DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Tamron 18-270mm VC lens
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 5 of 5, (reverse)
AuthorThread
02/01/2009 04:10:46 PM · #1
Hasanyone had a lot of luck with this lens or what is your opinion. Personally It seems slower than it has been promoted to be. Thought it was me or perhaps that I got a fluke lens that just didn't work properly. Walked through the process with Tamron rep and it wasn't me. Sent it in and the response was that the lens was working as it was designed to work. any other opinions out there. Maybe I am still missing something. I have never had a lens rattle this much either.
02/25/2009 04:02:21 PM · #2
I got this Tamron about a month ago. You're right, it has some slop (rattle) to it. If I'm holding it level, it's sticky in mid-range zooming in and out; worse if lens is point up and zooming out (tele) - pointing down and zooming in (wide angle). My experience has been that it's slow focusing on moving subjects that are going away from me or coming toward me, so have missed some shots... Its hasn't been as "bad" on laterally moving subjects where the distance is relatively the same so the lens has less focus hunting.

I haven't done any low light shooting with it so I can't comment on focusing issues in low light conditions.

I've worked around the sticking points while zooming by having gravity help; pointing up to zoom wide, pointing down to zoom tele.
I'm still undecided if the Tamron is as sharp as my Nikon 18-200. Some images are nice and sharp (nice on stationary subjects), but on moving subjects??? it's hit and miss.
On the plus side, the Tamron seems to have less vignetting than the Nikon when extended out.
What's you're opinion on sharpness?

By the way, most of my shots were on my D60, some on my D300. Most shots on the tele end on shutter priority.

Update 02/27/09.
Another way I'm working around the slow focus issues/focus hunting is to just switch to manual focus. But of course that would be mostly for non (or slow) moving subjects.
Oh ya, I'm getting the infamous lens creep when the lens is pointed down... Oh well... live and learn about buying stuff...

Message edited by author 2009-02-28 04:44:03.
03/01/2009 10:15:11 PM · #3
I haven't experienced to much lens creep and thesticking is more withthe focus than anything. Sometimes I will try to focus and the motor will buzz. That's usually when I realize I've been trying to take fast moving shots with the VC engaged. I have had some macro stuff comeout nice and sharp, but with that type of photo use I've never experienced a big need for fast focus as much as just cadilacing.

You're right about the vignetting. There is very little unless you are shooting in broad light without a flower. then youget the flairs as well. I have shot some specifically for the lens flair with this lens. It is an awesome effect if you are about 17 degrees off of the main light or the sun. In one shot it did a ring around the lens with my subject in the clear at the center of the lens. I was focused at 57mm (so 91mm digital equivalent with the D90)with the sun at 22 degrees.

The lens does some unique things, but I am sure that none of it was intended by Tamron. I would almost believe that they released this lens merely on the need built by research and development cost. Not a very sound business practice when you think about how much they pushed the range in marketing. they probably should have put it out with a full ring instead of a flower because of the flair angles. The funny thing is, it is coming off of the second element not the main focal.
03/13/2009 03:34:42 PM · #4
Now that I've used this on my D300 and D60, I would have to say pass on this one if you're looking for a super zoom. Its slow to focus and lock on moving subjects, the zoom will frustrate you because it sticks midrange, and I'm thinking the slop (rattle) of the lens during shutter actuation may contribute to the images not being as sharp. The extra 70mm reach is negligible. I'm going back to the Nikon 18-200vr for my walk around lens.
03/13/2009 04:14:05 PM · #5
I was so tempted to get this lens when I got the D90, but I went by photozone.de reviews and got the 18-105mmVR kit lens and the 70-300mm VR for the long reach. After reading about the general purpose zooms, I dont think I regret my decision.

I am learning slowly that the more general purpose you want a lens to be, the more you will have to sacrifice on image quality among other things. There must be a reason why people drool over fast primes:-)
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 03:39:40 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 03:39:40 AM EDT.