Author | Thread |
|
10/23/2003 03:30:55 PM · #1 |
Who says birds don't have lips? You can clearly see here that they do!
|
|
|
10/23/2003 03:33:17 PM · #2 |
Nice!
What did you use to get that shot a Canon 300mm or 400mm IS lens :) ?
Real nice.
Calvus
|
|
|
10/23/2003 03:39:00 PM · #3 |
75-300 IS :) ..
I like the black and white version except that I can't see his lips that well.
Anyone able to do a b&w conversion that would show the lips better?
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:00:24 PM · #4 |
no channel mixer gurus wanna give it a shot? :-))
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:09:41 PM · #5 |
I'm no channel mixer guru but here is my attempt.
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:12:32 PM · #6 |
|
|
10/23/2003 06:13:18 PM · #7 |
|
|
10/23/2003 06:16:29 PM · #8 |
Who's lips are those Angelina Jolie, or Mick Jagger? That image made my day. Great job Konador.
Message edited by author 2003-10-23 18:16:51.
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:26:37 PM · #9 |
That is hilarious!
Nice work. Two Atta Boys.
Calvus
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:30:31 PM · #10 |
Still love this classic bird short.
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:49:39 PM · #11 |
my poor little tiny baby birdy.
MUTATED!
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:51:16 PM · #12 |
Well at least now it can explore different styles of music instead of boring old whistling. You'd better re-enforce your windows before it starts singing Pavarotti!
Message edited by author 2003-10-23 18:51:43.
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:53:33 PM · #13 |
judging from the positive reaction to ben's edit, we should completely open EDITING :-))
|
|
|
10/23/2003 06:55:33 PM · #14 |
Yay, mutated animals galore!
|
|
|
10/23/2003 07:03:27 PM · #15 |
Anyone ever do a "Blinky" from the Simpsons? The 3 eyed fish. Konador?
|
|
|
10/23/2003 07:36:10 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999: no channel mixer gurus wanna give it a shot? :-)) |
I am no guru but I have been playing around with the channels lately so here is my attempt. Not fantastic but it's the best I can do :)
//www.tomlewis.btinternet.co.uk/untitled.jpg |
|
|
10/23/2003 07:39:18 PM · #17 |
wow tomlewis! that is vastly improved over mine. what settings did you use?
Originally posted by tomlewis1980:
Originally posted by magnetic9999: no channel mixer gurus wanna give it a shot? :-)) |
I am no guru but I have been playing around with the channels lately so here is my attempt. Not fantastic but it's the best I can do :)
//www.tomlewis.btinternet.co.uk/untitled.jpg |
|
|
|
10/23/2003 07:50:38 PM · #18 |
I normally use the green channel when B&W a photo, as in most digital cameras the green has the least noise. Unfortunately there wasn't much contrast on the green channel, so I ran the image through a demo of neat image ( //www.neatimage.com/ ). Opened in PS, then in the channel mixer I set the red channel to approx. 120%, green to 0% and blue to approx. -20%. Then auto contrast and slight sharpening. |
|
|
10/23/2003 08:35:59 PM · #19 |
cool.
one thing i dont understand is why you ran it thru neatimage? was there too much noise in the red channel without it?
|
|
|
10/23/2003 09:49:09 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999: cool.
one thing i dont understand is why you ran it thru neatimage? was there too much noise in the red channel without it? |
Same editing but without neatimage. Makes quite a difference :) I think this is because the red and blue are the noisiest channels and setting one to negative and one to positive in the channel mixer increases the contrast between them. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/28/2024 03:25:12 PM EDT.