exposure - DPChallenge Forums

Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS

09/03/2010 11:12:39 PM · #1

okay so i know most people on here aren't too fond of 1x.com but i was looking through some photos over there and noticed that a lot of the given exposure times are like "10/800" or "10/3200". what does this mean? is it ten combined shots at 1/80 or 1/320 respectively? i have even noticed 86/1 and have no idea what that could mean. i have just never seen anyone note an exposure like that on this site. can anyone shed some light on it for me?

vawendy

Sony Alpha 1

09/03/2010 11:15:32 PM · #2

Originally posted by leonedavis:

I think 1x is spectacular -- even though I've never had anything accepted there.

But I've never seen exposures like that... that's bizarre.

09/03/2010 11:21:46 PM · #3

there's one for you to look at

//1x.com/v2/#?userid=&from=1&to=20&series=&location=&tag=&picname=&treshold=0&screeners=&category=&album=&free=tree&order=votes&searchname=&friends=&search=true&action=view&id=17261&size=L

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM

09/04/2010 12:05:12 AM · #4

so i guess im not the only one who doesnt get it

Cory

Canon EOS-1D Mark IV

09/04/2010 12:13:43 AM · #5

Originally posted by leonedavis:

fractions are fractions... divide the top by the bottom and that's the exposure in seconds.

(either that or this is a programming screwup..)

Bear_Music

Samsung Galaxy S21, S21+, S21 Ultra

Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE OSS

09/04/2010 12:17:10 AM · #6

Originally posted by coryboehne:

Originally posted by leonedavis:
okay so i know most people on here aren't too fond of 1x.com but i was looking through some photos over there and noticed that a lot of the given exposure times are like "10/800" or "10/3200". what does this mean? is it ten combined shots at 1/80 or 1/320 respectively? i have even noticed 86/1 and have no idea what that could mean. i have just never seen anyone note an exposure like that on this site. can anyone shed some light on it for me?

fractions are fractions... divide the top by the bottom and that's the exposure in seconds.

(either that or this is a programming screwup..)

A lot of the time when I look at complete EXIF, I see a nominal 1/320 expressed as 10/3204 or somesuch. So I think that the camera's doing some very precise changes, and the "simple" exif is just rounding off. I suspect those informations are a data grab straight from the full EXIF?

R.