| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/18/2002 01:30:38 PM · #1 |
i have 60 votes and one comment. LOL. That makes my comment ratio 1.67%. Wooohooo!!!
I wonder if that is worth some kind of special award this week?
Other people seeing similarly low levels of commentary?
* This message has been edited by the author on 11/18/2002 1:46:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
11/18/2002 01:34:01 PM · #2 |
3 out of 57. Maybe people commented themselves out last week with 300+ submissions :-)
-crabAPPL3 |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 01:41:33 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 01:46:47 PM · #4 |
| 3 out of 66 votes and rather high score - odd? |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 01:50:56 PM · #5 |
2-[for]-66
* This message has been edited by the author on 11/18/2002 4:29:32 PM. |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 02:25:11 PM · #6 |
| Last week I got the lowest number of comments for any of my pictures: 5. Today I feel better because in the first morning I have 9 comments. |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 02:43:13 PM · #7 |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 03:00:31 PM · #8 |
I have a rather low number of comments too. (2 for 69 votes) But this is probably my fault. My subject, though well composed and in good focus, does not make for a show-stopping image... nothing much to comment on! (seems like I have had this problem lately)
Still, the ratio for everyone does seem a bit on the low side. |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 03:16:56 PM · #9 |
| 71 votes 2 swell comments |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 03:24:56 PM · #10 |
77 votes - 4 comments. 5.64. My streak of 3 entries of + 6.0 has come to an end. boo hoo hoo. :)
|
|
|
|
11/18/2002 03:45:07 PM · #11 |
| 82 Votes and 3 measely comments!! |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 04:10:42 PM · #12 |
Votes: 80 *
Average Vote: 4.388 *
Comments: 9
Boy, I sure learned what NOT to do in this challege.
|
|
|
|
11/18/2002 04:22:14 PM · #13 |
ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no. <sob> |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 04:29:46 PM · #14 |
| 79 votes with 11 comments |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 05:35:02 PM · #15 |
| 80 votes and 7 comments. Took me almost a week to get 7 comments last challenge. |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 05:56:17 PM · #16 |
| 90 votes- 5 comments- and getting hammered by the scoring again... heh... |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 06:24:47 PM · #17 |
83 votes
Low Score for a picture that I personally think is well taken, but with a lousy title.(confuses people a lot)
Only 3 comments.
Guess I should learn a couple of things in the area of what not to do.
|
|
|
|
11/18/2002 08:00:37 PM · #18 |
| I've gotten 5 comments for 105 votes. Average vote: 5.715. :( |
|
|
|
11/18/2002 10:58:23 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by ganders:
ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no. <sob>
Man, that hurts doesn't it. Same story here. With only one or two exceptions, my scores with my "little" camera were much better than with my new one. I just explain it away by saying that I am still "learning" the new one.
(This comment was actually from karmat, didn't realize the default was set to hubby nards656 - sorry!)
* This message has been edited by the author on 11/18/2002 10:56:16 PM.
|
|
|
|
11/18/2002 11:26:00 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by ganders:
ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no. <sob>
Well my scrappy, scratched and battered HP C20 is doing better than the average I've been able to eek out of my G2 in the past year, so there
is no accounting for camera quality :)
|
|
|
|
11/18/2002 11:54:01 PM · #21 |
Probably because you're not too worried about playing the settings on the camera rather than just getting a nice photo, i.e. interesting perspective or composition :)
Originally posted by Gordon:
Originally posted by ganders:
[i]ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no. <sob>
Well my scrappy, scratched and battered HP C20 is doing better than the average I've been able to eek out of my G2 in the past year, so there
is no accounting for camera quality :)
[/i]
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 06:55:30 PM EDT.
