DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Administrator Announcements >> Minimal Editing Discussion
Pages:   ...
Showing posts 26 - 50 of 410, (reverse)
AuthorThread
01/18/2007 10:31:30 PM · #26
Originally posted by Shakalaka:

Originally posted by chimericvisions:

And yet this stupid phrase is still in there...

"use any feature of your camera while photographing your entry."


OK, if you insist, I'll turn off my LCD :-)


The point is that even in "Minimal Editing" multiple exposures are going to be allowed. It's even more BS than in Basic and Advanced.
01/18/2007 10:34:54 PM · #27
Originally posted by chimericvisions:

And yet this stupid phrase is still in there...

"use any feature of your camera while photographing your entry."


Where's your birthday manners?

Bring on the challenge, those who wish to participate may do so! :o)

(Don't fail to notice the smiley... all in good humor here, aw'right?)
01/18/2007 10:37:46 PM · #28
Sounds cool to me, just like theStraight from the Camera Challenge.
01/18/2007 10:38:15 PM · #29
Let's give it a try!!

I don't want to bring this up but some people have the advantage of multiple exposures in-camera.
01/18/2007 10:39:57 PM · #30
Originally posted by chimericvisions:

And yet this stupid phrase is still in there...

"use any feature of your camera while photographing your entry."


Yeah, but realistically I think that phrase has to be there. Suppose that certain camera features were disallowed. If someone submits a photo, there's no way to prove that they used an illegal feature on their camera. Which means it has to be legal, because DPC doesn't rely on the honor system.

Message edited by author 2007-01-18 22:43:56.
01/18/2007 10:43:48 PM · #31
Originally posted by ivaldovi:

Let's give it a try!!

I don't want to bring this up but some people have the advantage of multiple exposures in-camera.

True, from my experience though I have never done one that didn't still need quite abit of work after being multi-exposed(I can't think of the right word), i.e. color correction or burning and dodging to even things up before I would consider entering it. I don't think it would do so well, but I could be wrong.
01/18/2007 10:45:38 PM · #32
This is still way too liberal a rule set. I advocate one that disallows the use of a camera (bury or burn the sensor, that sort of thing) -or better yet another set that prohibits publishing the entry altogether in a contest especially created for this. (should I or should I not follow up with a smiley?)

Message edited by author 2007-01-18 22:46:40.
01/18/2007 10:47:16 PM · #33
I don't know how multiple exposures work in a digital camera (my model doesn't have it) but I would think you could adjust the exposures as one would do when doing multiexposures on a film camera.

It's just something else that needs to be worked out like contrast, saturation and sharpness.

Or maybe you don't have that much control.
01/18/2007 10:48:41 PM · #34
Originally posted by chimericvisions:


The point is that even in "Minimal Editing" multiple exposures are going to be allowed. It's even more BS than in Basic and Advanced.


You CAN do multiple exposures with the 350D... just takes a little more work.
01/18/2007 10:48:53 PM · #35
Pure old school with a digital twist.

This definetly is the yin to the yang with the "Expert Editing" rule set.

Nice.
01/18/2007 10:49:16 PM · #36
Originally posted by ivaldovi:

Let's give it a try!!

I don't want to bring this up but some people have the advantage of multiple exposures in-camera.


and some cameras take shots in sepia, and some cameras let you crop in-camera, etc. etc. etc.

there's really no way to completely level the playing field. :/

Originally posted by zeuszen:


This is still way too liberal a rule set. I advocate one that disallows the use of a camera (bury or burn the sensor, that sort of thing) -or better yet another set that prohibits publishing the entry altogether in a contest especially created for this. (should I or should I not follow up with a smiley?)


in this case, i think the smiley is wholly unnecessary. :P
01/18/2007 10:50:22 PM · #37
Originally posted by cpanaioti:

I don't know how multiple exposures work in a digital camera (my model doesn't have it) but I would think you could adjust the exposures as one would do when doing multiexposures on a film camera.

It's just something else that needs to be worked out like contrast, saturation and sharpness.

Or maybe you don't have that much control.

You have alot of control, I just am not that good to get it right straight from the camera :).
01/18/2007 10:51:14 PM · #38
Originally posted by jdannels:

Originally posted by cpanaioti:

I don't know how multiple exposures work in a digital camera (my model doesn't have it) but I would think you could adjust the exposures as one would do when doing multiexposures on a film camera.

It's just something else that needs to be worked out like contrast, saturation and sharpness.

Or maybe you don't have that much control.

You have alot of control, I just am not that good to get it right straight from the camera :).


Something to work on? ;oP
01/18/2007 10:52:35 PM · #39
Originally posted by ivaldovi:

I don't want to bring this up but some people have the advantage of multiple exposures in-camera.


Just a personal opinion but, given the restrictive nature and intent of this rule set, I would imagine that someone using a fancy camera feature for the purpose of editing a shot (removing redeye or combining photos after the capture) might find themselves DQ'd under the spirit of the rules. That, or we might just have to put a disclaimer in there. Bottom line: I wouldn't try it! ;-)

Message edited by author 2007-01-18 22:53:57.
01/18/2007 10:53:35 PM · #40
Originally posted by zeuszen:

...should I or should I not follow up with a smiley?


Did you just think that to yourself, or did you actually type it out loud?

Message edited by author 2007-01-18 22:56:56.
01/18/2007 10:57:09 PM · #41
Delightful!! Thank you!
01/18/2007 10:57:14 PM · #42
Originally posted by Keith Maniac:

Originally posted by zeuszen:

...should I or should I not follow up with a smiley?


Did you just think that to yourself, or did you actually type it?


I think he has a computer that reads his mind. Scary. ;oP
01/18/2007 10:57:37 PM · #43
As I understand it no toning is allowed except via an in camera feature?

Message edited by author 2007-01-18 22:58:12.
01/18/2007 10:57:56 PM · #44
Originally posted by Techo:

Was wondering if it's ok to use the Channel Mixer to convert to greyscale? and as I understand it no toning is allowed except via an in camera feature?


no.
01/18/2007 10:58:39 PM · #45
Originally posted by minimal rules:


(You May) fully desaturate your image using your editing software's "desaturate," "convert to grayscale" or equivalent function. Customizable tools are not allowed.


no channel mixer, gradient map, hue/saturation.
01/18/2007 10:59:11 PM · #46
ooOOooOOoo ... s e p i a ...
01/18/2007 10:59:27 PM · #47
Originally posted by Techo:

As I understand it no toning is allowed except via an in camera feature?


you can convert to grayscale using the methods in the ruleset. or, if your camera does toning in camera, you may use that.
01/18/2007 10:59:52 PM · #48
Originally posted by muckpond:

Originally posted by Techo:

Was wondering if it's ok to use the Channel Mixer to convert to greyscale? and as I understand it no toning is allowed except via an in camera feature?


no.


You're fast! :)

Thanks, I re-read that part about the channel mixer. So that's no to the "in camera toning" part as well?
01/18/2007 11:00:24 PM · #49
i'm super-fast! i beat you again! :P
01/18/2007 11:00:32 PM · #50
So happy I've been brushing up on my in-camera features lately! :)
Pages:   ...
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 09:35:42 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 09:35:42 AM EDT.