DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Side Challenges and Tournaments >> The 1x Reject Club
Pages:   ... ... [100]
Showing posts 251 - 275 of 2494, (reverse)
AuthorThread
01/18/2009 08:13:31 PM · #251
Photo #1 - rejected
Photo #2 - published
Photo #3 - published (but it was in screening for twice as long as the others)
01/18/2009 08:29:56 PM · #252


Rejected: impact
01/18/2009 08:45:39 PM · #253
Originally posted by KarenNfld:

Photo #1 - rejected
Photo #2 - published
Photo #3 - published (but it was in screening for twice as long as the others)


I saw the starfish one. Kudos for going with color! :)
01/18/2009 09:09:08 PM · #254
Originally posted by DrAchoo:


I saw the starfish one. Kudos for going with color! :)


Thanks, it kinda sticks out like a sore thumb on the page though. :)
01/18/2009 09:19:57 PM · #255
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

Originally posted by KarenNfld:

Photo #1 - rejected
Photo #2 - published
Photo #3 - published (but it was in screening for twice as long as the others)


I saw the starfish one. Kudos for going with color! :)


your point about black and white and OE is pretty correct (in my opinion).
For me black and white is just a way to mask my lack of talent. I can not imagine getting through with color image at OE. I find it too difficult to do.
01/18/2009 09:33:54 PM · #256
Originally posted by KarenNfld:

Originally posted by DrAchoo:


I saw the starfish one. Kudos for going with color! :)


Thanks, it kinda sticks out like a sore thumb on the page though. :)


Grats! Fits in pretty well right now. 8/10 in Latest Additions are color.
01/19/2009 05:36:16 AM · #257
I don't know what the site statistics for color vs. B&W on 1x is - but for my own part I got more color than B/W - monotone accepted:

32 colors accepted
16 B/W - monotone accepted

...and 20 rejected. (19 of them color)

So even if most of my published pictures are color, my acceptance ration on B&W is much higher.
01/19/2009 06:20:26 AM · #258
loving that site. The quality does blow DPC away! beautiful AND meaningful
01/19/2009 06:38:15 AM · #259
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

loving that site. The quality does blow DPC away! beautiful AND meaningful


I absolutely agree :)
01/19/2009 10:15:25 AM · #260
This was in screening for a long time but finally was rejected...

01/19/2009 12:57:02 PM · #261
Originally posted by zxaar:

Originally posted by freakin_hilarious:

Rejection #2:



this is really garbage. I wonder why you even thought of publishing it anywhere.


I forgive you for your rudeness since English is obviously not your first language.

Oh, yeah. Rejection #3:

01/19/2009 01:31:39 PM · #262
I don't have alot of my images uploaded here too yet, but this one was rejected:



Reason why:
Of those who voted against your image, six indicated that there is a problem with light, four noted impact as a weakness and two selected motif as a reason for not publishing the image.

Another one:



Reason why:
Of those who voted against your image, nine indicated that there is a problem with impact, four noted light as a weakness and two selected motif as a reason for not publishing the image.

I was quite pleased with the lighting on both, but what do I know...
01/19/2009 05:18:57 PM · #263
Originally posted by freakin_hilarious:

Originally posted by zxaar:

Originally posted by freakin_hilarious:

Rejection #2:



this is really garbage. I wonder why you even thought of publishing it anywhere.


I forgive you for your rudeness since English is obviously not your first language.



i am sorry if it sounded rude.

About that photo
1. Subject matter - no idea what you wanted to shoot, it resembles garbage. if you wanted to say something esoteric then i missed it and you failed as a photographer.
2. composition - i could not see anything great with it, it is ordinary at the best. focus seems to be everywhere and not everywhere too.
3. post processing - this is the only thing in this photo, as if someone took garbage and beat a photo out of it. Anyway post processing itself is ordinary.

Yaa being away from dpc for around a year i forgot here i am supposed to lªªk other's a** as people are not used to honest reactions.

I know since you shoot it it is dear to you, but it is not great. Have a look at it after few months and try to think what i said.
ps: you have scored a ribbon here so you are not dud photog, just that this your experiment is very bad (my opinion)
01/19/2009 05:42:51 PM · #264
Rejected:
01/19/2009 05:47:38 PM · #265
Originally posted by KarenNfld:

Rejected:

It's because it's not in rich, joyous, wondrous KarenNfld color! :-)
01/19/2009 06:00:53 PM · #266
OK, this one annoys me quite a bit.

A 950 version of this (slightly less sharp):


Of those who voted against your image, one indicated that there is a problem with technical quality, one noted impact as a weakness and one selected motif as a reason for not publishing the image.
01/19/2009 06:26:49 PM · #267
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

OK, this one annoys me quite a bit.


Why do you care so much? It seems mostly at the mercy of a select few even with the member voting element.
01/19/2009 06:36:09 PM · #268
Originally posted by Nuzzer:

Originally posted by DrAchoo:

OK, this one annoys me quite a bit.


Why do you care so much? It seems mostly at the mercy of a select few even with the member voting element.


Because I'm a competitive individual. Plus nobody likes what appears, to them at least, as unfair treatment. I don't see this shot as being of lower technical quality, impact, or motif than many of the macros published. Other than the orange background it seems to fit right in.
01/19/2009 08:22:36 PM · #269
up for screening. Seemed to be the most likely pic in my hard drive....
01/19/2009 10:20:52 PM · #270
Originally posted by Nuzzer:

Originally posted by DrAchoo:

OK, this one annoys me quite a bit.


Why do you care so much? It seems mostly at the mercy of a select few even with the member voting element.


This thread is interesting in that it reveals something. Much like here when people struggle to win a ribbon there is a tendency to start making excuses and then devalue the very thing they seek (i.e. the ribbon). Same thing is happening with those trying to get in at 1x. It's a struggle followed by excuses and devaluation. Rather than do that assume your work isn't as good as you thought and look for ways to make it better. It is the only way one improves.

P.S. This isn't directed at you personally. I'm just using your post as a jumping point since yours speaks to the very thing I've observed.
01/19/2009 10:25:15 PM · #271
Agreed Richard. However, it's possible one's style differs enough that 1x represents a different road. To be accepted there doesn't reflect "improvement" as much as "change". I'm not saying I have all the skill I need and I don't need to strive to improve. Harldy. But I'm getting the picture (quite clearly) that my style doesn't work at 1x. Instead of abandoning the progress I've made in the 3 years I've been here and trying to hop on the 1x express, I think I should just continue to progress along the road I've chosen.

De Sousa gave a name to my road. I am a "pop artist". 1x does not encourage pop art.
01/19/2009 10:45:18 PM · #272
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

De Sousa gave a name to my road. I am a "pop artist". 1x does not encourage pop art.


Well there's the problem. You have others naming your road. :P
01/19/2009 10:49:30 PM · #273
I've just uploaded my third. I'm fairly certain it will get rejected, but I'm wanting to see if I can "predict" *why.*

If I can/did, I think I have a better idea of what to do 'next time.'
01/19/2009 10:51:53 PM · #274
Originally posted by yanko:

Originally posted by DrAchoo:

De Sousa gave a name to my road. I am a "pop artist". 1x does not encourage pop art.


Well there's the problem. You have others naming your road. :P


It's nice to have friends help you. I was struggling to name the road myself. The "Thomas Kincade of Photography" didn't roll over the tongue as nicely as "Pop Artist".
01/19/2009 11:07:05 PM · #275
Originally posted by yanko:

Originally posted by Nuzzer:

Originally posted by DrAchoo:

OK, this one annoys me quite a bit.


Why do you care so much? It seems mostly at the mercy of a select few even with the member voting element.


This thread is interesting in that it reveals something. Much like here when people struggle to win a ribbon there is a tendency to start making excuses and then devalue the very thing they seek (i.e. the ribbon). Same thing is happening with those trying to get in at 1x. It's a struggle followed by excuses and devaluation. Rather than do that assume your work isn't as good as you thought and look for ways to make it better. It is the only way one improves.

P.S. This isn't directed at you personally. I'm just using your post as a jumping point since yours speaks to the very thing I've observed.


Sure, not taken personally. I did create an account but hadn't tried to upload anything until today. I selected an image I thought might have been their taste but it was rejected as being "too edited" - that made me laugh as a large number of shots on 1x seem to be overly edited. I don't think I'll try again.

My question for the Doc was more about why he was getting annoyed about it rather than making excuses for not being on 1x's front page.
Pages:   ... ... [100]
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 02:22:40 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 02:22:40 PM EDT.