Author | Thread |
|
11/17/2002 05:52:56 PM · #1 |
Does anyone know the difference between normal filters (UV, polariser etc.) and "digital" filters?
I was heading over to 7dayshop.com to get some for our shiny new Dimage7 and noticed that they sell both types. The only difference I can see is that ones with "digital" in the name are about three times the price!! Surely, a filter is a filter?
Mystified... |
|
|
11/17/2002 06:19:17 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by ganders: Does anyone know the difference between normal filters (UV, polariser etc.) and "digital" filters?
I was heading over to 7dayshop.com to get some for our shiny new Dimage7 and noticed that they sell both types. The only difference I can see is that ones with "digital" in the name are about three times the price!! Surely, a filter is a filter?
Mystified...
None of the filters i have bought are specified as 'digital' filters.. i didn't know there was a difference..
|
|
|
11/17/2002 06:31:43 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by jmsetzler: Originally posted by ganders: [i]Does anyone know the difference between normal filters (UV, polariser etc.) and "digital" filters?
I was heading over to 7dayshop.com to get some for our shiny new Dimage7 and noticed that they sell both types. The only difference I can see is that ones with "digital" in the name are about three times the price!! Surely, a filter is a filter?
Mystified...
None of the filters i have bought are specified as 'digital' filters.. i didn't know there was a difference.. [/i]
There should be no difference. The filtering is taking place in front of the optics, and in front of a detector ( digital or film). Since in many cases the goal is to reproduce the output of film, you would like the filters to be the same. I would have guessed that the phrase "digital filter" would be software based. If there were a difference based on a detector response function, I would guess that Canon or Nikon would have made folks aware of it - and I don't believe they have.
|
|
|
11/17/2002 07:03:34 PM · #4 |
the only thing that gets brought up is that many digital cameras use a contrast based through the lens focusing system, which can be disrupted by linear polarising filters.
So you might need a circlar polarising filter, depending on your camera. |
|
|
11/18/2002 11:11:24 AM · #5 |
Thanks Gordon - I tend to go for circular polarisers for my SLR too, since I heard they are better for most AF lenses...
Sounds like a gimmick perhaps....
|
|
|
11/24/2002 11:47:20 PM · #6 |
Yeah, it's just an advertising gimmick...Digital filters vs. Traditional Filters .... As someone already pointed out Linear Polarizers can mess with the camera's AF system but that's about it.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 09:29:33 PM EDT.