| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/09/2005 10:39:16 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by KaDi:
Isn't there some kind of flaw in the logic of this sentence? |
I was thinking the same thing. ;-) |
Doh! :-P
yaknowutimeanvern.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 10:39:25 AM · #27 |
While the technique is not new, each one of these motion blurs turned out quite unique (IMHO):
And as far as I know, this was done only by a painter before:
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 10:49:42 AM · #28 |
I have never seen this before.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 11:02:33 AM · #29 |
Originally posted by gloda:
I have never seen this before.
|
Been done before: 
jejeje™
R.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 11:05:59 AM · #30 |
Every photo is unique and has never been taken before or since.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 11:07:43 AM · #31 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 11:47:14 AM · #32 |
Don't think this has ever bene done:
A "splash" of a different kind:
This one's just a little different:
 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:00:35 PM · #33 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:01:11 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by Palmetto_Pixels:
Black light nude with "glow" paint |
Done it at least a year back. I don't think i have any of the nude ones uploaded right now, but here is one from the set before i lost the panties.
Click here until i uplaod it sorry!
I'll find a nude one from the set for the real debunk ;)
But i have seen others do it before me too sorry.
Here we go...
Message edited by author 2005-11-09 12:18:10. |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:06:24 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by Palmetto_Pixels:
How 'bout this one...
Black light nude with "glow" paint |
Well, considering I contemplated the blacklight nude (albeit without paint). I am sure it's been done. Especially with the popularity of blacklight and glow paint in raver communities. |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:06:28 PM · #36 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Originally posted by gloda:
I have never seen this before.
|
Been done before:
jejeje™
R. |
Nah, that doesn't count, it's my own image. I cold have posted the old one just as well.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:45:08 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by gloda:
Originally posted by bear_music:
Originally posted by gloda:
I have never seen this before.
|
Been done before:
jejeje™
R. |
Nah, that doesn't count, it's my own image. I cold have posted the old one just as well. |
Just yanking your chain... Actually, I remember seeing a whole portfolio of prints by a "famous" photographer, of furniture with elongated shadows in odd juxtapositions, many years ago, but I can't remember who it was. It was the work of a real big-name photographer, I know that much...
R.
Message edited by author 2005-11-09 15:46:07. |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:49:40 PM · #38 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:50:45 PM · #39 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 01:11:19 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Actually, I remember seeing a whole portfolio of prints by a "famous" photographer of furniture with elongated shadows...
R.
|
If you remember, tell me please, I'd be interested in that.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 01:38:11 PM · #41 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 01:46:55 PM · #42 |
I bet you have never seen fire photos like
the ones I took some months ago:
//www.mrx.no/album09.html
They are unique in the sense that they are mushroom shaped,
and have a silk like texture
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 02:24:03 PM · #43 |
try this for size :)
 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:15:37 PM · #44 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:34:09 PM · #45 |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:39:04 PM · #46 |
Originally posted by gloda:
Originally posted by bear_music:
Actually, I remember seeing a whole portfolio of prints by a "famous" photographer of furniture with elongated shadows...
R.
|
If you remember, tell me please, I'd be interested in that. |
Will do... It was a LONG time ago. I remember they were fascinating, however. One of them in particular was a Frank Lloyd Wright ladderback chair, and it was utterly transformed by its shadow.
R. |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:39:41 PM · #47 |
Not to state the obvious, but every single image captured is unique in some way, even if its uniqueness is painfully subtle.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:42:15 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by idnic:
Not to state the obvious, but every single image captured is unique in some way, even if its uniqueness is painfully subtle. |
Not to state the obvious, but I'm not speaking in molecular terms.
:-P
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:46:16 PM · #49 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
Not to state the obvious, but I'm not speaking in molecular terms.
:-P |
LOL You know what I mean, unless we were in a very controlled situation, you and I couldn't take the same shot if we tried. Think of the Shoes challenge, hundreds of people photographed a very simple everyday object and no 2 pictures were alike even though all were similar.
|
|
|
|
11/09/2005 03:51:55 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by Zoomdak:
|
I've got photos just like this also, but black cat rather than a simaese. I have them with both garter snakes and milk snakes for that matter. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 09:29:36 PM EDT.
