| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/14/2016 12:19:03 PM · #1 |
I have a Clik Elite bag that's half camera bag, half daypack. Access to the camera part is through a side flap, so I can get the camera out without setting the bag down. But if I'm actively taking pictures, I have a Peak Design capture clip attached to one of the backpack straps. The bag is sturdy and comfortable, and I have room for other stuff besides the camera.
I work with the guys from one of the major review sites. They all seem to take the FStop bags when they go out. |
|
|
|
02/13/2016 11:29:01 AM · #2 |
| Went ahead and ordered a Tamrac Anvil 23... should see it on Tuesday. |
|
|
|
02/12/2016 08:47:43 AM · #3 |
Interesting... I was not aware of Peak Design. I really like the thought they have obviously put into their products. I will definitely look closely at them as I consider what I want to do for a strap. The Everyday Messenger looks like a great bag for its intended use, but is smaller than what I am looking at.
|
|
|
|
02/11/2016 05:53:25 PM · #4 |
If you need more ideas, take a look at Peak Design . They have several products for carrying the camera around. I use their CapturePro, Clutch and Slide which, contrary to Black Rapid (which I also have) doesn't swing around. Good quality products.
They also came up recently with the Everyday Messenger, although this one is a little pricey compared to other bags you've already checked.
By the way, all my bags are LowePro. Those are the best for me... :)
Message edited by author 2016-02-11 17:54:20. |
|
|
|
02/11/2016 03:01:50 PM · #5 |
That is really inexpensive and it looks like it could be a well-built pack, but it looks like a general-purpose pack with provision for a little camera equipment. I'm certainly looking for something that is very photo-centric, and what I'm seeing is that the sturdier packs generally don't have a quick-access point as a feature. After consideration, I think I am willing to give on that desire.
I really, really appreciate all the valuable input in this thread; the DPC community is, IMO, second to none in that regard. I think I've narrowed it down to two of the Tamrac Anvil bags, just need to figure out which and pull the trigger.
|
|
|
|
02/11/2016 12:37:57 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
Originally posted by Neil:
Right...my wife would totally go for that...NOT. :) |
Second that!
Actually, I'm considering that there may well be other good options to the "quick access" issue. I hiked in Maui with friends, and one of them carried a small backpack, but kept his camera with the mounted lens at the ready using a Black Rapid strap. He seemed to like the way that worked. We did 800 vertical feet up, then back down (total of 4 miles of trail) in about 2.5 hours, so not a smokin' pace, but that's with time along the way for photos. That's what put me on the fast track to identifying a suitable pack ;-) |
I like the Black Rapid type straps, but they do swing around and are less good if you need to climb or bend. I used the Cotton Carrier when I hiked in the Canyons.
It may be your lucky day...at least to save money on what looks like a very nice pack with side access!
Deal of the day: Ruby 33 Tech for $49.95!!!! ($90 off). Looks worth a try!
Message edited by author 2016-02-11 00:38:11. |
|
|
|
02/11/2016 12:13:41 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by Neil:
Right...my wife would totally go for that...NOT. :) |
Second that!
Actually, I'm considering that there may well be other good options to the "quick access" issue. I hiked in Maui with friends, and one of them carried a small backpack, but kept his camera with the mounted lens at the ready using a Black Rapid strap. He seemed to like the way that worked. We did 800 vertical feet up, then back down (total of 4 miles of trail) in about 2.5 hours, so not a smokin' pace, but that's with time along the way for photos. That's what put me on the fast track to identifying a suitable pack ;-) |
|
|
|
02/10/2016 11:03:53 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by ciaeagle:
Originally posted by Neil:
I wanted to make sure that you realize that this (and apparently all the other) Tamracs (at least now) do not offer access while wearing the pack...which was one of your initial requirements. |
I don't have to take my Tamrac pack off to change the lens either. If I am wearing it my husband pulls out the lens or if he's wearing it I do. Muahaha! Otherwise rocks make great tables and I bring a black plastic bag to lay it on if the ground is required. |
Right...my wife would totally go for that...NOT. :) |
|
|
|
02/10/2016 10:17:02 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Neil:
I wanted to make sure that you realize that this (and apparently all the other) Tamracs (at least now) do not offer access while wearing the pack...which was one of your initial requirements. |
I don't have to take my Tamrac pack off to change the lens either. If I am wearing it my husband pulls out the lens or if he's wearing it I do. Muahaha! Otherwise rocks make great tables and I bring a black plastic bag to lay it on if the ground is required. |
|
|
|
02/10/2016 06:49:00 AM · #10 |
Here's a website that have user reviews and pictures showing what each bag can hold.
Camera Bag Review Site
Tim |
|
|
|
02/09/2016 06:29:32 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Neil:
...I wanted to make sure that you realize that this (and apparently all the other) Tamracs (at least now) do not offer access while wearing the pack...which was one of your initial requirements.
Personally, though the pack looks very good, I would never buy a pack where I had to take it off in order to change lenses. |
It's true the Tamrac series mentioned above are backpack-like. Yes, you do have to take the camera pack off your back to access equipment. 
In nearly ten years, I've not found this to be a problem because i want a secure system for rocky trails. If my terrain was flat and smooth, i'd be more receptive to a quick access system. And, I really like having a compartmentalized "platform" for staging image captures. I'm old and slow these days, but still strong enough to handle the weight of the equipment. |
|
|
|
02/09/2016 05:48:16 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
Originally posted by ciaeagle:
I have a Tamrac Expedition now and will likely be getting an Anvil when I finish this degree program. I'm looking at the 23 as well. Doesn't seem like the 27 would fit under the seat on the plane and allow leg room. It's only a couple of inches but I've found that can be a big deal. Especially on smaller planes or planes with narrow sections near the window (my favorite seat). |
That echoes my thoughts exactly. It seems that the Slim 15 is exactly the same pack as the 23, but shorter in height. I am carefully comparing that and the 23. Big difference is, my 24-70, my 100/2.8 Macro and perhaps a couple others would have to lay down, using up a lot more space. Really liking the 23, but I need to consider "flyability." |
'
I wanted to make sure that you realize that this (and apparently all the other) Tamracs (at least now) do not offer access while wearing the pack...which was one of your initial requirements.
Personally, though the pack looks very good, I would never buy a pack where I had to take it off in order to change lenses.
I was thinking another company good to look into which does is Kata. It turns out they've been bought my Manfrotto. But some of their nice bags are still around, just relabeled. See this one, for example for another nice bag but with side access:
//www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1049372&gclid=CjwKEAiAuea1BRCbn-2n7PbLgEMSJAABQvTT4ObtqOJlWPP73l9pb3IOQZhZyIRI_w_SqAj8ZWzb_RoCnfHw_wcB&is=REG&ap=y&m=Y&Q=&A=details
|
|
|
|
02/09/2016 03:07:04 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by ciaeagle:
I have a Tamrac Expedition now and will likely be getting an Anvil when I finish this degree program. I'm looking at the 23 as well. Doesn't seem like the 27 would fit under the seat on the plane and allow leg room. It's only a couple of inches but I've found that can be a big deal. Especially on smaller planes or planes with narrow sections near the window (my favorite seat). |
That echoes my thoughts exactly. It seems that the Slim 15 is exactly the same pack as the 23, but shorter in height. I am carefully comparing that and the 23. Big difference is, my 24-70, my 100/2.8 Macro and perhaps a couple others would have to lay down, using up a lot more space. Really liking the 23, but I need to consider "flyability."
|
|
|
|
02/09/2016 01:46:02 PM · #14 |
| I have a Tamrac Expedition now and will likely be getting an Anvil when I finish this degree program. I'm looking at the 23 as well. Doesn't seem like the 27 would fit under the seat on the plane and allow leg room. It's only a couple of inches but I've found that can be a big deal. Especially on smaller planes or planes with narrow sections near the window (my favorite seat). |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 08:56:36 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by hahn23:
No, I have the Tamrac Expedition model, which has served me well. I think the newer versions are similar. |
I believe you are correct, the newer "Anvil" line seems to be pretty much a direct replacement for the Expedition line. It does seem like they have made a lot of improvements. I really like what I see.
|
|
|
|
02/08/2016 07:54:32 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
Originally posted by Neil:
This one's a back saver! |
Haw! Funny, we just visited a goat dairy yesterday, LOL! They did have goats for sale, but my wife said she already had an old goat. O Snap!
Richard, that looks like an excellent pack. Are you using that model? If so, is it possible to access the camera/mounted lens without doffing the pack? The 27 actually looks like it might be a little more capacity than I need. The 23 looks like it will also take a 15" laptop, so perhaps that is also an option. |
No, I have the Tamrac Expedition model, which has served me well. I think the newer versions are similar. I hike with both hands free. Not really quick access to the camera, but I fall on my face a lot. |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 01:53:36 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
The 27 actually looks like it might be a little more capacity than I need. |
... and appears to cost more than my camera ... :-( |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 01:52:24 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by hahn23:
Originally posted by Neil:
This one's a back saver! |
Good one! LOL!!!
In the Rockies, the real deal goes to the llamas. I think it's their trail friendly hooves and their acclimation to 10,000'. |
Cool. And at least Llamas won't eat your lens rags and your other small pieces of equipment! |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 01:48:53 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Neil:
This one's a back saver! |
Haw! Funny, we just visited a goat dairy yesterday, LOL! They did have goats for sale, but my wife said she already had an old goat. O Snap!
Richard, that looks like an excellent pack. Are you using that model? If so, is it possible to access the camera/mounted lens without doffing the pack? The 27 actually looks like it might be a little more capacity than I need. The 23 looks like it will also take a 15" laptop, so perhaps that is also an option.
|
|
|
|
02/08/2016 12:13:43 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by Neil:
This one's a back saver! |
Good one! LOL!!!
In the Rockies, the real deal goes to the llamas. I think it's their trail friendly hooves and their acclimation to 10,000'. |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 11:12:34 AM · #21 |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 09:41:59 AM · #22 |
Tarmac Anvil 27
Will protect your back and your gear. Provides a working platform in the wilderness. A place for everything and everything in its place. |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 09:24:49 AM · #23 |
| I ended up going with a ThinkTank bag. Solid packs. |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 06:43:20 AM · #24 |
Amazon has the Fastpack 350 available for $90 and Adorama has the 350 AW for $130. I've had my 350 since they first came out and love it. My only complaint is that the grab handle on the top of the bag is a little small (and I don't have big hands).
Lowepro Fastback 350
Fastpack 350 AW - Adorama
Tim
Message edited by author 2016-02-08 06:45:10. |
|
|
|
02/08/2016 01:42:04 AM · #25 |
Neil, it looks like LowePro's latest models don't include the "350" size in the "Fastpack" line, only the 150 and 250. Looking at dimensions, though, it seems like the 250 AW II has about the same space as the 350 AW.
I'll do a bit more research, but at the price, the Fastpack 250 AW II seems like it might fit the bill. It definitely is not high end, but seems like it would be serviceable.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 08:18:55 AM EDT.
