Author | Thread |
|
12/14/2004 07:25:51 AM · #1 |
Just wondering if any of you D70 users have had to replace yours? My collegue is now on his 4th D70. 1st one had dust on the sensor, 2nd one had hot pixels and the 3rd one had a faulty button. These were all brand new from Jessops (UK). I am just curious and not trying to bash the D70 as If I was looking a DSLR now it would probably be my 1st choice.
Message edited by author 2004-12-14 07:26:07.
|
|
|
12/14/2004 07:28:59 AM · #2 |
No problems here.... works like a charm. :-) I also know quite a few people with D70s and none of them have had problems.
I think your collegue is jinxed! ;-)
|
|
|
12/14/2004 07:51:37 AM · #3 |
No problems here either. Although I did seem to get dust on the sensor early on, but the Manfrotto Rocket bulb cleared it easily. |
|
|
12/14/2004 07:55:35 AM · #4 |
I have had a little dust but it was very simple to remove with a blower bulb. It also had a fall off a table the other day without a scratch or fault so I'm very happy with it so far.
|
|
|
12/14/2004 08:08:06 AM · #5 |
I know two people who have them and have had nothing but great results with them!
|
|
|
12/14/2004 08:15:49 AM · #6 |
I'm fine with mine. No hiccups whatsoever. |
|
|
12/14/2004 08:16:44 AM · #7 |
no problems here and I tote mine around a bit. I've had a little dust from chaning lenses a lot, but have easily cleaned it. I'm still in love with it.
I was actually at the local Nikon dealer the other day and mentioned I wanted to get another body so I had a backup. I mentioned upgrading to a D2X for my main body and keeping the D70 for the back. He actually suggested just getting another D70 body, rather than the D2X.
|
|
|
12/14/2004 10:55:54 AM · #8 |
everyone will end up with dust on their sensors, that's just a product of having a dSLR :)
hot pixels and the faulty button. sounds like your buddy just got unlucky and got a couple rejects :( very unfortunate.
i hope the company he got it from has swapped them for him at no cost.
|
|
|
12/14/2004 11:24:00 AM · #9 |
I just love my D-70 no problems here. |
|
|
12/14/2004 11:50:35 AM · #10 |
This is all great to hear, since I'm considering the D70 as my next cam. I won't be able to afford one until at least summer. Does Nikon have anything new coming down the pipe between now and then that might drive the cost of a D70 down? |
|
|
12/14/2004 11:56:37 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by jbeazell: This is all great to hear, since I'm considering the D70 as my next cam. I won't be able to afford one until at least summer. Does Nikon have anything new coming down the pipe between now and then that might drive the cost of a D70 down? |
I wish! I would like a Fuji S2, but they are not down in price. Hell, an older S1 is still more than a Rebel in most places i find it! |
|
|
12/14/2004 02:59:43 PM · #12 |
bump for the other half of the world.
|
|
|
12/14/2004 03:04:12 PM · #13 |
I got mine as an open box from Club Mac. FOund out why. The mirror was sticking sometimes. Got to be a problem and sent it in. One month later I got it back.
Not bad if you ask me. I got $300 off the Kit when I bought it!! (C:
|
|
|
12/14/2004 03:11:29 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by jbeazell: This is all great to hear, since I'm considering the D70 as my next cam. I won't be able to afford one until at least summer. Does Nikon have anything new coming down the pipe between now and then that might drive the cost of a D70 down? |
$200.00 cash back in Australia at the moment.
|
|
|
12/14/2004 06:14:35 PM · #15 |
Still on my 1st D70. Shot maybe 3,000 - 4,000 pictures. Works great. Love it. |
|
|
12/14/2004 06:18:32 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by jbeazell: This is all great to hear, since I'm considering the D70 as my next cam. I won't be able to afford one until at least summer. Does Nikon have anything new coming down the pipe between now and then that might drive the cost of a D70 down? |
I'm with you...summer is soooo far away!
|
|
|
12/14/2004 07:41:05 PM · #17 |
|
|
12/14/2004 08:10:59 PM · #18 |
This statement is not true because Olympus DsLRs (the E-1 and E-300) have automatic dust clearing everytime the camera starts up with a supersonic high frequency wave filter. It works very well. Plus, the E-1 is all metal, as well as, water proof. It's a superior made body that is meant for professional use. Though their lenses are not as great in number, they are of exceptional quality.
Originally posted by jxpfeer: everyone will end up with dust on their sensors, that's just a product of having a dSLR :)
|
|
|
|
12/15/2004 08:43:22 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by jbeazell: This is all great to hear, since I'm considering the D70 as my next cam. I won't be able to afford one until at least summer. Does Nikon have anything new coming down the pipe between now and then that might drive the cost of a D70 down? |
short of another rebate, i don't really see the d70 price coming down at the retailers any time soon.
i came from a 602z as well. it's great, very easy transition. there is of course a bit of a learning curve to the SLR, but if you're used to your 602, you should have no problems switching up to the d70. it's a fantastic camera, i think you'l love it!
|
|
|
12/15/2004 09:02:06 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by Olyuzi: Plus, the E-1 is all metal, as well as, water proof. It's a superior made body that is meant for professional use. |
Careful. There is a difference between water-proof and splash-proof. As far as I know, Olympus states that the E-1 is "splash proof".
On the other hand, I was told by a Canon rep that their 1-series bodies, when fitted with a weather-sealed L-lens, are rated for "wet condition use" in rain as heavy as 3 inches an hour.
Also, read this post about a guy who accidentally submerged his 1D Mark II and 24-70/2.8 in a creek... he pulled it out and it worked fine. =]
Message edited by author 2004-12-15 09:03:31. |
|
|
12/15/2004 09:04:16 AM · #21 |
I wonder if it's legal for Canon to offer a rebate on D70's? "Turn in your D70 and we'll give you a 20D for only $300." Nice way to get someone out of a system. lol
M
|
|
|
12/15/2004 10:27:54 AM · #22 |
Our D70 has been absolutely fine, aside from a slight amount of crap picked up on the sensor in the last couple of weeks. Considering what it's been through (2 months in Africa and 3 weeks just now in Antarctica) I'm quite pleased that a couple of spots (that should clean off fine) is the only thing wrong with it.
I'm growing increasingly disillusioned with the Nikon focus system, but that's for another thread... :)
|
|
|
12/15/2004 10:42:23 AM · #23 |
No problems with mine either. I think all dSLRs have similar issues with dust (excepting that ultrasonic doodad on the Olympus bodies - I think it's Olympus?). My d70 has been rock solid and dependable. I'm anxious to see how it does in cold weather now that winter is upon me. I'm anticipating good results.
I'm happy with the Nikon focus system... It's highly dependent on what lens you use though. Big difference between AF, AF-S, D, G, etc. My 70-300 f/4-5.6 G lens has horrendous focusing. Slow, and hunts like crazy. On the other hand, my kit lens seems to latch onto a target instantly and silently. Good glass behaves better than cheap glass in every way.
(Ganders, not trying to imply cheap glass is your issue since I have no idea what you use! Just wanted to point out that lens has a big effect on Nikon's AF performance).
|
|
|
12/15/2004 10:54:37 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by cghubbell: No problems with mine either. I think all dSLRs have similar issues with dust (excepting that ultrasonic doodad on the Olympus bodies - I think it's Olympus?). My d70 has been rock solid and dependable. I'm anxious to see how it does in cold weather now that winter is upon me. I'm anticipating good results.
I'm happy with the Nikon focus system... It's highly dependent on what lens you use though. Big difference between AF, AF-S, D, G, etc. My 70-300 f/4-5.6 G lens has horrendous focusing. Slow, and hunts like crazy. On the other hand, my kit lens seems to latch onto a target instantly and silently. Good glass behaves better than cheap glass in every way.
(Ganders, not trying to imply cheap glass is your issue since I have no idea what you use! Just wanted to point out that lens has a big effect on Nikon's AF performance). |
I'm planning on getting my D70 in the very near future, as a base package I'm looking getting the SB600 flash, 50mm 1.8 and the 70-300 G with the D70 (inc 18-70).
I'm reading quite a few bad reviews of the 70-300, I would like to have a the long zoom capability but do not imagine using it too often, is it worth having for occasional use, or best to forget about it.
Also is there a good reason to spend the extra money on the SB800 rather than the SB600?
|
|
|
12/15/2004 11:10:52 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by colda: I'm planning on getting my D70 in the very near future, as a base package I'm looking getting the SB600 flash, 50mm 1.8 and the 70-300 G with the D70 (inc 18-70). |
If you don't need the speed of the 50/1.8, then you would have it covered with the kit. But, certainly, a 1.8 has quite a bit of appliction over a 3.5 variable zoom if you do a lot in the 50mm focal length. It's a highly regarded lens.
Originally posted by colda: I'm reading quite a few bad reviews of the 70-300, I would like to have a the long zoom capability but do not imagine using it too often, is it worth having for occasional use, or best to forget about it. |
When I first bought the D70 with the 70-300G I was happy with it. The zoom would take better shots than my previous digicam, but when compared to what my kit lens did, it just wasn't in the same league. I have not seen *any* good reviews of 70-300G, and in fact discovered that it's not even Nikon glass - it's OEM'd from Tamron.
If you just want more reach for casual shots, then it's a decent lens. If you're trying to see individual pieces of fur on an animal at a distance, you will be disappointed. The autofocus is also disappointing. There is a non-G 70-300 which is marginally better, but still not great. If you're looking for zoom on a budget, check out the 80-200 AF-D. A tad slower a/f than the 70-200 VR (or 80-200 AF-S) but not by much, and roughly 1/2 the price. I know, nowhere near the price of the G, but you get what you pay for, and if you want to be impressed, the G will never live up to it.
Originally posted by colda: Also is there a good reason to spend the extra money on the SB800 rather than the SB600? |
It's all about the budget. You get a slightly quicker recharge, and slightly more flash power on the 800. The 800 also includes a bounce card built-in, and includes a warming gel. The 600 does not include a diffuser. The 800 also has a modeling light and repeating strobe, and can tilt on a 7 degree down angle.
If you're looking for a general purpose flash, and want to save $125, the sb600 is a very respectable and capable unit. I use the 800, and like the built-in bounce card, as well as the extra power since I don't have a fresnel yet. I wouldn't kick the 600 out of bed for eating crackers though :)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/17/2024 02:41:14 PM EDT.