Author | Thread |
|
09/18/2008 11:06:32 AM · #51 |
Votes: 100
Views: 201
Avg Vote: 5.1400
Comments: 9
Favorites: 1
Votes: 101
Views: 202
Avg Vote: 5.0990
Comments: 9
Favorites: 1
:(
|
|
|
09/18/2008 12:54:13 PM · #52 |
holding my own
very confused comments
Votes: 101
Views: 170
Avg Vote: 3.8416
Comments: 5
lady tara doesnt know whats happening around her
and for SHAMAN the least say the better
Message edited by author 2008-09-18 13:21:21. |
|
|
09/18/2008 01:10:58 PM · #53 |
Originally posted by mchalmers: Votes: 104
Views: 164
Avg Vote: 6.3077
Comments: 4
Favorites: 1
____________________ |
Good going, Mark. Congratualtions. Too bad it doesn't count for the Olympics. now you'll have to do the same for next week. Well done. |
|
|
09/18/2008 01:36:13 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by posthumous: Originally posted by atupdate:
I promise to give a comment to all the 4's and lower I give out in this challenge. Now I need to see how many I can bump up to a 5. ;-) |
I look forward to your comment! |
ha, you liked it in spite of yourself... :D
Safety
Votes: 98
Views: 173
Avg Vote: 3.7347
Comments: 3
Favorites: 1
sorry to steal your (brown) thunder, cutout... |
|
|
09/18/2008 01:41:17 PM · #55 |
If it is the one I fav'd in this challenge, yes I did. I like it a lot.
Originally posted by posthumous: Originally posted by posthumous: Originally posted by atupdate:
I promise to give a comment to all the 4's and lower I give out in this challenge. Now I need to see how many I can bump up to a 5. ;-) |
I look forward to your comment! |
ha, you liked it in spite of yourself... :D
Safety
Votes: 98
Views: 173
Avg Vote: 3.7347
Comments: 3
Favorites: 1
sorry to steal your (brown) thunder, cutout... |
|
|
|
09/18/2008 01:43:29 PM · #56 |
Originally posted by atupdate: If it is the one I fav'd in this challenge, yes I did. I like it a lot. |
No comment.
(I'm playing it safe.) |
|
|
09/18/2008 01:55:07 PM · #57 |
maybe thats what i should do |
|
|
09/18/2008 02:06:28 PM · #58 |
Originally posted by cutout: holding my own
very confused comments
Votes: 101
Views: 170
Avg Vote: 3.8416
Comments: 5
lady tara doesnt know whats happening around her
and for SHAMAN the least say the better |
Eh....?
|
|
|
09/18/2008 02:36:57 PM · #59 |
Originally posted by Shaman: Good going, Mark. Congratualtions. Too bad it doesn't count for the Olympics. now you'll have to do the same for next week. Well done. |
Thanks! Just getting geared up for the Olympics.. But you watch; next weeks will absolutely tank! :)
Votes: 118
Views: 192
Avg Vote: 6.3729
Comments: 6
Favorites: 1
|
|
|
09/18/2008 04:27:49 PM · #60 |
Votes: 113
Views: 179
Avg Vote: 6.0354
Comments: 9
All good comments but the score did not move.
|
|
|
09/18/2008 08:16:35 PM · #61 |
As a personal rule, I dont vote in a challenge I take part in. This one I can, and so I just finished:
You have rated 86 of 86 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 86 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 6.1977
Good luck guys!
|
|
|
09/18/2008 08:45:11 PM · #62 |
Votes: 114
Views: 194
Avg Vote: 5.3509
Comments: 8
*sigh* |
|
|
09/18/2008 09:17:53 PM · #63 |
uh oh... I'm up to 3.9
d&mn trolls!! |
|
|
09/18/2008 10:55:20 PM · #64 |
but i got the cherry on the cake
Meets the challenge: 0
Color and lighting: 1
Focus and DOF: 0
Originality: 1
Camera angle: 1
Aesthetic appeal: 1
this is a comment by our hilarious bagman
and iam at 3.9
the bagman must be our talkative PRASH
Message edited by author 2008-09-18 23:04:05. |
|
|
09/18/2008 11:10:24 PM · #65 |
Originally posted by cutout:
Meets the challenge: 0
Color and lighting: 1
Focus and DOF: 0
Originality: 1
Camera angle: 1
Aesthetic appeal: 1
this is a comment by our hilarious bagman |
That's not a "comment", that's just a pile of statistics... |
|
|
09/18/2008 11:54:27 PM · #66 |
Originally posted by glad2badad: Originally posted by cutout:
Meets the challenge: 0
Color and lighting: 1
Focus and DOF: 0
Originality: 1
Camera angle: 1
Aesthetic appeal: 1
this is a comment by our hilarious bagman |
That's not a "comment", that's just a pile of statistics... |
It is still better than no comment at all. It shows the strengths and weaknesses of the picture categorically and quantitatively.. better than a "DNMC" or a "Great pic, great DOF" IMO.
|
|
|
09/18/2008 11:58:09 PM · #67 |
I think it's a valid comment - it indeed does tell a lot about what that particular viewer thinks about the picture. The categories and stats together show what the viewer is looking for/at and how that photograph meets (or doesn't meet) those criteria. |
|
|
09/19/2008 12:25:25 AM · #68 |
Here is my latest and greatest. At least its going in the right direction.
Votes: 123
Views: 194
Avg Vote: 6.2846
Comments: 9
Favorites: 0 |
|
|
09/19/2008 03:12:02 AM · #69 |
Originally posted by Prash: Originally posted by glad2badad: Originally posted by cutout:
Meets the challenge: 0
Color and lighting: 1
Focus and DOF: 0
Originality: 1
Camera angle: 1
Aesthetic appeal: 1
this is a comment by our hilarious bagman |
That's not a "comment", that's just a pile of statistics... |
It is still better than no comment at all. It shows the strengths and weaknesses of the picture categorically and quantitatively.. better than a "DNMC" or a "Great pic, great DOF" IMO. |
Prash - there's certainly some logic in what you're saying. What I don't understand though is why you would have 6 categories to give out 10 points ? It means that if you give any one of the categories a two or above, other categories must remain mathematically empty . . |
|
|
09/19/2008 03:16:24 AM · #70 |
Originally posted by Jedusi: Originally posted by Prash: Originally posted by glad2badad: Originally posted by cutout:
Meets the challenge: 0
Color and lighting: 1
Focus and DOF: 0
Originality: 1
Camera angle: 1
Aesthetic appeal: 1
this is a comment by our hilarious bagman |
That's not a "comment", that's just a pile of statistics... |
It is still better than no comment at all. It shows the strengths and weaknesses of the picture categorically and quantitatively.. better than a "DNMC" or a "Great pic, great DOF" IMO. |
Prash - there's certainly some logic in what you're saying. What I don't understand though is why you would have 6 categories to give out 10 points ? It means that if you give any one of the categories a two or above, other categories must remain mathematically empty . . |
Valid question. I have a maximum of 5 for the 'Meets the challenge' category. Rest are all given out of a maximum 1 point. So if an entry weakly meets the challenge, it might get a 3 lets say in that criterion, still leaving room for a total of 7/10. Hope that helps a bit. Again, these are just my criteria.
Message edited by author 2008-09-19 03:17:57.
|
|
|
09/19/2008 03:26:06 AM · #71 |
Meets the challenge: 5
Color and lighting: 1
Focus and DOF: 1
Originality: 1
Camera angle: 0
Aesthetic appeal: 0
Really helpful... if only I could understand the SCALE!
Message edited by author 2008-09-19 03:26:30. |
|
|
09/19/2008 03:41:54 AM · #72 |
relax
PRASH is going to explain it just now |
|
|
09/19/2008 03:52:26 AM · #73 |
Originally posted by cutout: relax
PRASH is going to explain it just now |
Uhhh.. may be not. Thats a proprietary format;-) I did to some extent in an earlier post. If you have a question, PM me once the voting is over.
And now I start to see clearly why people dont comment usually. Not many can take criticism well.
Message edited by author 2008-09-19 04:06:21.
|
|
|
09/19/2008 04:41:38 AM · #74 |
Originally posted by Prash:
And now I start to see clearly why people dont comment usually. Not many can take criticism well. |
I think for most people it's just trying to understand how the scale works - which you've now explained :- )
For me, there is a danger that the format you are using comes across as a little impersonal, which is perhaps why people tend to use words rather than numbers, and verbalise what they see as the strengths and weaknesses.
Personally the more I comment, the harder I find it to put pictures into specific criteria - not least because my views are also evolving and changing. The more exposed I get to all the different streams of pictures and genres here on DPC, the more open I am to trying to understand where the person is trying to go with their picture - rather than trying to fit it to my expectations.
But that might just be me :- )
|
|
|
09/19/2008 04:50:50 AM · #75 |
Originally posted by Prash: Originally posted by cutout: relax
PRASH is going to explain it just now |
Uhhh.. may be not. Thats a proprietary format;-) I did to some extent in an earlier post. If you have a question, PM me once the voting is over.
|
Oh, so I got a nice vote... thinking it was worse than a DNMC...
Am I wrong to assume not everybody follows the forums? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/29/2024 03:32:01 AM EDT.