| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/07/2006 09:36:24 PM · #176 |
Originally posted by cuspie:
My husband said, "Take a picture, it lasts longer"
*cackle* |
Just to be the devil's advocate here... what do you think your husband would have said or done had the person done just that... take I photograph I mean.
I am not passing judgement... just being curious.
Ray |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 09:45:44 PM · #177 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Just to be the devil's advocate here... what do you think your husband would have said or done had the person done just that... take I photograph I mean. |
Can we report that photographer? I remember reading about a guy who went to public places and took photos of ladies in a revealing manner and got charged and his photos confisticated. The news was from the US. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 09:51:00 PM · #178 |
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Just to be the devil's advocate here... what do you think your husband would have said or done had the person done just that... take I photograph I mean. |
Can we report that photographer? I remember reading about a guy who went to public places and took photos of ladies in a revealing manner and got charged and his photos confisticated. The news was from the US. |
You may be referring to a case in the State of Washington... and the results can be viewed here |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:03:43 PM · #179 |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:04:48 PM · #180 |
To keep this thread on topic, can someone please post more boobies?
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:08:31 PM · #181 |
Sorry but you'll have to use your imagination here....
 - 
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:08:38 PM · #182 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
To keep this thread on topic, can someone please post more boobies? |
Ask and you shall receive...Boobies |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:09:22 PM · #183 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
You may be referring to a case in the State of Washington... and the results can be viewed here |
a very quick digression - surely under someone's skirt is considered a private place, no matter how public the place in which the person stands.
baring breasts in an exhibitionist manner (as in street parades, etc. etc.) would be considered public, but baring them in a utilitarian manner is not as public. not necessarily private, but in a sor tof privacey limbo. the kind where decency would be to respect the person's privacy...
tired, and a bit ranty.
say goodnight,gracie...
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:12:01 PM · #184 |
Originally posted by dwterry:
Sorry but you'll have to use your imagination here....
... |
so thin, yet so globular. o dear, makes me a little sad.
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:13:52 PM · #185 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Originally posted by crayon:
Can we report that photographer? I remember reading about a guy who went to public places and took photos of ladies in a revealing manner and got charged and his photos confisticated. The news was from the US. |
You may be referring to a case in the State of Washington... and the results can be viewed here |
So... the US law is that a voyeur can photograph upskirt as long as he does it in public places? amazing |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:15:03 PM · #186 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
To keep this thread on topic, can someone please post more boobies? |
Ask and you shall receive...Boobies |
I should've known that was gonna happen... d'oh!
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:47:49 PM · #187 |
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Originally posted by crayon:
Can we report that photographer? I remember reading about a guy who went to public places and took photos of ladies in a revealing manner and got charged and his photos confisticated. The news was from the US. |
You may be referring to a case in the State of Washington... and the results can be viewed here |
So... the US law is that a voyeur can photograph upskirt as long as he does it in public places? amazing |
As far as I know, this is currently the case in the State of Washington, but nowhere else... and one must also remember that laws can and do go get reviewed and amended.
Ray
Message edited by author 2006-08-07 22:56:33. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:51:08 PM · #188 |
| No! It is a beautiful image. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:05:10 PM · #189 |
| I think it is a great shot...maybe a little too much boob for some...but i don't think there is anything wrong with it...its just life.... |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:41:59 PM · #190 |
| I find nothing about the shot offensive, and I consider it a great photo. I personally don't consider the natural body offensive. I think it is a sad statement about American society when this could even be considered an issue. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:49:58 PM · #191 |
this photo makes me want to move to england where people are normal and dont find natural things offensive
|
|
|
|
08/08/2006 12:55:13 PM · #192 |
Most people wouldn't know whats really offensive until it came up to them and peed on their rosary beads.
Only Similac corporation finds this offensive. |
|
|
|
08/08/2006 03:53:30 PM · #193 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Originally posted by cuspie:
My husband said, "Take a picture, it lasts longer"
*cackle* |
Just to be the devil's advocate here... what do you think your husband would have said or done had the person done just that... take I photograph I mean.
I am not passing judgement... just being curious.
Ray |
Interesting...what WOULD he do if the guy took him literally?
Knowing my husband he would have punched him.
After we left the building I told him not to do that ever again. I breast feed in public and it WILL get attention...good AND bad.
He will have to deal with it. Not quite sure what goes on inside his head but it boils down to people ogling his wife (even though she's got it out in the open for anyone to see)
Strange, I know. |
|
|
|
08/08/2006 03:54:49 PM · #194 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
To keep this thread on topic, can someone please post more boobies? |
LOL, that wasn't the topic!
HAHAHA |
|
|
|
08/18/2006 06:02:01 PM · #195 |
Originally posted by blindjustice:
Most people wouldn't know whats really offensive until it came up to them and peed on their rosary beads.
Only Similac corporation finds this offensive. |
hilarious!! ~and true! |
|
|
|
08/18/2006 11:35:07 PM · #196 |
| I saw a rack with like 30 of those magazines at Burlington Coat factory in Albuquerque this week. I wonder what the people who complain about that one, think about the covers of Maxim or Stuff or that type of 'mens' magazine. |
|
|
|
08/18/2006 11:53:47 PM · #197 |
the name of the magizine is "baby talk" what else could they have taken a
picture of a dirty diaper or the baby sleeping seems to me they went with
something that would raise eyebrows and get them some free publicity....but all and all good shot |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 05:11:09 AM EDT.
