DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

Threads will be shown in descending order for the remainder of this session. To permanently display posts in this order, adjust your preferences.
DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> To Whom It May Concern:
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 38, descending (reverse)
AuthorThread
08/18/2014 10:56:37 PM · #1
Originally posted by Lydia:

I was not going to reply any more to this because it's gotten way too silly for words, but... after I was accused of something I had not done, nor even intended to do... I thought I should defend myself.

WE know that, YOU know that, but THEY didn't know that. Since the phrase was decidedly ambiguous and causing comment, we had to pay some attention to it. It's no big deal, we can all agree on that. And hopefully we can all agree it's time to close this thread down, because that's what I am about to do...
08/18/2014 08:51:26 PM · #2
This is just silly.

My reason for wanting to post a PM was not to cause harm, but... to show that I get PMs after leaving comments and people think I've voted when I haven't, and call me out on it in those PMs. There seems to be some disbelief about this and I simply wanted to show my innocence.

I never intended anything "hostile" nor did I intend to post any commentor's name.

There is nothing at all in a "hostile manner" about posting someone else's comment and not giving an opinion on it.

There's CERTAINLY no way that this could be construed as "attacking others".

Repeating what someone says... exactly as they say it, is not slander or attacking someone. It's quoting them; that's legal everywhere, I think.


"...the post was rightly reported because it contained a clear declaration of intent to violate a Forum Rule."


I disagree. I never declared anything of the sort. I just said that I would post a quotation. And... frankly, I'm surprised that anyone would assume this from me either from my words on this thread or from my prior behavior over the past seven years here.

I was not going to reply any more to this because it's gotten way too silly for words, but... after I was accused of something I had not done, nor even intended to do... I thought I should defend myself.



08/18/2014 08:34:35 PM · #3
Originally posted by Cory:

Posting a PM counts as "calling out"? I find that a little surprising, but I suppose it makes sense at some level.

Regardless, the rule exists and for good reason... "Be aware that others may have differing opinions of a personal attack, so use care when posting. Please note that this includes publicly "calling out" commenters (whether by name or not) in a hostile way." Posting negative PMs for the community to read and gossip over (which, sadly, is a major pastime in internet forums) certainly qualifies as "in a hostile way". If you don't like PMs you receive, the thing to do is bring them to SC's attention.
08/18/2014 07:17:29 PM · #4
Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Originally posted by RKT:

Originally posted by Cory:

Originally posted by GeneralE:

That's enough -- the post was rightly reported because it contained a clear declaration of intent to violate a Forum Rule. That part has subsequently been stricken. Case CLOSED.


I cannot quite see what forum rule she was threatening to break. Do enlighten me.


...maybe rule #11, the "calling out" bit?

Winner, winner, chicken dinner!


Posting a PM counts as "calling out"? I find that a little surprising, but I suppose it makes sense at some level. In any case, I still think a good portion of this community are just way too fricken sensitive. It's one of the bigger reasons why ya'll are almost never cursed with my horrible comments any longer, too many whiners that take offense after entering something to be judged, and I don't really feel like self-regulating that much, it's just too damned painful to reword every thought into something PC enough for the thin-skinned to consume without pain.
08/18/2014 06:54:04 PM · #5
Originally posted by RKT:

Originally posted by Cory:

Originally posted by GeneralE:

That's enough -- the post was rightly reported because it contained a clear declaration of intent to violate a Forum Rule. That part has subsequently been stricken. Case CLOSED.


I cannot quite see what forum rule she was threatening to break. Do enlighten me.


...maybe rule #11, the "calling out" bit?

Winner, winner, chicken dinner!
08/18/2014 06:22:51 PM · #6
I hate everyone's votes and comments, you all suck.
08/18/2014 06:11:03 PM · #7
Just want to say, I've always appreciated your comments, regardless of if you had voted or just commented.
08/18/2014 06:00:35 PM · #8
Originally posted by Cory:

Originally posted by GeneralE:

That's enough -- the post was rightly reported because it contained a clear declaration of intent to violate a Forum Rule. That part has subsequently been stricken. Case CLOSED.


I cannot quite see what forum rule she was threatening to break. Do enlighten me.


...maybe rule #11, the "calling out" bit?

On another note...I always love your comments Lydia. They are much appreciated.
08/18/2014 05:41:12 PM · #9
Originally posted by GeneralE:

That's enough -- the post was rightly reported because it contained a clear declaration of intent to violate a Forum Rule. That part has subsequently been stricken. Case CLOSED.


I cannot quite see what forum rule she was threatening to break. Do enlighten me.
08/18/2014 04:33:13 PM · #10
When I was competing, any negative PM I got about one of my comments during voting would automatically result in a drop of my vote on that image to a 1. That's what I'd suggest you do Lydia, even if you didn't even originally vote. It's up to you whether you then want to inform them of the change or not ;)
08/18/2014 04:31:20 PM · #11
Originally posted by Lydia:

How can some folks find SO MUCH to complain about?! Life is good, folks... try to see it that way... instead of finding things to complain about other people about. Well... unless you're perfectly flawless, then please... carry on. I can certainly learn from that.


Then you should follow all my postings and parse my words very carefully.

You will call me "Sensi" and I will call you "Little Grasshopper" and you will become as I am.

Let the teaching begin....
08/18/2014 04:28:42 PM · #12
We had the chance before she started causing trouble again. :P

08/18/2014 04:18:27 PM · #13
That's enough -- the post was rightly reported because it contained a clear declaration of intent to violate a Forum Rule. That part has subsequently been stricken. Case CLOSED.
08/18/2014 03:42:49 PM · #14
im sure they could cory, but haters gonna hate.

it's too bad you can't report a report...get the person who did so put into 48h forum access lockdown.
there's nothing offensive there in the post, and is just stating that using PMs to harass lydia for perceived slights will be publicized by her and not taken silently as they are unsolicited and can be erroneously attributed.

if people have a problem with that, the solution is "don't send her messages of that nature", not "lets get the rest of dpc riled up and into a mob-like state"
08/18/2014 03:37:25 PM · #15
Originally posted by vawendy:



Well, that was dull. People reported that?? Obviously DPC is getting too tame if this is the current bicker topic.

What ever happened to guns and religion? Or religious guns? *sigh*


I've been busy with work.

ETA: To whoever reported that - I cannot imagine why you would have done so, but surely you could find something more productive to do?

Message edited by author 2014-08-18 15:38:09.
08/18/2014 03:29:13 PM · #16
Keep the comments coming Lydia. I love them and I just got one from you today.
08/18/2014 02:43:44 PM · #17
Originally posted by vawendy:

... Or religious guns? *sigh*

You could take stock in that...
08/18/2014 02:30:11 PM · #18
Originally posted by RyanW:

Originally posted by vawendy:

Originally posted by Lydia:

Okay folks... You can all stop reporting my post to Site Council now. They've contacted me and I have edited my original post to suit you.

I hope you will now go out and find something fun to do that will make you enjoy life more!


Drat. I've missed the DPC fun. I always come too late to these threads and miss the interesting beginnings. We need an outtakes thread thread! :)

it's still there, just with strikethrough in the font


Well, that was dull. People reported that?? Obviously DPC is getting too tame if this is the current bicker topic.

What ever happened to guns and religion? Or religious guns? *sigh*
08/18/2014 02:26:20 PM · #19
Originally posted by vawendy:

Originally posted by Lydia:

Okay folks... You can all stop reporting my post to Site Council now. They've contacted me and I have edited my original post to suit you.

I hope you will now go out and find something fun to do that will make you enjoy life more!


Drat. I've missed the DPC fun. I always come too late to these threads and miss the interesting beginnings. We need an outtakes thread thread! :)

it's still there, just with strikethrough in the font
08/18/2014 02:25:40 PM · #20
Place a human face-to-face, they'll use it to communicate effectively.
Give a human anonymity, they'll use it to bemoan, whine and cause others grief.

08/18/2014 02:22:27 PM · #21
Originally posted by Lydia:

Okay folks... You can all stop reporting my post to Site Council now. They've contacted me and I have edited my original post to suit you.

I hope you will now go out and find something fun to do that will make you enjoy life more!


Drat. I've missed the DPC fun. I always come too late to these threads and miss the interesting beginnings. We need an outtakes thread thread! :)
08/18/2014 02:12:58 PM · #22
Oh my. I love your comments Lydia. (And I have just changed my preferences to 'anonymous' during voting. I frankly don't track how my vote correlates to comments, and I guess I did not realize how closely others did.)

08/18/2014 02:03:49 PM · #23
Originally posted by herfotoman:

We had a very articulate member of parliament in RSA in the 1930's, who said of parliament: "half of the people here are asses" and when forced to retract the statement said "half of the people here are not asses".

+1

FWIW both the reports and the correction were/are valid, and not an issue any more.
08/18/2014 01:54:06 PM · #24
Originally posted by Lydia:

Okay folks... You can all stop reporting my post to Site Council now. They've contacted me and I have edited my original post to suit you.

I hope you will now go out and find something fun to do that will make you enjoy life more!


They really reported you? Really? Sad. Very sad.

We had a very articulate member of parliament in RSA in the 1930's, who said of parliament: "half of the people here are asses" and when forced to retract the statement said "half of the people here are not asses". That is the exact type of retraction your comment needs.

08/18/2014 01:26:21 PM · #25
Okay folks... You can all stop reporting my post to Site Council now. They've contacted me and I have edited my original post to suit you.

I hope you will now go out and find something fun to do that will make you enjoy life more!

Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 04:00:09 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 04:00:09 PM EDT.