| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/03/2009 11:30:54 PM · #151 |
| I'm hoping to move up with mine. I've had results from 6 challenges so far, and 4 out of the 6 have been 5.5x -- I guess I'm very consistent! But a little more variety would be nice (especially in the higher direction!) |
|
|
|
03/03/2009 11:32:40 PM · #152 |
| Don't wish for more variety. i did that once and the site kindly provided a 4.5........... |
|
|
|
03/03/2009 11:36:30 PM · #153 |
What about a squirrel covering my ass with a gun on his hands and shooting the the eyes of a hawk?
Would be a nice picture
Message edited by author 2009-03-03 23:37:06. |
|
|
|
03/03/2009 11:37:56 PM · #154 |
Originally posted by marcusvdt:
What about a squirrel covering my ass with a gun on his hands and shooting the the eyes of a hawk?
Would be a nice picture |
I think slippy has that one already... |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 12:15:46 AM · #155 |
Originally posted by Jason_Cross:
Nevermind. I broke a rule and had to unsubmit. I just can't enter any of these challenges. All my stuff has been worked on too much to qualify. Oh well. Here was my entry:
It just doesn't look right without the burning, so there is no way to enter it. |
.
Well I dodged a bullet there--that woulda kicked my entry to the curb! |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 12:20:16 AM · #156 |
Originally posted by chromeydome:
Originally posted by Jason_Cross:
Nevermind. I broke a rule and had to unsubmit. I just can't enter any of these challenges. All my stuff has been worked on too much to qualify. Oh well. Here was my entry:
It just doesn't look right without the burning, so there is no way to enter it. |
.
Well I dodged a bullet there--that woulda kicked my entry to the curb! |
Actually, to be perfectly honest, this photo has a lot more wrong with it than not looking right without a bit of burning.
The focus/shake blur issues with the hair, and that unfortunate Chromatic Aberration going on along the shirt line, are a couple of stand-outs. |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 12:42:19 AM · #157 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by chromeydome:
Originally posted by Jason_Cross:
Nevermind. I broke a rule and had to unsubmit. I just can't enter any of these challenges. All my stuff has been worked on too much to qualify. Oh well. Here was my entry:
It just doesn't look right without the burning, so there is no way to enter it. |
.
Well I dodged a bullet there--that woulda kicked my entry to the curb! |
Actually, to be perfectly honest, this photo has a lot more wrong with it than not looking right without a bit of burning.
The focus/shake blur issues with the hair, and that unfortunate Chromatic Aberration going on along the shirt line, are a couple of stand-outs. |
It still would have pulled a 5.5 just like I said. Those are neat image problems from resizing after using it. Those issues are not on the real photo. But thanks.
Message edited by author 2009-03-04 00:48:37. |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 01:14:11 AM · #158 |
Originally posted by Jason_Cross:
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
The focus/shake blur issues with the hair, and that unfortunate Chromatic Aberration going on along the shirt line, are a couple of stand-outs. |
It still would have pulled a 5.5 just like I said. Those are neat image problems from resizing after using it. Those issues are not on the real photo. But thanks. |
Well, obviously I couldn't know what caused the issues, I was just being honest. Whatever your original looks like is kind of beside the point, since this is the one you chose to show us :)
I hope I didn't offend, but if I did, it wasn't my intention.
Message edited by author 2009-03-04 01:14:27. |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 02:14:01 AM · #159 |
Well I obviously upset the Prudeites out there.
After 2 votes 3.5.
I think some went through & looked at the thumbnails & anything that looked like it showed too much skin got a low mark.
Just a quick thank you to you narrow minded, deprived, constipated fanatical idiots.
Oooh.... am I allowed to say that.. |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 02:41:03 AM · #160 |
Originally posted by aKiwi:
Well I obviously upset the Prudeites out there.
After 2 votes 3.5.
I think some went through & looked at the thumbnails & anything that looked like it showed too much skin got a low mark.
Just a quick thank you to you narrow minded, deprived, constipated fanatical idiots.
Oooh.... am I allowed to say that.. |
If you got a low vote for showing too much skin....why did you then give the same types of images a low score...?
|
|
|
|
03/04/2009 02:47:29 AM · #161 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by aKiwi:
Well I obviously upset the Prudeites out there.
After 2 votes 3.5.
I think some went through & looked at the thumbnails & anything that looked like it showed too much skin got a low mark.
Just a quick thank you to you narrow minded, deprived, constipated fanatical idiots.
Oooh.... am I allowed to say that.. |
If you got a low vote for showing too much skin....why did you then give the same types of images a low score...? |
re-read the statement ;D |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 02:49:19 AM · #162 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by aKiwi:
Well I obviously upset the Prudeites out there.
After 2 votes 3.5.
I think some went through & looked at the thumbnails & anything that looked like it showed too much skin got a low mark.
Just a quick thank you to you narrow minded, deprived, constipated fanatical idiots.
Oooh.... am I allowed to say that.. |
If you got a low vote for showing too much skin....why did you then give the same types of images a low score...? |
re-read the statement ;D |
DOH!!! I missed a word....I need to go back to bed.....sorry aKiwi!
|
|
|
|
03/04/2009 03:35:00 AM · #163 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by aKiwi:
Well I obviously upset the Prudeites out there.
After 2 votes 3.5.
I think some went through & looked at the thumbnails & anything that looked like it showed too much skin got a low mark.
Just a quick thank you to you narrow minded, deprived, constipated fanatical idiots.
Oooh.... am I allowed to say that.. |
If you got a low vote for showing too much skin....why did you then give the same types of images a low score...? |
re-read the statement ;D |
DOH!!! I missed a word....I need to go back to bed.....sorry aKiwi! |
Sleep well & explain it to me in the morning. |
|
|
|
03/04/2009 09:51:39 AM · #164 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by Jason_Cross:
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
The focus/shake blur issues with the hair, and that unfortunate Chromatic Aberration going on along the shirt line, are a couple of stand-outs. |
It still would have pulled a 5.5 just like I said. Those are neat image problems from resizing after using it. Those issues are not on the real photo. But thanks. |
Well, obviously I couldn't know what caused the issues, I was just being honest. Whatever your original looks like is kind of beside the point, since this is the one you chose to show us :)
I hope I didn't offend, but if I did, it wasn't my intention. |
No, I am just stressed. I have 3 programing classes running at the same time while I am trying to work, put out a yearbook and still spend time with my wife and kids. So I am snippy. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 11:35:30 AM EDT.
