DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> Any believers out there?
Pages:  
Showing posts 76 - 100 of 224, (reverse)
AuthorThread
02/27/2006 02:26:52 PM · #76
I would love to see her pics and what she has, Calamity.

My real orb shot is on the "Orbs" thread, if you want to see it. It really distinquishes the difference between dust and real orbs.

And Jaywalk is most likely right. If you take any photo that is dark, well, lets just say these due to the orbs, and lighten in to the extreme, you can see orbs in them.

I did a reading for someone once who sent me a really DARK photo. I mean, it looked black. I lightened it extremely in PSP and was able to then read it and was spot on in that instance. So you can see them if you lighten them Calam.

Rose
02/27/2006 02:27:44 PM · #77
Just a quick shot at picking out the "orbs" in your "non-orb" shot.

These were the ones that were clearly visible to me on my laptop without any adjustments at all:


My laptop computer shows every little imperfection in a picture so I could see these without lightening anything... just striaght from the post in DPC.

ps. I saved the picture in "Paint" so the quality in not the best, but you should be able to see them in your original.

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 14:29:45.
02/27/2006 02:31:31 PM · #78
lol, thanks. Though my fiance would love to believe they were just dust... I really think differently. I have been taking photos for years and I have been in dusty places taking pics and I never have seen this before. Especially so hit and miss. If it were that much dust in the air or on my lens and/or water spots on my lens it would be in almost all my pictures.... the orbs were only in a handful.

I will get together with my sister and see when I can get her pics up. :)
02/27/2006 02:32:40 PM · #79
Not to be argumentative, but there are always airborne particles, many of which are not visible to the naked eye unless they are illuminated. If you sit in a darkened room and allow a single ray of sunlight to penetrate, you will be amazed at the fibers and dust floating in the air.
02/27/2006 02:43:14 PM · #80
Originally posted by CalamitysMaster00:

lol, thanks. Though my fiance would love to believe they were just dust... I really think differently. I have been taking photos for years and I have been in dusty places taking pics and I never have seen this before. Especially so hit and miss. If it were that much dust in the air or on my lens and/or water spots on my lens it would be in almost all my pictures.... the orbs were only in a handful.

I will get together with my sister and see when I can get her pics up. :)


Calam, believe me, this happens all the time. Now here is your photo in three different scenarios. This is the one you said showed no orbs. I bet if you did this to them all, you would see them.

The first one I lightened extreme..You can see the dust orbs.



Ok, this one is embossed. You can see no solidity to any of the orbs.



This one is a negative. Same thing. Nothing solid.



I hope you don't mind I played with these a bit in PSP.

Now if you go to the Orbs thread, and see my pics, you will see the differences in these orbs and the real orb photos.

Rose

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 14:43:53.
02/27/2006 02:56:51 PM · #81
This is for Rose8699........
I am wondering what your opinion would be on some of my photos. I've quite a few, I'm sure some are probably dust, but there are others that definately are not. In my portfolio, I have a couple posted - as well as 2 photos of what appears to be a mans face. When I turned them negative, you could still see them.
The one home is over 300 years old & the man who built it was said to posses the "sight".
I have some more here //sellershall.org/just click on the link for photos.
02/27/2006 03:04:12 PM · #82
Originally posted by Drummie:

This is for Rose8699........
I am wondering what your opinion would be on some of my photos. I've quite a few, I'm sure some are probably dust, but there are others that definately are not. In my portfolio, I have a couple posted - as well as 2 photos of what appears to be a mans face. When I turned them negative, you could still see them.
The one home is over 300 years old & the man who built it was said to posses the "sight".
I have some more here //sellershall.org/just click on the link for photos.


I'll go take a look. Hold on...

Ok, in the 30894 photo, the orb at the very top looks as if it was close to full manifestation. Unfortunately it wasn't caught at full. It is what I believe to be real, but only at 3/4 stage so it seems.

The first name that came to my mind was that of Samuel. Problem is, once I went to your link, it showed the name. Anyone could now say I was full of crap cause the name is on the site..LOL.so I have to throw that out.

In the 1800's photos, the ones of the fireplace emit a young woman to me in pantaloons. Not sure how you spell pantaloons, but you get the idea. I am not getting a clear name. I am getting an Alice, but I don't believe that is hers. There seems to be a LOT going on there and when there is, it can get confusing as to who is coming through verses what I see.

I know they were all NOT happy with the renovation. Especially in one photo where the ceiling seems to be drooping, I get a feeling of a really unhappy man.

Sometimes they are happy about restorations, ONCE completed. Sometimes not, depending on the feelings of the place in their time. In other words, if some old soul spent his life making it a pleasing Inn, and someone restores it to a pig farm, he may not like that. But if it is restored as an Inn and as he intended, he is happier for it. Many also believe that the past energies can and are absorbed by the walls, wood, solids of the venue, and they replay out a past happening or event. They may even come in visitation, or just don't want to leave at all. I wish I could explain it better, but not having been there yet..LOL..I can't. In any case, there are many facets to the photos, and many souls. I can sense them, but only see the pantaloon girl and sense the man. The man I will assume is Samuel, since it was the first name I got. The girl, I just can't place a name. She is not related to Samuel though, and seems from another time, maybe some years back.

Thats it for now, and wish I could help more. It helps me more and you more (validity wise), if the links don't have names or places. This way I can't be persuaded in the reading.

Right now I have a lot going on at my house, so it is hard to read anything. My best times are in the night and when quiet, so if I can I will try to read them again at that time.

Rose

Rose

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 15:21:55.
02/27/2006 03:35:29 PM · #83
Thanks Rose. I do have other photos, that I will get together. Perhaps in files for each seperate location, but with no details on them. Then I'll send you a link.
I believe you that the name Samuel popped up, even before you saw it written. That home in particular has ALOT of feeling to it. I am drawn to it, & I sense a strong sad feeling myself, but can't quite put my finger on why. I think you have hit that point - alot is likely what has been done with the home. Also, alot of death & birth there over the years.
Thank you so much for looking, it's nice to have a 2nd opinion (aside from my own :)).

Aslo wanted to add that the photo you mentioned, 30894, was taken at a different house. When I first took the photo, I swore there was what seemed to have been a misty apparition(not to say I "saw" it, maybe felt it- hard to explain), but only showed the orbs in the photo.

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 15:58:43.
02/27/2006 03:41:18 PM · #84
Originally posted by Drummie:

Thanks Rose. I do have other photos, that I will get together. Perhaps in files for each seperate location, but with no details on them. Then I'll send you a link.
I believe you that the name Samuel popped up, even before you saw it written. That home in particular has ALOT of feeling to it. I am drawn to it, & I sense a strong sad feeling myself, but can't quite put my finger on why. I think you have hit that point - alot is likely what has been done with the home. Also, alot of death & birth there over the years.
Thank you so much for looking, it's nice to have a 2nd opinion (aside from my own :)).


Ok, cool. I am signing off for a bit, but will be back on later. If you want, you can send them to my email as well, but I will check the thread too. Glad I was of some help though :)

Rose
02/27/2006 04:21:02 PM · #85
Just in case anyone is interested. Here is an old article about ghost, 1 year later, I appeared on "Good Morning Texas" Ch. 8 ABC in Dallas talking about the same things...with orb and mist photographs and the difference with each, and what the effects of dust, etc., are to photographs...getting as involved as speaking about electromagnetic fields, etc. Anyway...just something that might be interesting to some. The lady mentioned in the article and in the photo with me, is a great writer..think she has about 17 or 18 books published to date. She lives just down the street from me in Terrell, Texas.

article

Billy York

p.s. ROSE: I sent you a pm earlier..just haven't heard back.

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 16:43:52.
02/27/2006 04:27:34 PM · #86
I took this picture and posted in this thread but ended up deleting it off my computer. I think I have it on CD. I went back a searched the treads and here is a view. No one has been able to explain it as of yet. What do you think?


02/27/2006 04:29:18 PM · #87
Originally posted by southern_exposure:

I took this picture and posted in this thread but ended up deleting it off my computer. I think I have it on CD. I went back a searched the treads and here is a view. No one has been able to explain it as of yet. What do you think?


Now thats creepy!
02/27/2006 04:53:13 PM · #88
those are not 'orbs' it is dust and moisture in the air being illuminated by the flash. try this same photo in a light snow or drizzle and you will see the exact same thing intensified. its just stuff in the air.
02/27/2006 05:39:39 PM · #89
I still don't understand why people think that regular cameras are able to see things that can't be seen with the human eye. They are designed to record normal light, just like our eyes. They don't have some magic portal into an unseen dimension. That would cost extra.
02/27/2006 05:52:54 PM · #90
Originally posted by PhilipDyer:

I still don't understand why people think that regular cameras are able to see things that can't be seen with the human eye. They are designed to record normal light, just like our eyes. They don't have some magic portal into an unseen dimension. That would cost extra.


Hmmm... digital cameras do see things we can't see with the human eye. I can't see infrared with the human eye, but my camera can. You lost me on that statement. Sorry.........
02/27/2006 05:55:51 PM · #91
Originally posted by PhilipDyer:

I still don't understand why people think that regular cameras are able to see things that can't be seen with the human eye. They are designed to record normal light, just like our eyes. They don't have some magic portal into an unseen dimension. That would cost extra.


Do your eyes see infrared light?

Oops, Billy. You beat me to it!

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 17:56:24.
02/27/2006 05:59:48 PM · #92
Originally posted by Truegsht:

Just in case anyone is interested. Here is an old article about ghost, 1 year later, I appeared on "Good Morning Texas" Ch. 8 ABC in Dallas talking about the same things...with orb and mist photographs and the difference with each, and what the effects of dust, etc., are to photographs...getting as involved as speaking about electromagnetic fields, etc. Anyway...just something that might be interesting to some. The lady mentioned in the article and in the photo with me, is a great writer..think she has about 17 or 18 books published to date. She lives just down the street from me in Terrell, Texas.

article

Billy York

p.s. ROSE: I sent you a pm earlier..just haven't heard back.


I read the article. Very nice! I also cannot respond to PM's in my email. I always have trouble. You have to write directly to my email and not use PM. I tried to respond, but it didn't work.

Rose
02/27/2006 05:59:59 PM · #93
Originally posted by PhilipDyer:

I still don't understand why people think that regular cameras are able to see things that can't be seen with the human eye. They are designed to record normal light, just like our eyes. They don't have some magic portal into an unseen dimension. That would cost extra.


A human can stand outside at night for 30 sec and after there eyes have adjusted and still see the same. But put digital camera on 30 sec and see a world that would not be available to the human eye. If you don't believe me take your camera outside on an almost dark night and shoot a 1600 or 3200 ISO test shot and see how much is seen with your camera that you could not see with your eyes.
02/27/2006 06:01:43 PM · #94


now I see it.

But seriously; some people believe in ghosts but not evolution?
02/27/2006 06:05:28 PM · #95
There is a very old saying once said by a Preist in regards to the apparitions that occured in Lourdes of the Blessed Virgin. However, it applies in this discussion as well. It goes something like this...

To those that believe, there is no evidence necessary. To those that do not believe, there is no evidence possible.

In the end, what this means is that short of being slapped in the face by a ghost/spirit/energy, LOL...one who is a skeptic will remain so, and even THEN will try to find some scientific psychological explanation such as being insane.

There are just a lot of things that occur in this world that we cannot explain with science. Those that care to just shrug it off as a science undiscovered yet are certainly welcome to those thoughts. Those of us that have experienced what we have and know we are not insane need no scientific evidence.

Rose
02/27/2006 06:11:27 PM · #96
Originally posted by blindjustice:



now I see it.

But seriously; some people believe in ghosts but not evolution?

I'm not saying I'm believing in see or catching ghost on camera. This is the only shot I have ever taken that appears to have a ghostly form. For me it is unexplained.

Who knows it could be shadows playing tricks on the eye. I guess a 100 people could come up with 100 conclusions. But the fact is there there is something there either tangible on non-tangible.

EDIT to add: I do believe in ghostly apparitions and phenomenon's from personal experience. But I have no explanation. One time which me and another grown man saw the same thing at the same time. I guess you just have to have an open mind with fact's are not present.

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 18:24:33.
02/27/2006 06:12:18 PM · #97
Originally posted by Rose8699:

There is a very old saying once said by a Preist in regards to the apparitions that occured in Lourdes of the Blessed Virgin. However, it applies in this discussion as well. It goes something like this...

To those that believe, there is no evidence necessary. To those that do not believe, there is no evidence possible.

In the end, what this means is that short of being slapped in the face by a ghost/spirit/energy, LOL...one who is a skeptic will remain so, and even THEN will try to find some scientific psychological explanation such as being insane.

There are just a lot of things that occur in this world that we cannot explain with science. Those that care to just shrug it off as a science undiscovered yet are certainly welcome to those thoughts. Those of us that have experienced what we have and know we are not insane need no scientific evidence.

Rose


How true. My husband used to be one of those non-believers until he saw the TV move by itself. All it takes is one hair-raising experience to change your perspective.
02/27/2006 06:27:41 PM · #98
Originally posted by southern_exposure:

I took this picture and posted in this thread but ended up deleting it off my computer. I think I have it on CD. I went back a searched the treads and here is a view. No one has been able to explain it as of yet. What do you think?


This is paranormal. I can't quite get a reading from it. I know it is masculine, but seems odd at the same time. I am actually getting two male figures, but can't quite tap into more than it is paranormal and masculine. I will have to play with this one later on when I am up to it. Caught another darn head cold this week, and I am off to get some medicine. But I am quite certain this IS a paranormal shot and a good one!

EDITED TO ADD: Oh, OK, I just took a second look. This is a young man. About 30'ish. He is in a period of clothing that I don't know the era of. I will have to search it online. Puffed sleeves, long coat, buttoned front, high collar. I can see it in my mind, but I can't describe it. I will see if I can find a similarity. He was of high ranking in some time of pre war or emminant war. I'm not a big history buff, but I can see soldiers serving under him in my impression. First name that comes to mind is Michael, but that is a bit too common. I may be able to tap into more later on a name, but that is why it is odd to me. The clothing. It is SO costumish it just doesn't look real. But I guess it is! LOL..I will have to find it online. He has blonde hair, long to the base of the neck and cut at the neckline and he has bangs all across the forehead and cut in the same manner as the neck. Not unlike the cartoon type pictures of Prince Charming type hair and features, but only in real life and not cartoonish. Quite interesting. Something new for me this one is. LOL...He died early. Wasn't murder, but was sudden. He is just in visitation. He has trouble grasping he is gone and likes to look back around to where his resting place ended for his body and rethink the situation. But he isn't around all that often so good catch. I'll be back. Still have a store run to do. Good capture though!

Rose
Rose

Message edited by author 2006-02-27 18:35:37.
02/27/2006 06:41:35 PM · #99
I can't believe how many people think this crock of fecal matter is real....................
02/27/2006 06:50:56 PM · #100
Originally posted by Spazmo99:

I can't believe how many people think this crock of fecal matter is real....................

I don't know what it is or what it's not but what does it appear to be to you? I think I took this shot with my Panasonic FZ-20 with no filter. Looks like shadows but I don't know.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 03/28/2024 10:38:13 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/28/2024 10:38:13 AM EDT.