| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/29/2010 12:19:23 PM · #1 |
My brother's looking at these two lenses, but I don't know anything about either. Does anyone have any input?
Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM
It seems like the 18-200 would be much more interesting, but I thought the wider the range, the worse the quality (on the shorter lenses). Is that still true?
|
|
|
|
08/29/2010 12:27:36 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
My brother's looking at these two lenses, but I don't know anything about either. Does anyone have any input?
Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS *** This looks pretty good to me ***
Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM
It seems like the 18-200 would be much more interesting, but I thought the wider the range, the worse the quality (on the shorter lenses). Is that still true? |
|
|
|
|
08/29/2010 12:30:20 PM · #3 |
Yeah what he said, i mean both go to 200mm but that one starts at 18, and its IS which i think i heard are better??
Then again dont listen to me, im not exactly a genius haha
Message edited by author 2010-08-29 12:32:19. |
|
|
|
08/29/2010 12:31:33 PM · #4 |
18-200mm is a better all around choice, as it's giving you your wide & telephoto. Also you're gaining IS from it whereas the 28mm does not have IS.
The only downside if he upgrades to a full frame it can't be used. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 03:14:09 AM EDT.
