DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> 5D Mark II RELEASED!!!!
Pages:  
Showing posts 151 - 175 of 206, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/23/2008 12:54:03 AM · #151
Here is a direct link to the Canon site where the video "everyone is talking about" (by Vincent Laforet) can be found.

Enjoy!

Message edited by author 2008-09-23 00:54:34.
09/23/2008 02:06:19 AM · #152
Originally posted by dwterry:

Here is a direct link to the Canon site where the video "everyone is talking about" (by Vincent Laforet) can be found.

Enjoy!


Holy freaking crap. We may have to have a secondary DMC site after this...
09/23/2008 02:57:57 AM · #153
Originally posted by kirbic:

Originally posted by Mick:

I love early adopters. They're like guinea pigs with credit cards. :D


It's true they incur some risk... I normally don't jump early for that precise reason, but I broke my rule when the 5D was announced, and three years later I'm very happy I did, even though I paid MSRP. Given the introductory price for the 5DII, it is tempting to jump again, but I won't since the 5D is still doing exceptionally well for me. I *will* very seriously look at the 5DII in the Spring, once we have a few months of experience with it. By that time I'll have updated my computer and perhaps it will actually be able to deal with the monster files from that thing :-P

I was just joking around. Actually, I would already have a 5DII on order if I wasn't afraid of my wife. :D

One of the really nice things about buying bodies early is that you get to enjoy them for a whole year or two before they're outdated.

09/23/2008 05:04:08 AM · #154
so my question remains from earlier in this thread - since it runs at 3.5 fps on 21mp, if Canon wanted to let it run at say 6 fps on sRAW, would that be a hardware issue or could they release a software fix to bump the speed ?

I think it would increase the versatility even more if you could kept the slower frame rate for Portraits, Landscapes etc - but could up it for smaller faster action type shots.
09/23/2008 06:57:47 AM · #155
Originally posted by Jedusi:

so my question remains from earlier in this thread - since it runs at 3.5 fps on 21mp, if Canon wanted to let it run at say 6 fps on sRAW, would that be a hardware issue or could they release a software fix to bump the speed ?

I think it would increase the versatility even more if you could kept the slower frame rate for Portraits, Landscapes etc - but could up it for smaller faster action type shots.


It could be a mechanical, hardware or marketing issue. Mechanical if the shutter/pentaprism isn't up to it (to save cost :-O ), hardware if the bottleneck is getting all that info off the sensor (resizing being done later) or marketing if someone wants clear water between the 5DII and the 1D.

Only Canon know for sure, and I bet they won't say :-)
09/23/2008 09:01:11 AM · #156
Originally posted by MilesW:

Originally posted by Jedusi:

so my question remains from earlier in this thread - since it runs at 3.5 fps on 21mp, if Canon wanted to let it run at say 6 fps on sRAW, would that be a hardware issue or could they release a software fix to bump the speed ?

I think it would increase the versatility even more if you could kept the slower frame rate for Portraits, Landscapes etc - but could up it for smaller faster action type shots.


It could be a mechanical, hardware or marketing issue. Mechanical if the shutter/pentaprism isn't up to it (to save cost :-O ), hardware if the bottleneck is getting all that info off the sensor (resizing being done later) or marketing if someone wants clear water between the 5DII and the 1D.

Only Canon know for sure, and I bet they won't say :-)


Hmmm -

1)Mechanical - the shutter not being upto it - hmmm think I'll discount this when both the 50D below it and the 1D3 above it can both manage that speed.

2)hardware if the bottleneck is getting all that info off the sensor (resizing being done later) - possibly.

3) marketing if someone wants clear water between the 5DII and the 1D. Seems more likely, but the question is whether they want to keep clear water between their own products - or clear water between themselves and Nikon. If it is the latter it might pay them to think about it.
09/23/2008 09:06:48 AM · #157
Originally posted by kirbic:

Also check this... Vincent Laforet had his hands on a 5DII for 72 hours and managed to produce a video in that time. He's looking for a place to host it. Read down for his comments on the performance of the 5DII in video mode.


The video is finally out, being hosted by SmugMug. I know zip about video, but it looks phenomenal to me. I've cancelled my 50D order btw.
09/23/2008 09:29:46 AM · #158
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

Originally posted by dwterry:

Here is a direct link to the Canon site where the video "everyone is talking about" (by Vincent Laforet) can be found.

Enjoy!


Holy freaking crap. We may have to have a secondary DMC site after this...


You can say that again, Batman! That video is incredible!
09/23/2008 09:38:57 AM · #159
Originally posted by Jedusi:


Hmmm -

1)Mechanical - the shutter not being upto it - hmmm think I'll discount this when both the 50D below it and the 1D3 above it can both manage that speed.

TO get the higher shutter speeds of the 40D,1D3, etc they use two motors on the shutter - one to open and one to close. They don't need the expense/complexity/failure potential of that on at 3 or 4 FPS.

Originally posted by Jedusi:


2)hardware if the bottleneck is getting all that info off the sensor (resizing being done later) - possibly.

Hardware as in buffer should not be a problem at the lower resolutions - they could certainly do sRAW or JPGs at a faster rate if they wanted to.

Originally posted by Jedusi:


3) marketing if someone wants clear water between the 5DII and the 1D. Seems more likely, but the question is whether they want to keep clear water between their own products - or clear water between themselves and Nikon. If it is the latter it might pay them to think about it.


Some nikons (D80 for one) don't use a mechanical shutter for everything they do - they can HSS sync at 1/8000 because of this, like P&S cameras don't have a shutter. And during live view there is no closed shutter just like a P&S, so it's most certainly possible. The use the mirrors in the pentaprism assembly for focus on SLRs so that might have to be changed to focus with the shutter open. Nikon uses some sort of focusing scheme but it's not fast. Don't know what if anything canon has done for focusing in movie mode - perhaps it's all manual?
09/23/2008 10:26:27 AM · #160
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:

Originally posted by Jedusi:


2)hardware if the bottleneck is getting all that info off the sensor (resizing being done later) - possibly.

Hardware as in buffer should not be a problem at the lower resolutions - they could certainly do sRAW or JPGs at a faster rate if they wanted to.

Given everything I've read, getting 21MP worth of data off the sensor is almost certainly the bottleneck. And it's more than likely that the highly developed circuits to perform these reads doesn't simply scale linearly, i.e. because certain processes are serialized. Besides, if you expect sRAW to have less noise, it needs to get all the data off the sensor, then scale the image down.

However, they obviously have some mechanism of getting smaller images off the sensor faster, as evidenced by movie mode (1920x1080 at 30fps). But my guess is that is a highly specialized case and the argument doesn't hold linearly on the resolution scale.
09/23/2008 10:40:07 AM · #161
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

Originally posted by dwterry:

Here is a direct link to the Canon site where the video "everyone is talking about" (by Vincent Laforet) can be found.

Enjoy!


Holy freaking crap. We may have to have a secondary DMC site after this...


oh YEAH!!! you getting one Doc? I know I am after seeing this.

Message edited by author 2008-09-23 10:40:14.
09/23/2008 11:29:07 AM · #162
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

Originally posted by DrAchoo:

Originally posted by dwterry:

Here is a direct link to the Canon site where the video "everyone is talking about" (by Vincent Laforet) can be found.

Enjoy!


Holy freaking crap. We may have to have a secondary DMC site after this...


oh YEAH!!! you getting one Doc? I know I am after seeing this.


I won't be pre-ordering. Funds are tight at the moment. But I'm hoping maybe early spring.
09/23/2008 11:51:51 AM · #163
yeah should have dropped a 2 or 3 hundred dollars by then
09/23/2008 11:58:17 AM · #164
maybe we should arrange a gtg in America for all the Brits to go and buy their 5DII's - and still save money on the UK price :- )
09/23/2008 03:12:22 PM · #165
Does anyone know if there is a crop factor for the video, or does it use the full 35mm sensor size?
09/23/2008 03:23:05 PM · #166
this camera looks amazing..... i think this may be my next one sometime in the future.... lol cant stop drooling over it
09/23/2008 03:31:38 PM · #167
Placed my order earlier today at canogacamera.com - the lady said that they have pre-orders for maybe 25 units so far and that they never know how many of any product that Canon will ship to them. It'll almost certainly be back-ordered for awhile.

edit to add: ...so in the meantime I'm shopping for a computer to handle it! One site said that the video function records about 47 megabits (?) per second!

Message edited by author 2008-09-23 15:33:20.
09/23/2008 05:01:54 PM · #168
I was planning on pre-ordering one too, but I got laid off a few weeks ago. No jobs for me anywhere.. I guess I have to wait. I hope I find work soon. I need to pay rent, then buy this camera!
09/23/2008 05:21:23 PM · #169
Gonna get this.. damn, can you imagine the possibilities with this beast..

Where are all the Nikon owners now.. conspicuous by their very absence.. :)

Saberi - can you image some of the imagery you could capture at Richmond on a misty Autumnal morning with a 70-200 f2.8 attached.. oh man.

09/23/2008 05:29:35 PM · #170
Originally posted by Simms:

Gonna get this.. damn, can you imagine the possibilities with this beast..

Where are all the Nikon owners now.. conspicuous by their very absence.. :)

Saberi - can you image some of the imagery you could capture at Richmond on a misty Autumnal morning with a 70-200 f2.8 attached.. oh man.


forget that - what about our home videos. imagine the possibilities! oh YEAH!!!
09/23/2008 05:30:22 PM · #171
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

Originally posted by Simms:

Gonna get this.. damn, can you imagine the possibilities with this beast..

Where are all the Nikon owners now.. conspicuous by their very absence.. :)

Saberi - can you image some of the imagery you could capture at Richmond on a misty Autumnal morning with a 70-200 f2.8 attached.. oh man.


forget that - what about our home videos. imagine the possibilities! oh YEAH!!!


oh wow!! have to put a macro lens on the list as well now.. worth it though.
09/23/2008 05:31:57 PM · #172
Originally posted by Simms:

Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

Originally posted by Simms:

Gonna get this.. damn, can you imagine the possibilities with this beast..

Where are all the Nikon owners now.. conspicuous by their very absence.. :)

Saberi - can you image some of the imagery you could capture at Richmond on a misty Autumnal morning with a 70-200 f2.8 attached.. oh man.


forget that - what about our home videos. imagine the possibilities! oh YEAH!!!


oh wow!! have to put a macro lens on the list as well now.. worth it though.


I will make u look good with my 16-35. :-)

Message edited by author 2008-09-23 17:32:19.
09/23/2008 05:32:49 PM · #173
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

Originally posted by Simms:

Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

Originally posted by Simms:

Gonna get this.. damn, can you imagine the possibilities with this beast..

Where are all the Nikon owners now.. conspicuous by their very absence.. :)

Saberi - can you image some of the imagery you could capture at Richmond on a misty Autumnal morning with a 70-200 f2.8 attached.. oh man.


forget that - what about our home videos. imagine the possibilities! oh YEAH!!!


oh wow!! have to put a macro lens on the list as well now.. worth it though.


I will make u look good with my 16-35. :-)


har de har har
09/23/2008 05:33:41 PM · #174
TMI from the UK crew. =)

Originally posted by scarbrd:

Does anyone know if there is a crop factor for the video, or does it use the full 35mm sensor size?

From the looks of the DPReview screenshots, it looks like it uses the whole sensor (aka, whole field of view of the lens), minus top-and-bottom for 16:9, and minus the sides for 4:3.

...
09/23/2008 06:03:12 PM · #175
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:

Originally posted by Simms:



oh wow!! have to put a macro lens on the list as well now.. worth it though.


I will make u look good with my 16-35. :-)


Geez....now you are just dreaming.....no camera is that good...hehehehe!!
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 04:43:25 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 04:43:25 PM EDT.