| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/15/2010 03:08:14 PM · #51 |
Originally posted by chipuc:
Originally posted by Silent-Shooter:
my score seems to be swinging up and down a lot with each vote. I'm not currently tracking the votes on the monitor trackers but I'm guessing the voters either like it or its a DNMC low vote.
Should be interesting to see the final vote spread when its over. |
I agree. |
glad someone agrees. maybe we should stick together and form a secret troll photography group |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 03:31:37 PM · #52 |
My score is also swinging wildly up and down, currently down.
Surely the interpretation should be three fold?
1. Incorrect Exposure
2. Reduced Exposure Value
3. Reduced strobe/flash output |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 03:56:18 PM · #53 |
Originally posted by MelonMusketeer:
Details: Create a photograph that is purposefully underexposed for its effectiveness.
It sort of says that it should be underexposed as shot. So I went with that too. |
I don't see it that way, actually. Certainly, back in the film days, we'd sometimes print for underexposure, when we wanted that effect. In fact, I think it's kind of foolish to "waste" an image by underexposing it in camera, when you can do the same thing in post on a normally-exposed image, pretty much, certainly if you shoot RAW.
So for me the challenge is about a "look", a certain density and moodiness that comes from pulling all the values way, way down.. I don't really care how the photographer got to that point.
R. |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 04:04:57 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by MelonMusketeer:
4.08 now, so I'm closing in on you B .. |
3.92 now. Low was 3.84. |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 04:09:26 PM · #55 |
I quite liked them:
You have rated 109 of 109 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 5.8899.
|
|
|
|
09/15/2010 04:10:52 PM · #56 |
In my picture I needed to get some details out and I knew where I was going to take the picture it would be dark and windy so to crank those details out I needed to overexpose (although the original is still murky and dull) so that when I pulled the curves down the most important bits stayed while the rest faded away. It just helped to expose it the way I wanted to.
Votes: 50
Views: 84
Avg Vote: 6.8000
Comments: 2 |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 04:31:42 PM · #57 |
OMG I'm begining to think I entered this in the wrong challenge lol
Votes: 55
Views: 99
Avg Vote: 4.7818
Comments: 2 |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 05:20:25 PM · #58 |
okay it is now moving up from 5.3
phhhhhhhhhewww |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 05:22:13 PM · #59 |
Originally posted by UrfaTheGreat:
In my picture I needed to get some details out and I knew where I was going to take the picture it would be dark and windy so to crank those details out I needed to overexpose (although the original is still murky and dull) so that when I pulled the curves down the most important bits stayed while the rest faded away. It just helped to expose it the way I wanted to.
Votes: 50
Views: 84
Avg Vote: 6.8000
Comments: 2 |
Gee you left out which photo it is. |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 08:40:43 PM · #60 |
Votes: 58
Views: 106
Avg Vote: 5.4828
Comments: 4
Massive drop lol, at least a few liked it.
_____________________________________________
Votes: 59
Views: 108
Avg Vote: 5.4407
Comments: 4
That was a 3.
Message edited by author 2010-09-15 20:57:27. |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 10:15:52 PM · #61 |
Originally posted by BrianR:
Originally posted by UrfaTheGreat:
In my picture I needed to get some details out and I knew where I was going to take the picture it would be dark and windy so to crank those details out I needed to overexpose (although the original is still murky and dull) so that when I pulled the curves down the most important bits stayed while the rest faded away. It just helped to expose it the way I wanted to.
Votes: 50
Views: 84
Avg Vote: 6.8000
Comments: 2 |
Gee you left out which photo it is. |
lol! I just should have just said I agree with bear music and left it at that |
|
|
|
09/15/2010 10:25:16 PM · #62 |
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS got my first comment by  UrfaTheGreat life is good now!
|
|
|
|
09/16/2010 04:58:49 AM · #63 |
Originally posted by JulietNN:
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS got my first comment by UrfaTheGreat life is good now! |
I'm jealous,!!!! :):):) |
|
|
|
09/16/2010 06:43:09 AM · #64 |
Originally posted by BrianR:
Originally posted by JulietNN:
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS got my first comment by UrfaTheGreat life is good now! |
I'm jealous,!!!! :):):) |
Me too!
Come on Urfa - seeing as you are kicking all of our asses, please try and comment on all of our photos so we can see where we went wrong and you didn't!
Thanks |
|
|
|
09/16/2010 09:11:27 AM · #65 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
So for me the challenge is about a "look", a certain density and moodiness that comes from pulling all the values way, way down.. I don't really care how the photographer got to that point.
R. |
I totally agree. There are some fine examples here. I voted quite high on them. :) |
|
|
|
09/16/2010 07:22:47 PM · #66 |
My second highest start in a year.
Votes: 76
Views: 136
Avg Vote: 5.6184
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
|
|
|
|
09/16/2010 08:37:12 PM · #67 |
Originally posted by paulbtlw:
I quite liked them:
You have rated 109 of 109 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 5.8899. |
Hey Paul,
Not sure how this works, but you didn't leave a comment on mine :-(
How's it 100% then????? |
|
|
|
09/16/2010 08:42:03 PM · #68 |
Originally posted by tanguera:
Originally posted by paulbtlw:
I quite liked them:
You have rated 109 of 109 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 5.8899. |
Hey Paul,
Not sure how this works, but you didn't leave a comment on mine :-(
How's it 100% then????? |
100% votes, not comments.
|
|
|
|
09/16/2010 08:53:33 PM · #69 |
| Ah, yes. It would help if I actually read the message.... |
|
|
|
09/16/2010 08:57:57 PM · #70 |
Looking pretty good. Been flirting with 6 since this afternoon. Not gone over yet, though.
Votes: 75
Views: 136
Avg Vote: 6.0000
Comments: 3
|
|
|
|
09/16/2010 10:40:02 PM · #71 |
Votes: 80
Views: 150
Avg Vote: 5.3750
Comments: 7
constantly dropping. =(
Votes: 83
Views: 157
Avg Vote: 5.3253
Comments: 7
At this rate it will be sub-5 by rollover...
Votes: 85
Views: 160
Avg Vote: 5.2471
Comments: 7
So many sub-4 votes, wtf. Average of 3.166 with the last 6 votes.
Message edited by author 2010-09-17 01:14:40. |
|
|
|
09/17/2010 11:42:39 AM · #72 |
Well I have never seen voting like this at all.
I have gone from 5.2, to 5.3 in 2 days, then jumped up steadily to 6.2.
I have only ever had that happen on one of shot.
so there is hope for everyone! |
|
|
|
09/17/2010 11:56:48 AM · #73 |
I had a similar jump, but downside from 6.2 to to 5.3
:))
Message edited by author 2010-09-17 11:57:03. |
|
|
|
09/17/2010 12:07:02 PM · #74 |
4.38 now. I must have overexposed.
|
|
|
|
09/17/2010 02:54:30 PM · #75 |
Originally posted by Jutilda:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
So for me the challenge is about a "look", a certain density and moodiness that comes from pulling all the values way, way down.. I don't really care how the photographer got to that point.
R. |
I totally agree. There are some fine examples here. I voted quite high on them. :) |
That's what I was going for, but apparently missed by a mile (or a continent or maybe by a few galaxies).
Votes: 91
Views: 158
Avg Vote: 3.8571
Comments: 1
Never had a brown before and now I may get 2 in the same week. So much for thinking I could get excited about photography again. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 03:31:07 PM EDT.
