Author | Thread |
|
01/12/2006 03:43:17 PM · #126 |
yeah, im gonna have to agree with Alienyst on this one, it seems like alot of people dont know the meaning of backlighting..... |
|
|
01/12/2006 03:43:26 PM · #127 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: I always enjoy the baghead comment "nice photo" which goes along roughly (somewhere in the last few # of votes) with a drop from 5.83 to 5.70... |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Always watch the vote count, which I am sure you do. Sometimes you get two vote one with comment and one without. Also to consider are those with a low voting average. These folks give a 5 to a "nice photo" lol
The low voters hurt the most when you have a score of 7 and they splash you with a six. They don't realize that their generous gift has just lowered your score. lol |
|
|
01/12/2006 03:46:01 PM · #128 |
Not to complain (much), but today I have gone from 6.548 to 6.381. This includes among others 4 twos and 3 tens. Now either people with poorly calibrated monitors are thinking they see silhouette or they're intentionally knocking a good picture. Atleast that's my take on it.
|
|
|
01/12/2006 03:51:59 PM · #129 |
Originally posted by idnic: Not to complain (much), but today I have gone from 6.548 to 6.381. This includes among others 4 twos and 3 tens. Now either people with poorly calibrated monitors are thinking they see silhouette or they're intentionally knocking a good picture. Atleast that's my take on it. |
Hey you have no need to worry about people knocking your pic you are already a great photographer and you know it:))
mine is at 5.2889 |
|
|
01/12/2006 03:52:06 PM · #130 |
Holy CRAP! What the hell happened???? My score just took a dive... a major one! |
|
|
01/12/2006 03:53:15 PM · #131 |
Originally posted by polkop: Hey you have no need to worry about people knocking your pic you are already a great photographer and you know it:))
mine is at 5.2889 |
What a sweet thing to say, thank you.
Rikki, I feel ya pain man.
|
|
|
01/12/2006 03:55:13 PM · #132 |
Thanks Dan, I can often see each vote, but life gets in the way (ie. work) and I miss a few here and there. It always seems to be in those 3-5 vote blocks that I'll get a comment like this but a massive drop in my score. It certainly doesn't mean this person did it, and I don't even know if at 140 votes one vote could drop you 0.13, but it sticks in your craw nonetheless. |
|
|
01/12/2006 03:56:57 PM · #133 |
first 40 votes 5.125
next 40 votes 5.820
next 40 votes 6.075
last 22 votes 5.909
Votes: 142
Views: 182
Avg Vote: 5.7183
Comments: 5
kinda weird? or is this kinda normal? |
|
|
01/12/2006 03:57:20 PM · #134 |
Originally posted by Rikki: Holy CRAP! What the hell happened???? My score just took a dive... a major one! |
As you can see, I took a huge hit as well. (5.83-5.69) But I calculated it's too big for one vote.
|
|
|
01/12/2006 03:57:39 PM · #135 |
Originally posted by Alienyst: changed my mind...busted post |
Ha! I was just going to quote the challenge description ;) |
|
|
01/12/2006 04:04:20 PM · #136 |
Originally posted by idnic: Originally posted by polkop: Hey you have no need to worry about people knocking your pic you are already a great photographer and you know it:))
mine is at 5.2889 |
What a sweet thing to say, thank you.
Rikki, I feel ya pain man. |
Just when I thought I was dancing with you Cindi :( |
|
|
01/12/2006 04:05:55 PM · #137 |
We can still dance, Rikki, we're just dancing on the balcony instead of the stage. lol
|
|
|
01/12/2006 04:06:44 PM · #138 |
Originally posted by idnic: We can still dance, Rikki, we're just dancing on the balcony instead of the stage. lol |
Let's just watch it 'cause Achoo is sneaky and might push us over the edge. |
|
|
01/12/2006 04:08:35 PM · #139 |
Originally posted by shanksware: first 40 votes 5.125
next 40 votes 5.820
next 40 votes 6.075
last 22 votes 5.909
Votes: 142
Views: 182
Avg Vote: 5.7183
Comments: 5
What are you saying here? Are you saying that was your score at 40, 80, and 120 votes? or are you saying that was your average for that block of votes. Either way it doesn't make sense and I wonder if this isn't a server error rather than trolls. You seem to say that you have both a 5.9 and a 5.7 at 142 votes. Although changing votes is a possible answer, I don't think it's very likely...
kinda weird? or is this kinda normal? |
|
|
|
01/12/2006 04:14:27 PM · #140 |
Happy ;-)
Votes: 140
Views: 200
Avg Vote: 6.x929
Comments: 12
Favorites: 3
|
|
|
01/12/2006 04:14:31 PM · #141 |
I wrote a script that automatically checks my scores every 5 minutes and logs the results to a database. So I can see real-time results. I've can even view a graph of the vots & how they affect the average. The only thing that throws it off is when somebody goes back & changes a score. Sometimes it doesn't catch every vote if there is more than one vote in a 5 minute period.
Here's a sample of my backlight graph. Click to enlarge
Message edited by author 2006-01-12 16:16:16. |
|
|
01/12/2006 04:16:16 PM · #142 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: Originally posted by shanksware: first 40 votes 5.125
next 40 votes 5.820
next 40 votes 6.075
last 22 votes 5.909
Votes: 142
Views: 182
Avg Vote: 5.7183
Comments: 5
What are you saying here? Are you saying that was your score at 40, 80, and 120 votes? or are you saying that was your average for that block of votes. Either way it doesn't make sense and I wonder if this isn't a server error rather than trolls. You seem to say that you have both a 5.9 and a 5.7 at 142 votes. Although changing votes is a possible answer, I don't think it's very likely...
kinda weird? or is this kinda normal? | |
sorry, wasn't very clear was it.
I'm saying that the first 40 votes averaged 5.125, then the next 40 averaged 5.820, etc.
first 40 5.125
next 40 5.820 - (cumulative 5.4875)
next 40 6.075 - (cumulative 5.6833)
last 22 5.909
for a score (so far) of 5.7183
just wondering if scores usually bounce around like that. it would be WAY NICE to drop the 1st 40. But, they are probably more correct than the last 102 |
|
|
01/12/2006 04:19:38 PM · #143 |
Great score Silvestro.
Votes: 161
Views: 220
Avg Vote: 6.x416
Comments: 11
Favorites: 3
Wish Lists: 1
Updated: 01/12/06 04:12 pm
Don't wanna jinx the score and let the trolls see it :)
|
|
|
01/12/2006 06:28:50 PM · #144 |
Uh oh, it's turning into a rout...last 4 scores: 3,3,3,2
Votes: 145
Views: 174
Avg Vote: 5.6207
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
|
|
|
01/12/2006 06:54:00 PM · #145 |
Old Maggoty seems to be thrashing the place again huh?
Mine just went down again :( |
|
|
01/12/2006 07:13:33 PM · #146 |
Originally posted by Rikki: Old Maggoty seems to be thrashing the place again huh?
Mine just went down again :( |
OoOoh...That is a seriously creepy photo! |
|
|
01/12/2006 07:55:08 PM · #147 |
|
|
01/12/2006 08:00:08 PM · #148 |
Hey, these are not backlit! DNMC!!! |
|
|
01/12/2006 08:14:25 PM · #149 |
*LoL* The other two are not near so unnerving. :P |
|
|
01/12/2006 08:44:01 PM · #150 |
Originally posted by soup: i didn't mean it in a negative way - only saying that it appears the 'main' light is coming from above. i don't thing the upper highlights were created through the translucency of the snail. also i would expect more light on the lower portion if the main light was behind. |
Sure, the light's coming more from above than from beneath (that's why you get the rimlight on the top) but backlighting can come from all sorts of angles; "backlighting" doesn't mean "directly into the light" as I'm positive (from your post) you understand. In any case, the strong rimlighting is one definitive feature of most studio backlighting.
R. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/20/2024 12:26:16 AM EDT.