| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/12/2006 10:31:10 PM · #1 |
I think I made mine worst!
Entry
Edit
What do you think? |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:45:15 AM · #2 |
what an adorable little girl! |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 08:32:16 PM · #3 |
 straight
 edited
btw, i only entered this because i thought the contrast and colors were good straight from the camera. not a picture i'd normally spend time editing.
Message edited by author 2006-07-11 20:33:06. |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 07:59:17 PM · #4 |
edited: 
straight from the camera:  |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 07:58:28 PM · #5 |
straight 
processed : not sure i like it either way.  |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 07:33:51 PM · #6 |
 strait
 edited |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 05:06:00 PM · #7 |
Straight...
edited...
outtake...
 |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 02:36:53 PM · #8 |
my straight and edited versions
Edited version: cropped, levels, hue/sat, curves, cloned out flower on right aspect of photo.
original:
Edited:
|
|
|
|
07/11/2006 02:35:26 PM · #9 |
straight 
processed 
same scene, a different perspective (older photo)  |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 02:21:50 PM · #10 |
Straight. and might i add Validated!
Edited.
As you can see by looking at the original I pretty much threw everything Adobe Has at this one. I am happy with the results as is my wife. She is going to print this one and send it to grandma. She usually only prints the photos she takes. So for today only i am da man! ha!
Message edited by author 2006-07-11 16:33:02.
|
|
|
|
07/11/2006 11:46:57 AM · #11 |
Entry:
Edited: |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 10:47:41 AM · #12 |
| How do I add pictures to the message? |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 10:14:15 AM · #13 |
original  editted  |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 09:18:23 AM · #14 |
original  edited 
Message edited by author 2006-07-11 09:18:43. |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 08:38:58 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by Bosborne:
[quote=OdysseyF22] Original: 
I like the original way better. Just love that sky! added this to my favs. |
Hey, thanks! I liked the lightening of the water and boats in the edit, but you may be right - the sky isn't quite the same. Maybe I'll have to play with the masking a bit more and even it out. My edit was sort of a quick job :-)
|
|
|
|
07/11/2006 02:41:04 AM · #16 |
When I read about the challenge, I told myself I was going to set my
in-camera sharpness, saturation & contrast up, then forgot to - crap.
Straight:  Edited: |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 01:17:46 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by dwterry:
Originally posted by Bosborne:
I'm online AGAIN trying to get my point across that my camera ''auto-rotates'' and I shouldn't have been penalized for that.
|
I'm curious... why do you think you were penalized? None of the comments on your image allude to voters thinking about voting lower due to the rotation of the image.
It got only a few low votes (below a four) and while I would personally disagree with the number of 4's it got, I would also disagree with the number of 4's that the first place ribbon winner received as well. But that's just the way it goes... voters spend their votes they way they see the image and how it affects them.
Originally posted by Bosborne:
I think the shot was a great one with fabulous colors!!
So, I am giving myself a pat on the back tonight, for a job well done!!
Thanks for letting me rant.
I am fine now.
Becky |
Ah, good... that's the spirit. :-) |
David,
In answer to your question of why did I think I was penalized? Because, as soon as the challenge was open to vote, a forum was started and someone mentioned that "there sure were going to be some DNMC if it is a portrait and not a landscape." Then the whole forum became this place going on and on about portrait vs. landscape, auto-rotate IN camera and other topics. But it just upset me that even tho no one had even started to view the images, they were already getting DNMC from some people. That's why I named my photo "Let's get this ''straight'', I DID NOT ROTATE!" Lousy title, I know, but I tried to save the pic someway. You are right in saying that "None of the comments on your image allude to voters thinking about voting lower due to the rotation of the image." True, but the voters who DIDN'T comment probably just gave a low vote and moved on without commenting. I do appreciate the comments tho and chose to re-post the image here so I could let folks know how I felt.
Thanks for commenting too!
Becky |
|
|
|
07/10/2006 10:07:16 PM · #18 |
Original: 
Edited: 
|
|
|
|
07/10/2006 10:04:13 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Bosborne:
I'm online AGAIN trying to get my point across that my camera ''auto-rotates'' and I shouldn't have been penalized for that.
|
I'm curious... why do you think you were penalized? None of the comments on your image allude to voters thinking about voting lower due to the rotation of the image.
It got only a few low votes (below a four) and while I would personally disagree with the number of 4's it got, I would also disagree with the number of 4's that the first place ribbon winner received as well. But that's just the way it goes... voters spend their votes they way they see the image and how it affects them.
Originally posted by Bosborne:
I think the shot was a great one with fabulous colors!!
So, I am giving myself a pat on the back tonight, for a job well done!!
Thanks for letting me rant.
I am fine now.
Becky |
Ah, good... that's the spirit. :-)
|
|
|
|
07/10/2006 09:19:23 PM · #20 |
I was so busy during this challenge and only managed about 15 minutes to devote to a shot. It has been really hot and after cleaning stables it only gave me a few minutes to get some shots before the horse flies carried the horses away and the humidity wilted us all and I had to bring them in LOL. To top it all it was overcast!!! Yeah Yeah excuses excuses LOL. I rather liked the plant in the foreground, I thought it gave the shot a bit of depth.
Not my best shot by far but I was having withdrawals as I havent been able to enter anything for a while so decided to do it anyway just so I could press the Update button and get my fix
Original
Edited
|
|
|
|
07/10/2006 09:14:46 PM · #21 |
SUBMITTED: 
eDITED:  |
|
|
|
07/10/2006 09:12:49 PM · #22 |
[quote=OdysseyF22] Original:
I like the original way better. Just love that sky! added this to my favs.
Message edited by author 2006-07-10 21:13:45. |
|
|
|
07/10/2006 08:54:48 PM · #23 |
Original:
Edited: 
I was thrilled that the original did well, but I like the edited version even more. I'm into hyperprocessing right now, although this shot didn't need a lot of it. The sky really was an amazing set of colors naturally.
Edit: Looking at the two side by side now, I could see that I used WAY too much NI in the edit. Redid the editing without NI and reposted.
Message edited by author 2006-07-10 20:57:55.
|
|
|
|
07/10/2006 08:42:13 PM · #24 |
Original - I did NOT rotate - Hence, the title.
Entry - Did nothing - no enhancement needed.
This was the one challenge that SO frustrated me that I actually cleaned out my portfolio here and wanted to NEVER come back!
But, as you can see, I'm online AGAIN trying to get my point across that my camera ''auto-rotates'' and I shouldn't have been penalized for that. I think the shot was a great one with fabulous colors!!
So, I am giving myself a pat on the back tonight, for a job well done!!
Thanks for letting me rant.
I am fine now.
Becky |
|
|
|
07/10/2006 08:27:39 PM · #25 |
Orginal:
After:
Not much different really.... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 06:16:22 PM EDT.
