| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/21/2007 04:13:44 PM · #1 |
| Is the extra money worth the 2.8? |
|
|
|
09/21/2007 04:18:42 PM · #2 |
Depends really. I recently got the 2.8 without IS. It is an awesome lens. I had a Canon 70-300 IS lens and found that I had very little use for the IS and the lens didnt last long because they are plastic. You can't use the IS when mounted on a tripod or when panning, so felt there was no point as I shoot mainly horses.
I picked my 2.8 up at KEH.com for $999 second hand.
|
|
|
|
09/21/2007 04:23:25 PM · #3 |
I'm given to believe that the IS on the 70-200 lenses does not need to be switched off when the camera is mounted on a tripod, although it hardly adds anything to the picture quality in that instance, it has to be said and I further believe that the IS system will aid with panning in mode 2 setting.
|
|
|
|
09/21/2007 04:27:18 PM · #4 |
KEH f2.8 and f4
I have used these guys many many times and have never had a problem with them. Bought my 20D, my Metz ct60-4, other lenses and batteries etc,. You will see their prices are great.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 02:48:20 PM EDT.
