| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/15/2009 10:27:27 AM · #1 |
I just found an interesting article on slashdot:- Computers With Opinions On Visual Aesthetics about Acquine, a computer based photo rating system.
It reckons my current entry in Motivational poster is 78.4, which is much better than the 5.29 I'm currently getting, so how about we let the computer do the voting - no more trolls at least!
edit: if some kind person could correct the spelling mistake in the thread title I'd be obliged.
Message edited by author 2009-05-15 10:28:41. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:37:16 AM · #2 |
This one, which has all good comments, gets an abysmal 25.4 :-)
This one, on the other hand (a ribbon winner) gets a very nice 77.3:
R.
LOL: 17.3 for poor Karma...
3.8, wonderful!:
Message edited by author 2009-05-15 10:44:26. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:37:48 AM · #3 |
Hmmmmm, if you look at this page you can see the top rated. 1st image rated 100/100......it's a silly looking piece of digital art. I'll stick with the human rated system thanks. :)
//acquine.alipr.com/acquine.php?mine=1&start=0&like=vote&ip=_&random=0 |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:42:06 AM · #4 |
| My favorite is that the National Geographic "Afgan Girl" photo was evaluated and scored a 23.... |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:44:03 AM · #5 |
My recent red ribbon winner gets a 25.8
My Best of '08 entry is a 42.3
Everything else I've tried is pathetic.
Added: This one is a 59.1, came in just shy of a 6 in voting here.
My motivation entry is rated as a 79.7. Currently at a 5.45 in voting.
My furniture entry is being rated at 48 by this. Just over a 6 in voting right now.
Message edited by author 2009-05-15 10:50:14. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:46:14 AM · #6 |
I'll take it - it's giving my current 'motivation' entry 89.3/100.
Here, it'll never make a 6, let alone an 8.93 !
|
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:54:16 AM · #7 |
My highest ever score got 7.1here and 10.1 there.
My lowest ever score got 4.2 here and 34.1 there.
 |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 10:56:15 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by paynekj:
I just found an interesting article on slashdot:- Computers With Opinions On Visual Aesthetics about Acquine, a computer based photo rating system.
It reckons my current entry in Motivational poster is 78.4, which is much better than the 5.29 I'm currently getting, so how about we let the computer do the voting - no more trolls at least!
edit: if some kind person could correct the spelling mistake in the thread title I'd be obliged. |
I like this bit from the first article you posted :
When humans assess the aesthetic quality of photos, score inflation is commonly seen. This is probably because we all want to be more encouraging to others. However, Acquine tries to give you a score that is not inflated. That is, the score actually goes from zero to 100, with 50 being the score of a typical average-quality professional photograph. In another word, a photo with a score of 50 is still a good picture. Acquine is tough!
Message edited by author 2009-05-15 10:56:33.
|
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:01:26 AM · #9 |
This likely would have tanked here.
Got a 99.7 there.
That 'system' seems to like darker photos I think.
|
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:04:43 AM · #10 |
I just got a 96 for this one
I win!
|
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:05:30 AM · #11 |
My intentional effort to get a brownie comes in almost as high as my red ribbon winner at 21:
My brown ribbon is a 96! This proves for certain that I am an unappreciated artistic genius!
Message edited by author 2009-05-15 11:05:45. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:06:03 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by kashi:
This likely would have tanked here.
Got a 99.7 there.
That 'system' seems to like darker photos I think. |
4th highest rating! |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:08:09 AM · #13 |
This got 73.6 (finished at 6.05 here).
50 for this (scored 7.21 here)
27.2 for this (score of 6.2 here)
|
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:12:40 AM · #14 |
As yourdictionary.com defines:
aes¡¤thet¡¤ics (es t̸het¡äiks)noun
the study or theory of beauty and of the psychological responses to it; specif., the branch of philosophy dealing with art, its creative sources, its forms, and its effects
and
beauty (byo̵̅o̅t¡ä¨¥)
noun pl. beauties -¡¤ties
the quality attributed to whatever pleases or satisfies the senses or mind, as by line, color, form, texture, proportion, rhythmic motion, tone, etc., or by behavior, attitude, etc.
Computers dont have emotions or psycological responses... Two similar shots of someone with and without a tear "rising" (dont know the right word) in the eye will be completely different to a human or a machine... and all of this depending on the context where that foto is... |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:12:41 AM · #15 |
Very fun! For my highest rated photo here, I got a 35.3:
And for my lowest rated FS ever, I got a 50.7:
Can't get anything above that so far, though. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:14:20 AM · #16 |
| And I can't get any response now, after one going through. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:23:49 AM · #17 |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:33:11 AM · #18 |
 - 19.6 - I guess the program doesn't take humor into consideration.
 - 7.1 - Not sure if I can get much lower than this
 - 85.4 (not my lowest DPC entry but easily my lowest fave)
 - 89.9 - highest ranking I could come up with in my top rated |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:37:23 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
7.1 - Not sure if I can get much lower than this
|
My "Voyager" got 3.8. Maybe *you* can't get lower than 7 but *I* sure can :-)
R. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:40:57 AM · #20 |
My second-most faved got 8.8;
but this got a 97.9 :)
eta; And the only one I've had actually published...
...got 7.7.
Message edited by author 2009-05-15 11:52:19. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:47:50 AM · #21 |
| Leonardo da Vinci´s Monalisa got 28.8 |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:50:16 AM · #22 |
| I think we have established the accuracy of this system. A work in progress for sure. |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:53:24 AM · #23 |
I prefer the human voters.... Computers dont buy pictures.
And.... if someone points this out as wrong, and computers do buy pictures, let me know how I can get them to buy mine :) |
|
|
|
05/15/2009 11:56:58 AM · #24 |
For the record, this pic on that site got a 70.5.
|
|
|
|
05/15/2009 12:00:31 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by jotaga:
Leonardo da Vinci´s Monalisa got 28.8 |
Personally, I think that's about right; I never understood the accolades that painting gets :-)
R. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/17/2024 10:16:16 PM EDT.
