| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/14/2009 01:05:10 AM · #1 |
Agree.......
Maybe not linking the long arguments, that sometimes get personal.........
Maybe having a Forum thread where the SC post examples (as they come up) of validated/DQ images, and why they are legal/illegal, and a list of programs/methods (with possibly examples) that are legal/illegal.......SC only can post to it to keep it short.......
Not saying that this should be created overnight, but something to be added to, but easy to go through, rather than the 10 pages arguing over DQ's that exists and is hard to use as a reference........
Also, a little additonal info in the DQ box on the image could also help explain the DQ, and might reduce the disagreement/argument/SC bashing that has occurred of late |
|
|
|
07/14/2009 12:25:26 AM · #2 |
I actually think this is a good idea.
Another one would be when we *finally* get the whole "artwork" rule hammered out -- have a link to a thread where people are discussing it, etc. so people can get a better idea of why the rule exists. |
|
|
|
07/13/2009 10:12:56 PM · #3 |
When a ruleset is modified and the details are posted in a forum thread, that thread should be linked to the ruleset. For example, this Administrators Announcement thread (LucisArts, Photomatix and Virtual Photographer) states that certain software tools are no longer allowed in Basic Editing, yet nothing in the Basic Editing ruleset mentions this.
There may be other examples. If you know of any, please feel free to post the thread links in here. Thanks. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 01:22:28 AM EDT.
