| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/22/2014 04:19:01 PM · #151 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by Mike:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
the first part of the rules says that multiple originals have to be of the same scene, doesn't it? |
That depends on how you define a scene. |
Fortunately, the rules define it for you: "(defined as a scene whose composition/framing does not change)" |
then Kens image should have been no deliberation. It should be cut and dry.. |
|
|
|
07/22/2014 04:21:12 PM · #152 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by MattO:
The voters would have voted different without it there. That tells me it's a significant part of the entry. Just as you said with Ken's entry. That tells me it's significant part of the entry. Without the fish, you don't need the bowl, it's a different entry all together. Making it a DQ just as much as Ken's is using your words. |
That tells me the supporting element did its job, but it's still not the primary imapct of the entry. Without the fish, you have the Cat in the Hat playing with three objects instead of four– not quite as interesting, but not a fundamental change either. |
Ken's head is the main subject, gears are the supporting subject. They also did their job. Yet he got a DQ.
|
|
|
|
07/22/2014 04:26:41 PM · #153 |
Originally posted by Mike:
then Kens image should have been no deliberation. It should be cut and dry.. |
Originally posted by MattO:
Ken's head is the main subject, gears are the supporting subject. |
There's your deliberation, albeit borderline absurd. The surrounding head was not in any plausible sense the main visual impact of Ken's entry.
Message edited by author 2014-07-22 16:28:18. |
|
|
|
07/22/2014 06:15:21 PM · #154 |
Aren't people getting tired of this thread already?
It seems to me the people mad are the ones it didn't effect and the person it affected had no problem with it at all.
Let's give it a rest, and in the mean time here's some funny memes to laugh at...
//buymelaughs.com/20-funny-inspirational-quotes/ |
|
|
|
07/22/2014 07:02:14 PM · #155 |
It was a good discussion, but getting a little redundant. As mentioned, some of it comes down to interpretation and collectively, the SC's majority interpretation has the last word. I'm fine with that. The hole in my head has long since healed up. Let's move on.
|
|
|
|
07/22/2014 08:44:17 PM · #156 |
| Agreed. This thread has reached its logical conclusion. If you want to debate the artwork rule and how to improve it, please start a thread for that purpose. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 12:55:12 PM EDT.
