Author | Thread |
|
08/17/2008 10:39:44 AM · #1 |
I have been looking at going dSLR, and I've looked at the 450d, a few Nikons, but I have also looked at the Olympis E510, it seems very good, and it's more than 100 pounds cheaper than the 450d, but the 4/3 thing confuses me, can any one shed some light on this please?
Also, any experiences of the camera would be nice too. |
|
|
08/17/2008 11:02:15 AM · #2 |
I love mine!! I have a 500 as a backup. It has been a really great camera for me.
|
|
|
08/17/2008 11:20:14 AM · #3 |
Hi Daniel, I'm really happy with it. For more information on the 4/3 system and a really objective review of the camera go to Wrotniak.net.
|
|
|
08/17/2008 07:34:03 PM · #4 |
So, compared to the 450d it's a good competitor? I was worried about the 3 vs 9 AF points compared to the Canon, and a few other things the reviews have mentioned. |
|
|
08/17/2008 08:11:51 PM · #5 |
There are alot of things to consider when chosing a system.
1. How does it feel in my hands.
2. Do I like the list of available lens that will
a. fit my budget
b. fit my style of shooting.
3. What type of printing do I do with the files. If you like 4x6 prints remember that Olympus doesnt shoot in 2:3 format and you would have to crop, meaning you would have to shoot loose enough to crop and not lose anything important.
4. Do I need low light, High ISO capability?
5. Do I really need a dSLR or will a high end P&S meet my needs.
Matt
|
|
|
08/17/2008 08:23:07 PM · #6 |
The E-510 is what I was considering until I ran across a Rebel at a steal of a deal. The 4/3 system sensor is almost as big as the APS-C size used in most other DSLR's. It is a standard developed and mostly used by Olympus and Panasonic at this time.
four-thirds.org
Wikipedia entry on the 4/3 system
Message edited by author 2008-08-17 20:58:10. |
|
|
08/17/2008 08:53:14 PM · #7 |
Have an E5 and an E3. Love them both. I've shot with Olympus for may years (off and on). I've always loved their lenses. Lens line a little shallow but Sigma makes some decent lenses for 4/3 bodies.
Message edited by author 2008-08-17 20:54:26. |
|
|
08/17/2008 08:58:05 PM · #8 |
I think I might go with the Olympus :D
This is interesting in the review.
There is a small article on Live MOS on Panasonic's Web site. Interestingly, Panasonic claims that the Live MOS offers the receptor ratio of 50%, as compared to 35% in CMOS sensors. While the concept is not defined in the article (after all, all Panasonic buyers know those things!), I understand it as the fraction of the total sensor area which is photosensitive. And then things become interesting: this means that, in spite of slightly (13%) smaller pixel pitch (distance between photosites), the Live MOS offers a photosite size larger than a CMOS sensor: by about 10% linear, or 20% in terms of the area. While I consider this insignificant, this is a recommended reading to those who claim that Four Thirds sensors cannot compete with APS-C ones because of "small pixels". |
|
|
08/18/2008 10:44:36 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by dd1989: So, compared to the 450d it's a good competitor? I was worried about the 3 vs 9 AF points compared to the Canon, and a few other things the reviews have mentioned. |
I seldom rely on the multiple focusing points, as I mostly do nature shooting I find it more reliable to enable only one AF point (normally the center one) to have faster control on what I want my focus on.
|
|
|
08/18/2008 02:07:24 PM · #10 |
Well. I bought the E510, arrives in a day or so :d |
|
|
08/20/2008 03:26:09 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by dd1989: Well. I bought the E510, arrives in a day or so :d |
Congratulations!! Looking forward for your pictures with it!
|
|
|
08/20/2008 06:26:08 PM · #12 |
yay it's here and I love it!
Do you shoot in RAW? I have a 2gb card so as long as I don't plan on taking lots at once, I'll shoot in RAW, otherwise jpg it is.
I shall wait untill it's light to have a real play around outdoors with it, indoor photography is silly. |
|
|
08/21/2008 01:22:11 AM · #13 |
Congratulations!!! You'll have a blast with it!!
I don't shoot in RAW because I have yet to learn how to edit the files, but I'm planning to!
A word of advice, make sure to check Wrotniak's Technical Review and Reference, as the camera works better with a couple of tweaks to the configuration.
Best regards and happy shooting!!!
|
|
|
08/21/2008 05:52:30 PM · #14 |
Ah yes, I noticed that from the previous link, however, one thing I notice...for example, when I set the noise to Low instead of Regular, it only saves that setting when the camera is on, seems to lose the settings after, or when the battery is charged... |
|
|
08/22/2008 08:54:44 AM · #15 |
Ignore me, it saves the settings fine :D |
|
|
08/22/2008 10:07:13 AM · #16 |
You have to save the settings for each mode you use (PASM), as each saves its own settings.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2023 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/28/2023 06:38:19 PM EST.