DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

Threads will be shown in descending order for the remainder of this session. To permanently display posts in this order, adjust your preferences.
DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> If you love photographs
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 91, descending (reverse)
AuthorThread
08/14/2015 02:01:42 AM · #1
Not very contructive all this personnel crap.
08/14/2015 12:02:27 AM · #2
double post

Message edited by author 2015-08-14 07:00:03.
08/14/2015 12:02:27 AM · #3
Originally posted by Luciemac:

Originally posted by RayEthier:

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...


Could it be that you have a .... best I not mention the unmentionables. :O)

Ray


Pay attention, Ray. The unmentionables have already been mentioned. Seems everyone got the memo but you.


I am certain that Robert is quite capable of answering questions that are directed at him and needs no intervention from you. I happen to know Robert quite well and for all you know, the "unmentionables" I was alluding to dealt with culinary issues.

Thanks for once again making a quantum leap about exactly what others are thinking or suggesting.

You really must be in fantastic physical conditiion what with all this "Jumping to conclusions" regimen you consistently engage in.

Do carry on.
08/13/2015 11:05:16 PM · #4
Originally posted by Luciemac:

Originally posted by RayEthier:

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...


Could it be that you have a .... best I not mention the unmentionables. :O)

Ray


Pay attention, Ray. The unmentionables have already been mentioned. Seems everyone got the memo but you.


ROFL, in her FIRST response to me in fact. Really quite perfect. ;-)
08/13/2015 09:23:24 PM · #5
Originally posted by RayEthier:

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...


Could it be that you have a .... best I not mention the unmentionables. :O)

Ray


Pay attention, Ray. The unmentionables have already been mentioned. Seems everyone got the memo but you.
08/13/2015 06:19:45 PM · #6
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...


Could it be that you have a .... best I not mention the unmentionables. :O)

Ray
08/13/2015 04:08:28 PM · #7
Originally posted by Cory:

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...


Consider the source. I wouldn't suggest losing too much sleep over it.


Cory, stop smarting. Your virility's probably still intact....


"I'm guessing it was when you said that the OP's "deliberately provocative" phrase was no big deal ... I think a lot of people interpret "deliberately provocative" to be essentially the same as "baiting" -- something against the forum rules, especially in a non-Rant thread ..."


BAM.
08/13/2015 03:30:02 PM · #8
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...


Consider the source. I wouldn't suggest losing too much sleep over it.
08/13/2015 02:05:54 PM · #9
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

"What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh..."

I admitted I was wrong. Right?


Well, I guess so, but I was genuinely curious what I'd done that motivated such a reaction in the first place.

I'm guessing it was when you said that the OP's "deliberately provocative" phrase was no big deal ... I think a lot of people interpret "deliberately provocative" to be essentially the same as "baiting" -- something against the forum rules, especially in a non-Rant thread ...
08/13/2015 01:56:40 PM · #10
Nobody?
08/13/2015 01:52:16 PM · #11
Originally posted by Luciemac:

"What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh..."

I admitted I was wrong. Right?


Well, I guess so, but I was genuinely curious what I'd done that motivated such a reaction in the first place.

And NO, Brian, I don't "love the attention": I'm generally happiest when nobody's paying much attention to me :-)
08/13/2015 01:46:06 PM · #12
"What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh..."

I admitted I was wrong. Right?
08/13/2015 01:33:34 PM · #13
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...

Oh, stop pretending. You love the attention.
08/13/2015 12:57:13 PM · #14
Originally posted by Luciemac:

I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too),

What the heck have *I* done to warrant a "scathing indictment"? Sheesh...
08/13/2015 12:54:00 PM · #15
I was just composing a scathing indictment of Paul AND Robert (and a few others, too), none of whom I know well enough to interpret properly, but I tend to "vent" first and learn later, like many others on DPC.

I doubt that Paul had any intention of offending anyone with his OP, but was disappointed that he didn't simply say early on that he was sorry to have misspoken, rather than back-peddling to say it was "deliberately intended to be provocative".

But, hey...small quibble after reading his lovely and heartfelt response to Julie. My good mood is restored, so thank you, Paul.
08/13/2015 12:37:38 PM · #16
Thanks Paul, I appreciate that!

The tone of this thread I could not tell if it was being serious or a joke kinda of thing LOL

I am on the same page now :-))
08/13/2015 12:24:29 PM · #17
Originally posted by jgirl57:

AAA for the love of photography,

I am disappointed by this thread,

Then as I read on the thread. So what if that in other's eyes when in reality, I didn't get that image myself really, did I care for it, nor did I get its meaning will "It will not make me a photographer or that I am one" really?? What does that have to do with photography and for what a person takes, I just don't get it.

Oh, I don't make a living from photos and don't plan on it, but I have starting making some petty cash from it and it just recently, which by the way brought my new manfroto tripod and should have that within the next week or so. It also paid for my macro ring lights as well :-))

I LOVE photography, everyone has "their own tastes" from all over the world it is why I loved this site in the first place ..
this thread makes me feel I am in high school again.

I want to know why photographs tick with some others to why others don't give a crap about it and what was it that the person didn't care for it. There are a lot of images that were posted that I feel that way, tick with some and others there is no way it won't. I wanted to hear others thoughts and opinions and see explanations of why this or that.

(By the way, the one below by Jake, is one of my favs by far yet, but I was away at the time for voting. well done)

Overall, from this thread, I understood as: Oh yea, I am not a photographer. That is very discouraging for the newbies who may inspire to be one and have never heard of the dude. I respected the original OP statement and I was excited to see through others what this was all about.

Alas, I don't see it that way.

I am an enthusiast hobbyist who just loves photography and I have that burning desire to keep learning. Despite of what others say or do.


Dear Julie,
When someone tells you what photographs you should like, and what you should not like, you should consider them full of crap and ignore them. At the top of the list of such people to be ignored I put me, because in the case of this thread I actually was at the top of the pile of arrogant a-holes.
The "not a photographer" crack was ill-chosen because the author (me again, alas) did not think it would be taken to heart; taken literally. It was intended to be like saying, "If you don't love hotdogs you don't love the USA", which if taken literally would be ridiculous, but nonetheless does make a superficially valid rhetorical point.
If you see me post again, don't take the slightest notice. Same goes for several of the posters who most strenuously opposed my rhetoric, because they're just as full of crap as I am. Little bit fuller, actually, but let's keep that between us?
Cheers,
Paul

08/13/2015 09:12:39 AM · #18
thats what he's saying, that you love photography, you dont love photographs however photography is about photographs not photography.

i'm starting to think they are screwing with us.

08/13/2015 08:54:53 AM · #19
AAA for the love of photography,

I am disappointed by this thread,

Then as I read on the thread. So what if that in other's eyes when in reality, I didn't get that image myself really, did I care for it, nor did I get its meaning will "It will not make me a photographer or that I am one" really?? What does that have to do with photography and for what a person takes, I just don't get it.

Oh, I don't make a living from photos and don't plan on it, but I have starting making some petty cash from it and it just recently, which by the way brought my new manfroto tripod and should have that within the next week or so. It also paid for my macro ring lights as well :-))

I LOVE photography, everyone has "their own tastes" from all over the world it is why I loved this site in the first place ..
this thread makes me feel I am in high school again.

I want to know why photographs tick with some others to why others don't give a crap about it and what was it that the person didn't care for it. There are a lot of images that were posted that I feel that way, tick with some and others there is no way it won't. I wanted to hear others thoughts and opinions and see explanations of why this or that.

(By the way, the one below by Jake, is one of my favs by far yet, but I was away at the time for voting. well done)

Overall, from this thread, I understood as: Oh yea, I am not a photographer. That is very discouraging for the newbies who may inspire to be one and have never heard of the dude. I respected the original OP statement and I was excited to see through others what this was all about.

Alas, I don't see it that way.

I am an enthusiast hobbyist who just loves photography and I have that burning desire to keep learning. Despite of what others say or do.

Message edited by author 2015-08-13 09:09:49.
08/13/2015 06:47:45 AM · #20
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by posthumous:

And if I heard a remotely convincing explanation of why a DPC ribbon winner was good, I could easily change my mind about it.

This picture is "good" because it's technically effective in telling its story, and the story is compelling. How amazing it is, that thanks to Jake's perseverance we get to spy on such an intimate and fleeting moment in a bird-family's life, as the parent uses a berry to lure a fledgling out for its first flight. Is it "art"? Of course not. Is it a good photograph? Hell yes!



Thanks, Bear. I think. ;)
08/12/2015 09:17:47 PM · #21
Originally posted by jomari:

A picture's worth a thousand words.

That might make an interesting side challenge, though I fear the only way we'd get a thousand words about one picture would be for ten DPCers to write a hundred words each ... :-(
08/12/2015 08:38:10 PM · #22
Originally posted by Mike:

Originally posted by GeneralE:

Originally posted by posthumous:

And if I heard a remotely convincing explanation of why a DPC ribbon winner was good, I could easily change my mind about it.

What do you mean "good"?


lots of images are good, you just need a masters in writing in order to convey why to certain people. i'm beginning to think they like words more than pictures.


A picture's worth a thousand words.
08/12/2015 07:46:26 PM · #23
Originally posted by GeneralE:

Originally posted by posthumous:

And if I heard a remotely convincing explanation of why a DPC ribbon winner was good, I could easily change my mind about it.

What do you mean "good"?


lots of images are good, you just need a masters in writing in order to convey why to certain people. i'm beginning to think they like words more than pictures.

08/12/2015 06:44:09 PM · #24
Lartigue is awesome. The joy of photography seeped out of that guy's pores.

08/12/2015 06:27:12 PM · #25
Originally posted by posthumous:

And if I heard a remotely convincing explanation of why a DPC ribbon winner was good, I could easily change my mind about it.

This picture is "good" because it's technically effective in telling its story, and the story is compelling. How amazing it is, that thanks to Jake's perseverance we get to spy on such an intimate and fleeting moment in a bird-family's life, as the parent uses a berry to lure a fledgling out for its first flight. Is it "art"? Of course not. Is it a good photograph? Hell yes!

Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 06:33:28 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 06:33:28 PM EDT.