| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/13/2007 10:24:11 PM · #1 |
| Way to go...to those captains finalizing the last few teams. Here we go...DPL1!! |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 10:12:38 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by citymars:
Thanks, Elvis -- I copied your card so I could get the size right. Is there more to the "template" then that? |
yea the psd file is set up so you can easily change the text, colors and image. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:57:45 PM · #3 |
Thanks, Elvis -- I copied your card so I could get the size right. Is there more to the "template" then that?
|
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:41:32 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by citymars:
Thanks for the clarification, folks. There's already a lot of stuff to read through!
*And* it looks like Zero Division already has it's sixth player! This is really great. I'm thrilled, and thrilled that the other teams can breathe easier, too.
EDIT: Jeez, now I gotta make player trading cards? ;-) |
email me if you would like my template. I can mail you the PSD file.
this is what it looks like
 |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:35:20 PM · #5 |
Thanks for the clarification, folks. There's already a lot of stuff to read through!
*And* it looks like Zero Division already has it's sixth player! This is really great. I'm thrilled, and thrilled that the other teams can breathe easier, too.
EDIT: Jeez, now I gotta make player trading cards? ;-)
Message edited by author 2007-05-13 21:35:51. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:30:49 PM · #6 |
72 teams! We are ready to go!
|
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:28:38 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by ssodell:
Originally posted by citymars:
So... we have five on our team and one "formal" invitation hanging (not to mention all the direct PM invitations I made).
Do I withdraw the invite to person #6, or send a formal invite to someone to make person #7?
Does this make sense? :-} |
I had the same thought, so I just sent another invite to a seventh person. From what I read in the rules, you can have no <5 <=6 <=7. Does that make sense? At least 5 and then 6 or 7. You can also change players once in the season or switch players after checking with the site council. I'm still not fully clear on it though. If the six and seven will be reserve players or what? |
6 and 7 will play the same as the rest. you just have the option in case you want a small team. in reality you are doing yourelf a big disservice if you only have 5. you can change one player, one time from what i understand. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:25:39 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by ssodell:
Originally posted by citymars:
So... we have five on our team and one "formal" invitation hanging (not to mention all the direct PM invitations I made).
Do I withdraw the invite to person #6, or send a formal invite to someone to make person #7?
Does this make sense? :-} |
I had the same thought, so I just sent another invite to a seventh person. From what I read in the rules, you can have no <5 <=6 <=7. Does that make sense? At least 5 and then 6 or 7. You can also change players once in the season or switch players after checking with the site council. I'm still not fully clear on it though. If the six and seven will be reserve players or what? |
They will not be reserve players. Their score will count each week just like the all photographers. If the 6 and 7 player (photographer) has one of the four highest team scores then their score will count.
Every member of a team has the same rights with the exception:
1. only a member can start a team
2. Members have the opportunity to enter two challenges per week that can count toward the teams score where a R-User can only enter one unless they upgrade to a member.
|
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:19:46 PM · #9 |
| So then all seven members have the same rights and privileges? Depending on whether they are DPChallenge members or registered users, I mean. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:11:07 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by citymars:
So... we have five on our team and one "formal" invitation hanging (not to mention all the direct PM invitations I made).
Do I withdraw the invite to person #6, or send a formal invite to someone to make person #7?
Does this make sense? :-} |
I had the same thought, so I just sent another invite to a seventh person. From what I read in the rules, you can have no <5 <=6 <=7. Does that make sense? At least 5 and then 6 or 7. You can also change players once in the season or switch players after checking with the site council. I'm still not fully clear on it though. If the six and seven will be reserve players or what? |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:09:52 PM · #11 |
Yeah. And perhap by default less submissions this last week - everyone takign a rest before the charge. Now what are those first challenges going to be.
Message edited by author 2007-05-13 21:10:10.
|
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:07:59 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by Firsty:
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
WOW triple last season. this should make for some pretty even divisions. |
it will also make for lots of entries, minimum 360-504 per challenge just from the DPL competitors if between 5-7 entries per team per challenge |
I think they will be bigger at first but remember that not all DPl players are members so they can't enter the member challenge and the two open challenges usually even things out. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:03:28 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
WOW triple last season. this should make for some pretty even divisions. |
it will also make for lots of entries, minimum 360-504 per challenge just from the DPL competitors if between 5-7 entries per team per challenge
|
|
|
|
05/13/2007 09:00:46 PM · #14 |
So... we have five on our team and one "formal" invitation hanging (not to mention all the direct PM invitations I made).
Do I withdraw the invite to person #6, or send a formal invite to someone to make person #7?
Does this make sense? :-}
Message edited by author 2007-05-13 21:03:06. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 08:53:28 PM · #15 |
WOW triple last season. this should make for some pretty even divisions.
Man there are some good photogs still in the free agent pool.
Message edited by author 2007-05-13 21:00:37. |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 08:48:28 PM · #16 |
oh my gosh!! 72 teams!!
Good luck to each and every team!!!!! |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 08:47:59 PM · #17 |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 08:46:34 PM · #18 |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 10:50:04 AM · #19 |
| wasn't there a team created called something like the 11th hour? Did they go away so they could come back in and get themselves finalized at the 11th hour and leave everyone hanging on the edge of their seats until then? |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 10:16:38 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by langdon:
...and 69 of those are finalized.
We just need three more teams finalized! Two teams are right on the verge of finalization, needing only 1 more team member to accept. The rest of the teams need any where from 2-4 team members to accept.
Go go go! |
In other words, 4 people total would do the trick. :) |
|
|
|
05/13/2007 10:12:31 AM · #21 |
...and 69 of those are finalized.
We just need three more teams finalized! Two teams are right on the verge of finalization, needing only 1 more team member to accept. The rest of the teams need any where from 2-4 team members to accept.
Go go go! |
|
|
|
05/12/2007 11:45:45 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by yanko:
That is not as much fun though. You need an opponent each week to despise. :P |
I despise Yanko, but only for the next 5 minutes, since it's the pre-season. I'm saving it up for the regular season.
|
|
|
|
05/12/2007 06:25:11 PM · #23 |
Originally posted by Wade:
Originally posted by langdon:
Originally posted by yanko:
So we are at 67 finalized teams. Do we need to get to 72 finalized teams to avoid turning some away? |
Affirmative. =/ |
No chance that the league format could be changed to a cumulative rotisserie style( I'm a fantasy football geek) scoring system?-instead of "Head to Head". This would allow all the teams to participate regardless of the number of teams. |
That is not as much fun though. You need an opponent each week to despise. :P |
|
|
|
05/12/2007 06:18:01 PM · #24 |
The Final(ized) Four...who will they be?
Count down to 72...? |
|
|
|
05/12/2007 10:00:17 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by langdon:
Originally posted by yanko:
So we are at 67 finalized teams. Do we need to get to 72 finalized teams to avoid turning some away? |
Affirmative. =/ |
No chance that the league format could be changed to a cumulative rotisserie style( I'm a fantasy football geek) scoring system?-instead of "Head to Head". This would allow all the teams to participate regardless of the number of teams.
Message edited by author 2007-05-12 10:00:49. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/20/2024 12:11:36 AM EDT.
