Author | Thread |
|
04/08/2005 08:19:43 AM · #51 |
Originally posted by mikasi: ...I'm ashamed to admit it, but my fellow Canon users - at least in here - lack a sense of joy and humor and about themselves and photography. ... |
Yes, it's always a cloudy day in my world. My photography sucks; ...hell, I suck! I just ordered a 20D and am so bummed about it. Now my images (and I) are going to suck even more. :-( |
|
|
04/08/2005 09:49:09 AM · #52 |
back to Nuno's comments about wedding photography - No two wedding photographers seem to agree on what to shoot, how to shoot or even how many to shoot.
One big name pro claims to use a Nikon 4Mp DLSR in Med JPG - and get 20x30 prints that are saleable.
One photog shoots 1500+ pics in an 8 hour wedding...others shoot 400.
The best advice i get was: shoot RAW in the church - the formals, the ceremony. The reception and outside shots can be JPG.
And for testing purposes...here are 2 unprocessed 300D pics - just cropped, nothing else. camera is set to default parameters. I tried to lessen in-camera sharpening and could not get it back in PP, so default seems to work best (for me) Both were/are JPG captures. I have a RAW one I took to compare, but have not looked at it.
Not L glass, not Di/DX glass..
Vivitar all manual lens, M42 mount on extension tube
$75 tamron 28-80 f3.5-5.6
Message edited by author 2005-04-08 09:50:05.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/29/2024 06:54:51 AM EDT.