| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/10/2006 01:46:15 PM · #1 |
.
Message edited by author 2006-01-11 17:09:37. |
|
|
|
01/10/2006 01:27:21 PM · #2 |
A bit late, I know (been lurking on here for too long) but this would be my favorite with the sigma 70-200 f2.8 that I have
//gallery.ninja.org.uk/cbh_rock-trial_main-show/IMG_0995
Either way, if you want more photos of that lens in action:
//gallery.ninja.org.uk/cbh_rock-trial_main-show |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 09:36:22 PM · #3 |
| Well, I am thinking it may be cheaper and better to hire you guys to photograph for me! Great shots, looking at the talent here may be better than buying myself a Christmas gift! |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 04:50:22 PM · #4 |
| Man, I wish Sigma would make more lenses for Olympus! |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 03:19:55 PM · #5 |
Not quite all in there, but the majority were taken with sigma lenses.
sigma |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 03:16:34 PM · #6 |
I took this one with a Sigma 28-80...... |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 11:38:46 AM · #7 |
Sigma 70-200mm all my softball shots are with this lens. (its still for sale)
Softball
Message edited by author 2005-12-21 11:40:38. |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 11:24:02 AM · #8 |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 11:03:57 AM · #9 |
all of my images in my portfolio are taken with sigma lenses. I own 4 of them, all EX type.
|
|
|
|
12/21/2005 08:28:21 AM · #10 |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 04:36:46 AM · #11 |
| Guys these are all great, thanks for the help! I still can't decide, though I am leaning towards the 50-500, I do a lot on insect macros in season. urhhhhh! |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 02:00:29 AM · #12 |
I use the 18-200, the thing hardly comes off my camera...
 |
|
|
|
12/21/2005 01:28:28 AM · #13 |
 
I like the 50-500 because I never know what I am going to shoot. i think I need something long for that shot waaaaay out there, and the interesting shot ends up right at my feet. You dont often need the 50 end, but sometines it is a life saver.
   
You can even put a TC on it to pust the range even further. It is heavy slow and big, but nothing else can do what it does.
    |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 11:26:32 PM · #14 |
50-500
-danny
|
|
|
|
12/20/2005 11:13:49 PM · #15 |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 09:16:49 PM · #16 |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 09:12:18 PM · #17 |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 09:06:35 PM · #18 |
Just a couple of my 50-500 images - (nearly all my Bird pics were taken with this lens, some handheld)
 ..
Here's one from the Sigma 105 macro:
I have just acquired the 28-300 Sigma and am having a ball with it. Some images are likely to be entered in this week's Challenges, so no examples yet. |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 08:59:31 PM · #19 |
Some of my favs from the 70-200mm f2.8
They just happen to be all bird shots.
bazz.
 |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 08:47:50 PM · #20 |
Sigma 70-300 APO Macro, an amazing lens for the money! |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 08:14:03 PM · #21 |
all taken with sigma 70-300mm....
 
 
|
|
|
|
12/20/2005 07:37:41 PM · #22 |
sigma 55-200mm... great lens. |
|
|
|
12/20/2005 06:55:27 PM · #23 |
Sigma 105 Macro
|
|
|
|
12/20/2005 06:33:01 PM · #24 |
 
All of these were taken with the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 in less-than-ideal-lighting situations but still manage to have very good detail and sharpness.
Message edited by author 2005-12-20 18:38:41.
|
|
|
|
12/20/2005 06:20:15 PM · #25 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 07:29:01 PM EDT.
