| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/19/2010 07:49:03 AM · #1 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
now we just need a rainbow challenge to completely transform this thread from a complaint to a challenge suggestion! |
hijackers r us |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 07:33:17 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by FourPointX:
Originally posted by Simms:
Originally posted by coryboehne:
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by FourPointX:
double sarcasm. almost as amazing as a double rainbow. |
 |
 |
YOu guys need to think bigger when shooting those there rainbows. |
ok i was waiting for someone to post this and no one has...have a good laugh this morning
double rainbow
ETA-if you make it all the way through you'll really appreciate the double rainbow remix that follows the original |
now we just need a rainbow challenge to completely transform this thread from a complaint to a challenge suggestion! |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 06:59:45 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by Simms:
Originally posted by coryboehne:
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by FourPointX:
double sarcasm. almost as amazing as a double rainbow. |
|
|
YOu guys need to think bigger when shooting those there rainbows. |
ok i was waiting for someone to post this and no one has...have a good laugh this morning
double rainbow
ETA-if you make it all the way through you'll really appreciate the double rainbow remix that follows the original
Message edited by author 2010-11-19 07:03:26. |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 06:22:46 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by coryboehne:
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by FourPointX:
double sarcasm. almost as amazing as a double rainbow. |
|
|
YOu guys need to think bigger when shooting those there rainbows. |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 03:31:56 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
I pay $100 extra to the SC just for a verification waiver for EACH challenge I enter. That may sound like corruption, but it's all part of a Political Science internship, so it's ok. |
You should definitely be a politician Ken. 'Manouvering' like this will be highly rewarded. |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 01:24:54 AM · #6 |
| I pay $100 extra to the SC just for a verification waiver for EACH challenge I enter. That may sound like corruption, but it's all part of a Political Science internship, so it's ok. |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 01:06:05 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by toutatis:
Is the site council not supposed to monitor votes and comments to avoid such stupid behaviours, clearly evidencing the use of fake accounts by poor photographers who need them to gain some places in the challenges they enter? |
While you're at it, I would like the SC to do something about every person who does not leave a comment on my photos, I pay $40 a year for extra storage so I should be doubly entitled. |
|
|
|
11/19/2010 12:53:32 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by dahlin:
Getting back to the original question, I had wondered what the user was doing because I had received several of his 4.5, 5.5 votes. And before I marked the comment as helpful, I wanted to know what the comment meant so I sent him a PM. This is the response I received:
"One of my graduate professors has us voting on photos based on rubrics we
create to try and predict what the average score will be for a photo."
Seemed harmless enough to me. |
When I got a 6.5 comment I just assumed he was making a prediction. Harmless for sure.
Message edited by author 2010-11-19 00:53:45. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 09:54:46 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by ace flyman:
Didn't everyone know we have "DNMC POLICE PATROL" here? He's one of the captains.....Lol. I don't see anything wrong and the average vote is over 5. I just commented on a member that's been here for over a year and hasn't entered a challenge. I don't think you need to enter challenges to enjoy and contribute to the site. |
Hrm. I believe I had a little altercation not so long ago where I was basically told that what I thought held no meaning whatsoever because I wasn't currently engaging in challenge entries. You might want to be careful what you say ;) LOL. |
Watch out, with a memory like that, people are going to start thinking you're female.... :)
Message edited by author 2010-11-18 21:55:18. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 09:46:56 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by ace flyman:
Didn't everyone know we have "DNMC POLICE PATROL" here? He's one of the captains.....Lol. I don't see anything wrong and the average vote is over 5. I just commented on a member that's been here for over a year and hasn't entered a challenge. I don't think you need to enter challenges to enjoy and contribute to the site. |
Hrm. I believe I had a little altercation not so long ago where I was basically told that what I thought held no meaning whatsoever because I wasn't currently engaging in challenge entries. You might want to be careful what you say ;) LOL. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 09:44:23 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by ace flyman:
I don't think you need to enter challenges to enjoy and contribute to the site. |
Got that right.
Ray |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 09:41:22 PM · #12 |
| Didn't everyone know we have "DNMC POLICE PATROL" here? He's one of the captains.....Lol. I don't see anything wrong and the average vote is over 5. I just commented on a member that's been here for over a year and hasn't entered a challenge. I don't think you need to enter challenges to enjoy and contribute to the site. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 09:24:47 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by FourPointX:
double sarcasm. almost as amazing as a double rainbow. |
|
|
|
|
|
11/18/2010 09:17:40 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by FourPointX:
double sarcasm. almost as amazing as a double rainbow. |
|
|
|
|
11/18/2010 08:44:09 PM · #15 |
Certainly good practices by dahlin.
BUT... One of my graduate professors told us...
So again, for the second time in a month, DPC is some testing ground for temporary members. And why is he the only guy dropping .5s?
To be honest I don't care. There are loads of weird voters here and there is no polite solution. But the gates do seem to be a bit low if you ask me. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 08:34:19 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by dahlin:
Getting back to the original question, I had wondered what the user was doing because I had received several of his 4.5, 5.5 votes. And before I marked the comment as helpful, I wanted to know what the comment meant so I sent him a PM. This is the response I received:
"One of my graduate professors has us voting on photos based on rubrics we
create to try and predict what the average score will be for a photo."
Seemed harmless enough to me. |
Getting back to basics here, are we  dahlin?
Sometimes all ya gotta do is ask.
I'm going to have to fave you dahlin, for that.
Just go to the source and ask.
Yes. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 08:23:22 PM · #17 |
| That is the second time I've seen that joke play out today online. Not kidding. Last one was about Palin running for president. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 08:19:47 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by BrennanOB:
Seems like you are just in time, we just need to determine who is the witch, or if we should burn them all and sort out guilt later. |
So, if he weighs more than a duck....
|
|
|
|
11/18/2010 08:06:03 PM · #19 |
| Bull. Do not believe that story for a second. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 07:28:14 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by dahlin:
Getting back to the original question, I had wondered what the user was doing because I had received several of his 4.5, 5.5 votes. And before I marked the comment as helpful, I wanted to know what the comment meant so I sent him a PM. This is the response I received:
"One of my graduate professors has us voting on photos based on rubrics we
create to try and predict what the average score will be for a photo."
Seemed harmless enough to me. |
There's the answer.. It's all over here folks.. Nothing to see, move along.. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 07:24:30 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by FourPointX:
double sarcasm. almost as amazing as a double rainbow. |
Win :-)
But FourPoint, we both know that nothing could ever come to close to being as amazing as a double rainbow across the sky. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 07:20:14 PM · #22 |
| What a strange thread. Where's those make commenting a requirement threads when you need them? |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 07:14:20 PM · #23 |
| SC actually gets paid, their memberships are free for their services. So $25 a year for their services. |
|
|
|
11/18/2010 07:07:41 PM · #24 |
Getting back to the original question, I had wondered what the user was doing because I had received several of his 4.5, 5.5 votes. And before I marked the comment as helpful, I wanted to know what the comment meant so I sent him a PM. This is the response I received:
"One of my graduate professors has us voting on photos based on rubrics we
create to try and predict what the average score will be for a photo."
Seemed harmless enough to me.
|
|
|
|
11/18/2010 07:03:57 PM · #25 |
Great, I knew this site was some sort of scam (or possibly a scamola)
I just pay my money into it to find out its some sort of Lamborghini slush fund?
4.5 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 05:21:21 PM EDT.
