Backwards Masking - DPChallenge Forums

07/11/2007 10:05:11 AM · #26

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
No matter what you beleive, backwards masking is a science and has merit. If a band decides to use phrases that conjure up the devil is another matter. Those "church freaks" don't care if it is backwards or forward, they were against all lyrics that they deemed evil.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:
I remember watching the church freaks on TV demonstrating this with all kinds of records, claiming that Rock and Roll was the tool of the Devil and generally raising a fuss about nothing.

Hilarious!

I'll leave the debate about the "science" for later. I'm sure there's a technology for it and a theory, but neither one makes for scientific fact.

I just remember the hilarity of hearing from them how the armies of Satan were luring innocent Christians to the doom with rock and roll.

Message edited by author 2007-07-11 10:08:11.

07/11/2007 10:27:46 AM · #27

Originally posted by kenskid:

Notice I didn't say "scientific FACT". There is a science behind it but not researched and factualized.

On the other hand, Al Gore is screaming SCIENTIFIC FACT about man causing global warming and millions are buying it...even though other scientific studies say different.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
No matter what you beleive, backwards masking is a science and has merit. If a band decides to use phrases that conjure up the devil is another matter. Those "church freaks" don't care if it is backwards or forward, they were against all lyrics that they deemed evil.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:
I remember watching the church freaks on TV demonstrating this with all kinds of records, claiming that Rock and Roll was the tool of the Devil and generally raising a fuss about nothing.

Hilarious!

I'll leave the debate about the "science" for later. I'm sure there's a technology for it and a theory, but neither one makes for scientific fact.

I just remember the hilarity of hearing from them how the armies of Satan were luring innocent Christians to the doom with rock and roll.

07/11/2007 11:21:01 AM · #28

First off...by Red Herring, do you mean Al's theroy is red or MY take on it is a Red Herring?

On backwards masking "science"....I'll look up the vowel/phrase combos that when recorded forward "say" a certian thing and when reversed "say" another in the ENGLISH language. It may take me a while to find it b/c it is generally not part of the other crap associated with backward masking.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Ignoring your Al Gore red herring, there's also "science" behind just about any fringe belief; astrology, numerology, phrenology, tarot, voodoo.

I'll stick with facts and leave the pseudo-science to the gullible.

Originally posted by kenskid:
Notice I didn't say "scientific FACT". There is a science behind it but not researched and factualized.

On the other hand, Al Gore is screaming SCIENTIFIC FACT about man causing global warming and millions are buying it...even though other scientific studies say different.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
No matter what you beleive, backwards masking is a science and has merit. If a band decides to use phrases that conjure up the devil is another matter. Those "church freaks" don't care if it is backwards or forward, they were against all lyrics that they deemed evil.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:
I remember watching the church freaks on TV demonstrating this with all kinds of records, claiming that Rock and Roll was the tool of the Devil and generally raising a fuss about nothing.

Hilarious!

I'll leave the debate about the "science" for later. I'm sure there's a technology for it and a theory, but neither one makes for scientific fact.

I just remember the hilarity of hearing from them how the armies of Satan were luring innocent Christians to the doom with rock and roll.

07/11/2007 11:38:01 AM · #29

Originally posted by kenskid:

First off...by Red Herring, do you mean Al's theroy is red or MY take on it is a Red Herring?

I mean that bringing it up here is a red herring.

07/11/2007 11:44:30 AM · #30

Originally posted by kenskid:

On backwards masking "science"....I'll look up the vowel/phrase combos that when recorded forward "say" a certian thing and when reversed "say" another in the ENGLISH language. It may take me a while to find it b/c it is generally not part of the other crap associated with backward masking.

I don't doubt that certain sounds may sound like other sounds when played backwards, but that's just interesting trivia.

The planets may move about the heavens, but that doesn't prove that astrology is real.

07/11/2007 01:23:34 PM · #31

My god man...don't tell me you're on board with Gore saying man is causing global warming while DOUBTING the existance of backwards masking ! Please say it isn't so.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
First off...by Red Herring, do you mean Al's theroy is red or MY take on it is a Red Herring?

I mean that bringing it up here is a red herring.

07/11/2007 01:25:54 PM · #32

Originally posted by kenskid:

My god man...don't tell me you're on board with Gore saying man is causing global warming while DOUBTING the existance of backwards masking ! Please say it isn't so.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
First off...by Red Herring, do you mean Al's theroy is red or MY take on it is a Red Herring?

I mean that bringing it up here is a red herring.

No, but the two aren't related. Any discussion of Al Gore and global warming is largely irrelevant to the discussion of backwards masking.

07/11/2007 01:31:27 PM · #33

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
My god man...don't tell me you're on board with Gore saying man is causing global warming while DOUBTING the existance of backwards masking ! Please say it isn't so.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
First off...by Red Herring, do you mean Al's theroy is red or MY take on it is a Red Herring?

I mean that bringing it up here is a red herring.

No, but the two aren't related. Any discussion of Al Gore and global warming is largely irrelevant to the discussion of backwards masking.

07/11/2007 01:58:23 PM · #34

Originally posted by kenskid:

What ? I intoduced Gore in response to posts that say the masking doesn't exist or is hyped. I added Gore to show that many people believe in man=warming even though there is science to support and refute the theory...just like many refute backwards masking.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
My god man...don't tell me you're on board with Gore saying man is causing global warming while DOUBTING the existance of backwards masking ! Please say it isn't so.

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

Originally posted by kenskid:
First off...by Red Herring, do you mean Al's theroy is red or MY take on it is a Red Herring?

I mean that bringing it up here is a red herring.

No, but the two aren't related. Any discussion of Al Gore and global warming is largely irrelevant to the discussion of backwards masking.

Message edited by author 2007-07-11 13:59:08.