Author | Thread |
|
01/11/2009 08:55:52 AM · #301 |
11. for Jon - Death is Not the End
|
|
|
01/11/2009 08:56:30 AM · #302 |
photoshop action...what do you think about it? |
|
|
01/11/2009 10:45:46 AM · #303 |
11 of 31 and its off to candid land, something I tend not to be comfortable doing.
|
|
|
01/11/2009 11:07:43 AM · #304 |
|
|
01/11/2009 11:17:41 AM · #305 |
Originally posted by JuliBoc:
I took so many shots today and most of them had lousy focus. Very disappointing. I'll have to be more careful next time. |
You may be worrying too much about the concept "focus"? I'm not sure ANY of mine thus far have sharp sweet spot, certainly none of the recent ones; I am deliberately avoiding it for now. Of course, I may be out of my mind, but...
In the example above, I don't think the sharp focus on the berries is doing us any good at all, it just makes the blurred aspect of the palms look arbitrary, not really integral to the visioning of the image.
R.
|
|
|
01/11/2009 12:20:12 PM · #306 |
Took a flight over Siberia this morning, got this shot:
R.
|
|
|
01/11/2009 12:25:09 PM · #307 |
I am so behind!
This is challenging me to be more creative though. I love it.
Here's my iron. ;)
|
|
|
01/11/2009 01:14:36 PM · #308 |
LB#7 - Another one with the +4 macro.
|
|
|
01/11/2009 01:57:05 PM · #309 |
|
|
01/11/2009 02:38:28 PM · #310 |
Originally posted by Jutilda: Does anyone have the optic box attachments that are available with some of the Composer packages??? |
shhhh, I just got the single glass, plastic and pinhole/zoneplate kit. Still to use the pinhole/zoneplate and currently practising on changing the elements whilst trying to look cool ;) |
|
|
01/11/2009 07:21:10 PM · #311 |
I was haunted today by RKT's photo of a ladder. An item so simple and ordinary made mesmerizing, memorable. All I could do was head back out to the practice field.
|
|
|
01/11/2009 08:20:44 PM · #312 |
Might be my last one for the week. Hopefully I'll get out a few times to shoot, depending on work and the weather. Cheers! |
|
|
01/11/2009 11:08:05 PM · #313 |
took more shots today, so will have some "real" shots soon
will work on the comment backlog tomorrow... |
|
|
01/11/2009 11:20:26 PM · #314 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by JuliBoc:
I took so many shots today and most of them had lousy focus. Very disappointing. I'll have to be more careful next time. |
You may be worrying too much about the concept "focus"? I'm not sure ANY of mine thus far have sharp sweet spot, certainly none of the recent ones; I am deliberately avoiding it for now. Of course, I may be out of my mind, but...
In the example above, I don't think the sharp focus on the berries is doing us any good at all, it just makes the blurred aspect of the palms look arbitrary, not really integral to the visioning of the image.
R. |
Okay, back to the drawing board. Tomorrow, I won't worry so much about focus, and I'll see what I get. I never was any good at manual focus anyway. Thanks |
|
|
01/11/2009 11:21:28 PM · #315 |
Day 11:
|
|
|
01/11/2009 11:52:27 PM · #316 |
|
|
01/12/2009 01:09:56 AM · #317 |
|
|
01/12/2009 06:13:38 AM · #318 |
12. tumble
|
|
|
01/12/2009 09:22:05 AM · #319 |
day 12 |
|
|
01/12/2009 09:28:41 AM · #320 |
|
|
01/12/2009 01:09:31 PM · #321 |
Got this on the way home from the hand surgeon today. I even used the sweet spot!
R.
|
|
|
01/12/2009 02:06:47 PM · #322 |
Originally posted by Rino63: photoshop action...what do you think about it? |
As an effect, I can see some appeal in the image, but as a LB simulation it doesn't cut it at all. It looks more like extreme radial (zoom) blur.
I have only attempted a lensbaby effect in PS one time and didn't think it was even close enough to pass of as an LB shot:
Let me know what you think?
I do believe I could come up with a PS action that could come close, and I had it in my mind before I got an LB that PS action would be better because I would always have the original, unblurrified image to do other things with. But I have since changed my tune - the LB seems to create images that aren't and can't be seen through a normal lens even after hours of processing.
I'll have some *real* shots to post in a day or two. Carry on. |
|
|
01/12/2009 02:13:26 PM · #323 |
day 12 and I have a headache so have uploaded a barely edited JPEG, let the guessing commence ;)
|
|
|
01/12/2009 02:26:10 PM · #324 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao: Originally posted by Rino63: photoshop action...what do you think about it? |
As an effect, I can see some appeal in the image, but as a LB simulation it doesn't cut it at all. It looks more like extreme radial (zoom) blur.
I have only attempted a lensbaby effect in PS one time and didn't think it was even close enough to pass of as an LB shot:
Let me know what you think?
I do believe I could come up with a PS action that could come close, and I had it in my mind before I got an LB that PS action would be better because I would always have the original, unblurrified image to do other things with. But I have since changed my tune - the LB seems to create images that aren't and can't be seen through a normal lens even after hours of processing.
I'll have some *real* shots to post in a day or two. Carry on. |
I was wondering about this, too. Until/Unless someone creates a fairly complex plug-in/effect, I think the average post-processing will provide the oddly shaped focus sweet spot, but not the distortion/stretching of the oof areas caused by the lens tilt/swing. |
|
|
01/12/2009 02:33:26 PM · #325 |
Originally posted by chromeydome:
I was wondering about this, too. Until/Unless someone creates a fairly complex plug-in/effect, I think the average post-processing will provide the oddly shaped focus sweet spot, but not the distortion/stretching of the oof areas caused by the lens tilt/swing. |
I can't find it now, but somewhere on the Lensbaby site is a quote to the effect that a couple of super-esteemed Photoshop gurus have averred that there is no way to faithfully duplicate what LB does in Photoshop; that, furthermore, it would defeat the purpose of the thing as well :-)
R.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 01:24:20 PM EDT.