, Steve. Are you reading the same thread as me? I've just quickly gone back over the pages and for the life of me can't find the, 'many here who have already stated it was a mis-trial, a fixed verdict.'. One person has said that she didn't get a fair trial because she was American and got shouted down, and some people have pointed out that there do seem to be suspicions raised by the media, and some elements of the prosecution case as reported do seem a bit odd. I hardly think thats down to ' armchair lawyers and judges' and 'people with all the facts and evidence to hand that they can quote everything about this trial'. Perhaps you should re-read the thread a little closer before throwing accusations around.
Message edited by author 2009-12-07 17:27:42. |
|
|
|
12/07/2009 05:30:43 PM · #81 |
Originally posted by SteveJ:
Let the real courts determine guilt, without the interference of US senators etc!! |
I do agree with you on this though. |
|
|
|
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 02:10:48 PM  |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 02:10:48 PM EDT.
|
