| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/06/2007 09:54:57 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by meyers:
Originally posted by sfalice:
Hmmm, I don't know why that first thumb didn't print. the number's right.
But then, you get the idea. |
When I try to go to that image (220909) directly, I get an error saying the image has been hidden by the photographer. Maybe it's in their Workshop? |
Thanks for the tip. It was in my Architecture folder, but somehow I accidentally hid it in there. It shows now. |
|
|
|
05/06/2007 10:38:42 AM · #27 |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 03:57:07 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by rinac:
Originally posted by bmartuch:
Where is this legal in DPC?
Is it legal in Basic or Advanced editing? |
Might be ok with the Advanced ruleset since it's only dealing with colour shifts, but I don't think it would be legal in Basic as you cannot use this function as an adjustment layer.
Can SC confirm one way or the other?
|
BUMP for the SC |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 04:29:00 PM · #29 |
Thanks for the idea...the only thing I could see the SC saying is that it would be using a second image, but I'm not sure if that's entirely true in true in this case or not.
Hmm... |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 04:34:24 PM · #30 |
This is awsome, thanks alot for this tip! btw, does anyone know where i could find some old paintings to look through? I have one to contribute if anyones interested.
 |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 04:35:40 PM · #31 |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 04:39:08 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by bdenny:
|
sorry, not sure how i missed that :P |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 04:47:50 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by kawana:
sorry, not sure how i missed that :P |
They're all Rennassaince (sp?) artists, I'm sure there's a better link to some other art periods. Pop Art, for example, would have crazy bright colors which could turn out pretty cool. |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 04:56:31 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by bdenny:
Originally posted by rinac:
Originally posted by bmartuch:
Where is this legal in DPC?
Is it legal in Basic or Advanced editing? |
Might be ok with the Advanced ruleset since it's only dealing with colour shifts, but I don't think it would be legal in Basic as you cannot use this function as an adjustment layer.
Can SC confirm one way or the other? |
BUMP for the SC |
Uh ... the informal opinion of 3 SC members is that this falls under the category of "color and tonal adjustments" and is therefore legal under both Basic and Advanced Rules. This is not a definitive ruling, however, since sometimes we have to see just how much an effect changes the original image before deciding if it's legal or not.
I think if your final image looks like your original except for color changes, you will probably be OK.
Personally, having seen  sfalice's example with color squares, I'm going to try and create something wacky ... though not for a challenge entry ... : ) |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 05:05:37 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Uh ... the informal opinion of 3 SC members is that this falls under the category of "color and tonal adjustments" and is therefore legal under both Basic and Advanced Rules. This is not a definitive ruling, however, since sometimes we have to see just how much an effect changes the original image before deciding if it's legal or not.
I think if your final image looks like your original except for color changes, you will probably be OK. |
Fair enough, thanks. I guess it's always wise to open a ticket when in doubt for a challenge entry anyway :) Cheers! |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 05:14:32 PM · #36 |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 05:24:59 PM · #37 |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 06:52:36 PM · #38 |
| Cool, I can't wait to try this:D |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 08:24:24 PM · #39 |
| OMG. I thought I knew alot about PhotoShop. Now I find this and HDR. I have a lot more learning to do. |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 09:27:50 PM · #40 |
very nice technique... could be quite useful for when I'm feeling lazy :D
Now what we need is a website with lots of different examples of pictures from various times/periods so we can plagiarise their colours :D |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 10:16:32 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by diablo2097:
very nice technique... could be quite useful for when I'm feeling lazy :D
Now what we need is a website with lots of different examples of pictures from various times/periods so we can plagiarise their colours :D |
psssttt look above you in the thread, they've posted a link already ;) |
|
|
|
05/11/2007 05:09:55 AM · #42 |
Originally posted by diablo2097:
very nice technique... could be quite useful for when I'm feeling lazy :D
Now what we need is a website with lots of different examples of pictures from various times/periods so we can plagiarise their colours :D |
//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings
Message edited by author 2007-05-11 05:10:07.
|
|
|
|
05/11/2007 07:47:19 AM · #43 |
lol oops... shoulda looked a bit harder before hitting the post button :P
thanks for the other link too bod |
|
|
|
05/11/2007 11:51:03 AM · #44 |
//www.artcylcopedia.com
This site has links to just about every artist ever imaginable. If you search an artist or a period, it gives you links to museums online galleries. |
|
|
|
05/12/2007 01:50:58 AM · #45 |
Something to play around with...
make a new image 256X256px and fill it with a B&W gradient then use that as your source image for match color. Add in more control points to your gradient and "mix up" the amounts of the in between colors and you get a very interesting way to convert an image to B&W with a lot of control over the contrast in the process. Or use it on a new layer as a luminance channel and it affects the richness of the colors in the image.
I'm just experimenting myself but I'm getting some pretty cool results. Match color is a really cool function :) |
|
|
|
05/22/2007 07:14:00 PM · #46 |
| So, you can't do this with PS 7.0? :( |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 11:45:46 AM EDT.
