| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/30/2013 02:12:51 PM · #1 |
I'ts been awhile since I've entered and I can't remember.
Can you use liquefy to shave a few pounds off of a model in advanced editing? Assuming it only effects them and no background elements.
I'm just looking through 2012 and deciding whether I need to re edit an image or not as I think I remember doing it.
|
|
|
|
01/30/2013 02:18:37 PM · #2 |
Specifically giving a digital tummy tuck lol.
I've done some reading in past forums and it seems to be an OK thing to do as long as its nothing major. |
|
|
|
01/30/2013 02:19:35 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
01/30/2013 02:52:24 PM · #4 |
A very minor change should pass muster. The question is, how much is too much? the rule you want to avoid falling afoul of is:
Originally posted by Advanced_Rules:
You may not:
- use distortions to create new effects or radically alter objects.
|
If you are unsure, submit DPC-sized before/after comparison shots to the SC for approval/disapproval prior to the challenge.
|
|
|
|
01/30/2013 03:10:16 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
A very minor change should pass muster. The question is, how much is too much? the rule you want to avoid falling afoul of is:
Originally posted by Advanced_Rules:
You may not:
- use distortions to create new effects or radically alter objects.
|
If you are unsure, submit DPC-sized before/after comparison shots to the SC for approval/disapproval prior to the challenge. |
wait, what? so say i process an image in portrait professional pro, the face warping would be legal? i didn't thank were were allowed to alter the location of pixels with the exception of minor cloning. |
|
|
|
01/30/2013 03:23:52 PM · #6 |
There's no way to make a blanket statement that a particular tool, e.g. the Portrait professional face Warp would or would not be legal. In any case where you are modifying an object, I'd be very careful, because the rules tend to be interpreted, well, let's just say "strictly." So if there is any doubt, submit it for review before the challenge.
But no, there is no prohibition of a (very) minor modification of an object's shape.
|
|
|
|
01/30/2013 03:29:39 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
no.
it should be but no. |
You can do it if there's no evident difference.
I'm not that thin :)
 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 06:45:46 PM EDT.
