Author | Thread |
|
05/19/2007 12:57:00 PM · #126 |
I got one of the most amusing comments I've had, it was from who else but... posthumous! Thanks!! |
|
|
05/19/2007 02:27:31 PM · #127 |
aw shux, you guys have inspired me to flush all my meds... and that's what I'm going to tell the judge, too... |
|
|
05/19/2007 02:46:19 PM · #128 |
speaking about needing meds. My latest foot attire for a stress fracture. |
|
|
05/19/2007 02:49:41 PM · #129 |
Originally posted by quiet_observation: speaking about needing meds. My latest foot attire for a stress fracture. |
Mary...ouch! That looks painful. How long does it take for a stress fracture to heal? |
|
|
05/19/2007 02:49:51 PM · #130 |
Originally posted by formerlee: I got one of the most amusing comments I've had, it was from who else but... posthumous! Thanks!! |
Didn't get to my part of town yet - But o, photography! as no art is,
Faithful and disappointing! |
|
|
05/19/2007 02:57:18 PM · #131 |
I'll be booted for at least three weeks if I'm lucky; 6-8 weeks if I'm not.
and just for silliness.
Message edited by author 2007-05-19 15:25:05. |
|
|
05/19/2007 03:25:17 PM · #132 |
Originally posted by quiet_observation: I'll be booted for at least three weeks if I'm lucky; 6-8 weeks if I'm not. |
If it's any consolation, my sister wore one of those things for the better part of 3 years. So it'll be a cakewalk to only have to do 3-6 weeks! Go for the sympathy points... have people do stuff for you. And heal fast! |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:06:05 PM · #133 |
Originally posted by quiet_observation: speaking about needing meds. My latest foot attire for a stress fracture. |
See! You shouldn't be kicking me!
|
|
|
05/19/2007 04:07:23 PM · #134 |
Hi! Some updatey things. Was looking at where to buy the camera that Deb mentioned, and I saw on Amazon a comment that said that the lenses were very prone to having this error where it wouldn't retract. Did some more looking and there's actually a class action lawsuit against Cannon.
So! Checked out another camera for around the same price that was high on my list when I did the product advisor thing. Here is the Amazon.com link for it - it looks good, but it takes this battery. You can actually buy them together. So I am wondering - does this work just like a normal battery? Are they rechargable? I've never used one before (obviously) so I just don't know. Am I right in thinking levyj413 is coordinating this and I should PM him my address?
Mary, hope your foot gets better really soon!! And... that is seriously the weirdest picture. LOL. |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:08:47 PM · #135 |
The Chicago GTG was great! strangeghost and I caught the sunrise against the skyline, salmiakki joined us at breakfast, and MayaM and shaileshivyas found us at the Chicago Art Institute, and we toured the parks right there. It was a blast!
|
|
|
05/19/2007 04:10:42 PM · #136 |
Kelly, the battery is indeed rechargeable and they'll send one with the camera - you only need to buy one separately if you want to have two (which is indeed a very good idea!) |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:13:52 PM · #137 |
Originally posted by klstover: So! Checked out another camera for around the same price that was high on my list when I did the product advisor thing. Here is the Amazon.com link for it - it looks good, but it takes this battery. You can actually buy them together. So I am wondering - does this work just like a normal battery? Are they rechargable? I've never used one before (obviously) so I just don't know. Am I right in thinking levyj413 is coordinating this and I should PM him my address? |
Cameras are pretty picky about what kind of batteries you use; you're best off getting the one that's listed with it. On the plus side, that battery itself is rechargeable, so you won't need to stock up on them.
|
|
|
05/19/2007 04:13:53 PM · #138 |
Originally posted by klstover: Hi! Some updatey things. Was looking at where to buy the camera that Deb mentioned, and I saw on Amazon a comment that said that the lenses were very prone to having this error where it wouldn't retract. Did some more looking and there's actually a class action lawsuit against Cannon.
So! Checked out another camera for around the same price that was high on my list when I did the product advisor thing. Here is the Amazon.com link for it - it looks good, but it takes this battery. You can actually buy them together. So I am wondering - does this work just like a normal battery? Are they rechargable? I've never used one before (obviously) so I just don't know. Am I right in thinking levyj413 is coordinating this and I should PM him my address?
Mary, hope your foot gets better really soon!! And... that is seriously the weirdest picture. LOL. |
The camera is a good one, check out DPReview, they have full review of it. The battery is rechargeable, you charge it either with charger that comes with camera or in camera i.e. you connect power supply direct to camera. I would think it would be with a charger tho! Yep, I think levyj413 is sorting it out.
Gets a Highly Recommended (just about) from DPReview, but read their review before deciding.
Message edited by author 2007-05-19 16:17:15. |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:35:24 PM · #139 |
Doesn't Julianne have one like that?
Hey, Deb, look what your camera can do. |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:45:13 PM · #140 |
Holy freakin' cow, that's impressive! |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:49:17 PM · #141 |
Makes you want to run out a buy one of these? |
|
|
05/19/2007 04:50:43 PM · #142 |
Originally posted by quiet_observation: Makes you want to run out a buy one of these? |
Yeah! Hey, that won't fit on my camera :(( |
|
|
05/19/2007 05:03:34 PM · #143 |
|
|
05/19/2007 05:14:16 PM · #144 |
Ref: hywindpost.
I had the 9500 and it just didn't do the job. The 6900Z was one of the best. The zoom on the 9500 was not what I had hoped. The Macro on the 6900Z was great, see my Momma gonna keep you cosy pic, that was the quality of that camera.
The 9500/updated 9600 didn't match that by a mile.
Message edited by author 2007-05-19 17:14:48. |
|
|
05/19/2007 05:59:08 PM · #145 |
Originally posted by quiet_observation: Makes you want to run out a buy one of these? |
That's the lens all right. NB he says the shot was hand held from his boat. |
|
|
05/19/2007 06:23:33 PM · #146 |
Originally posted by formerlee: I got one of the most amusing comments I've had, it was from who else but... posthumous! Thanks!! |
So did I...cracked me up!!! |
|
|
05/19/2007 06:55:32 PM · #147 |
Originally posted by formerlee: Ref: hywindpost.
I had the 9500 and it just didn't do the job. The 6900Z was one of the best. The zoom on the 9500 was not what I had hoped. The Macro on the 6900Z was great, see my Momma gonna keep you cosy pic, that was the quality of that camera.
The 9500/updated 9600 didn't match that by a mile. |
IMO the 6900z falls well short ot the functions available on the 9600.
3.3megpixels 6900z 9.0megapixels 9600 + a 28-300 nondetachable lens. no dust spots on the censor, and image stableization. raw + jpeg shooting.
We all see cameras differently..
|
|
|
05/19/2007 06:55:58 PM · #148 |
Random question - do you think I'll get a load of dnmc marks if the desaturated part of my image still shows a bit of colour in selective desat? |
|
|
05/19/2007 08:10:19 PM · #149 |
Originally posted by purpleflutterby13: Random question - do you think I'll get a load of dnmc marks if the desaturated part of my image still shows a bit of colour in selective desat? |
Yes.
Because the challenge description states greyscale, and if there is colour, it's not greyscale.
|
|
|
05/19/2007 08:25:28 PM · #150 |
Originally posted by kashi: Originally posted by purpleflutterby13: Random question - do you think I'll get a load of dnmc marks if the desaturated part of my image still shows a bit of colour in selective desat? |
Yes.
Because the challenge description states greyscale, and if there is colour, it's not greyscale. |
Ok, thanks. The challenge description shall be obeyed. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 10:12:20 PM EDT.