| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/12/2003 01:21:26 PM · #1 |
I have uploaded to my portfolio 3 versions of a football photo. One is the full size original. The other two have been downsized using different programs. I can't tell much difference myself but am not sure if I should trust my eyes or my monitor. Can anyone detect any difference? Which looks best on your monitor?
 downsized to 93kb
 downsized to 409kb
 original
Your opinions please. |
|
|
|
11/12/2003 01:27:13 PM · #2 |
The original has the best definition and saturation.
The 409KB is next best.
[Apple 17" CRT flat screen] |
|
|
|
11/12/2003 06:47:13 PM · #3 |
| Thank you zeuszen, that's helpful. |
|
|
|
11/12/2003 06:52:43 PM · #4 |
I see a slight difference in the color. Like zeuszen said, the original's saturation is better. I really could only notice on the red helmet though. They all seem pretty much the same to me.
|
|
|
|
11/12/2003 07:02:11 PM · #5 |
| Exactlly what zeuzen said. I can quite easily tell the difference in the texture of the grass and the edge of the white markings, the original looks sharper. |
|
|
|
11/12/2003 07:05:44 PM · #6 |
downsized to 409kb shows best on my monitor.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2003 09:04:48 AM · #7 |
|
|
|
11/13/2003 09:30:32 AM · #8 |
I think the original one looks better than all 3 and if you choose one downsized the 2nd looked better, slight differents in the texture and clearness of the grass. Great shot!
Message edited by author 2003-11-13 09:32:03.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 07:43:34 AM EDT.
