| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/28/2011 08:23:06 PM · #1 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by alohadave:
Originally posted by sjhuls:
because the lighting strikes in different frames in different spots. If there were no lightening it would be a different story. |
Then what is the point of allowing multiple frames if nothing can be changed between frames? |
As the rules state, you can combine identically-composed images to increase the dynamic range or the depth of field beyond what can be captured with a single exposure. The idea is be able to improve the technical quality without creating a new composition which didn't exist originally. |
Perhaps the rules should be amended to note that because that is not clear at all from reading them.
Edit: Nevermind, I see where it says it now.
Message edited by author 2011-08-28 20:25:00.
|
|
|
|
08/28/2011 07:57:25 PM · #2 |
(beaten to it)
Message edited by author 2011-08-28 19:58:02. |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 07:55:56 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by alohadave:
Originally posted by sjhuls:
because the lighting strikes in different frames in different spots. If there were no lightening it would be a different story. |
Then what is the point of allowing multiple frames if nothing can be changed between frames? |
As the rules state, you can combine identically-composed images to increase the dynamic range or the depth of field beyond what can be captured with a single exposure. The idea is be able to improve the technical quality without creating a new composition which didn't exist originally. |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 07:51:38 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by sjhuls:
because the lighting strikes in different frames in different spots. If there were no lightening it would be a different story. |
Then what is the point of allowing multiple frames if nothing can be changed between frames?
|
|
|
|
08/28/2011 07:14:23 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by sjhuls:
because the lighting strikes in different frames in different spots. If there were no lightening it would be a different story. |
exactly you can combine different exposures so long as nothing in the images changes, say for HDR. the was a challenge entry that was god example that got dq'd because one exposure had a swan or duck and the others didn't. |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 07:09:22 PM · #6 |
| because the lighting strikes in different frames in different spots. If there were no lightening it would be a different story. |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 06:58:35 PM · #7 |
Why would it be DQ? You can combine up to 10 frames and use layer masks in Advanced.
|
|
|
|
08/28/2011 06:44:34 PM · #8 |
Ok people, thanks very much.
I will choose a single exposure..man, and i was so proud of the result :)
|
|
|
|
08/28/2011 06:42:22 PM · #9 |
| Dq.....for that to work you would need to hold shutter open one time......however ...I'd like to see your photo though. |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 06:39:43 PM · #10 |
| it would be dq'd no question |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 05:47:34 PM · #11 |
| I would stay away from that one. |
|
|
|
08/28/2011 05:31:41 PM · #12 |
Hi,
I was wondering if a photo made up from 4 exposures, each photo having a lightning on a different part of the sky (the same skyline, camera didn't move), so the result would be a skyline full of lightnings would be acceptable as advanced editing..This would be my first submission with a stack photo, and I am not too sure if it wouldn't be DQ..
I am inclined to think so, but please confirm me..
Thanks.
Stefania |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 02:55:43 AM EDT.
