| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/08/2008 02:46:20 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by levyj413:
Ah, good points. Well, Scott, since you've captured all our running averages, maybe there could be a second award for biggest difference between our average right now and the average of our 2008 FS? That would be a separate award, equivalent to "Most Improved." |
That would be a lovely idea, something like the most improved player on the nba. I think this would be great.
Álex. |
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:13:01 PM · #27 |
testing my new, self-important signature...
|
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:21:11 PM · #28 |
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:24:09 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
loving sig... |
LOL! You'll have to start signing your posts with
<3 & Slippers (instead of Hugs & Kisses)!! |
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:28:49 PM · #30 |
Congrats on the winners. I intend to get higher than 13th this year. LOL!
|
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:35:50 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
testing my new, self-important signature... |
Man, that blue looks sooooo out of place. |
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:38:27 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by scarbrd:
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
testing my new, self-important signature... |
Man, that blue looks sooooo out of place. |
Sticks out like a sore thumb.
|
|
|
|
01/08/2008 03:44:25 PM · #33 |
|
|
|
01/08/2008 04:05:13 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by alexgarcia:
Originally posted by levyj413:
Ah, good points. Well, Scott, since you've captured all our running averages, maybe there could be a second award for biggest difference between our average right now and the average of our 2008 FS? That would be a separate award, equivalent to "Most Improved." |
That would be a lovely idea, something like the most improved player on the nba. I think this would be great.
Álex. |
If it uses our all time averages rather than a smaller more recent sample, which would be far more accurate, it won't reward the most improved. This is what happened in the old WPL when an already great (by DPC standards) Joey Lawrence won most improved even though all he did was perform at the same level he had been prior to the WPL but because of his low overall average 5.7 currently, he won it. Such a player can keep winning it every year without any improvement in this kind of format. Overall average is a very poor indicator of current ability and performance.
Message edited by author 2008-01-08 16:07:03.
|
|
|
|
01/08/2008 04:07:47 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by NikonJeb:
Isn't there some kind of muddy beige ribbon for the person who got the highest standing and never broke 6.0 for the entire run? LOL!!!
ETA: Thanks, Scott for your work and commitment to this project.
And oh yeah, congrats to you bastids that won!.....8>) |
Well done, Jeb! You managed to keep ahead of me and take the higher position.
Still, 2008 starts here, good luck! |
|
|
|
01/16/2008 12:45:53 AM · #36 |
Congrats to the superstars, new calc sounds interesting.
Lynne
finishing up 21st, beat out for 20th by Pedro who didn't even have to enter the last two months to do that. :-P |
|
|
|
01/16/2008 01:00:55 AM · #37 |
Congrates guys I think anybody who averages more 6 in free study is heck of a photographer.
(I am not sure if I am even close to these people).
Hats off. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 03:51:10 AM EDT.
