DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> Art Thieves foiled by EXIF data
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 12 of 12, (reverse)
AuthorThread
05/28/2016 01:06:39 PM · #1
How can a crew brilliant enough to pull off this million $$$ heist by disabling sophisticated alarms be stupid enough to send pictures of the stolen items to investigators with the EXIF intact?
05/28/2016 01:23:35 PM · #2
God is in the details ;)

Plus, you have to ask yourself, why would they send the images and ask if the paintings were stolen, in the first place???

Message edited by author 2016-05-28 13:24:21.
05/28/2016 02:09:32 PM · #3
And they couldn't afford to buy a camera?
05/28/2016 05:07:45 PM · #4
Originally posted by GeneralE:

And they couldn't afford to buy a camera?

They probably had some half-baked thought that a rental camera couldn't be traced back to them...
05/28/2016 05:17:11 PM · #5
Originally posted by tanguera:

God is in the details ;)

Plus, you have to ask yourself, why would they send the images and ask if the paintings were stolen, in the first place???


Yeah... Seriously???
05/28/2016 06:20:13 PM · #6
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by GeneralE:

And they couldn't afford to buy a camera?

They probably had some half-baked thought that a rental camera couldn't be traced back to them...

Maybe they've never heard of "cash" ...
05/28/2016 06:34:52 PM · #7
I just love stories like this. Stupid criminals.
05/28/2016 10:35:35 PM · #8
Just goes to prove that there really is no such thing as a criminal mastermind.
05/28/2016 10:40:47 PM · #9
Originally posted by snaffles:

Just goes to prove that there really is no such thing as a criminal mastermind.

Not really ... just that there are a lot of criminal mastermind wannabes. If there were really a "criminal mastermind" out there we -- by definition -- wouldn't know. I hate to quote Donald Rumsfeld, but an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence ... :-(
05/29/2016 01:02:54 AM · #10
Moriarty was based on a real person.

05/29/2016 01:29:50 AM · #11
Originally posted by posthumous:

Moriarty was based on a real person.

So was Sherlock ...
05/29/2016 05:39:45 AM · #12
An art thief this sophisticated doesn't own a stolen camera to take photos?

Part of this rings of they didn't get the thief but instead got some idiot that the thieves either stole the artwork for or sold it to. The photos and the email were a way of trying to anonymously check if the coast was clear to move them.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 05:35:06 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 05:35:06 PM EDT.